Elsevier

CIRP Annals

Volume 63, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 751-771
CIRP Annals

High Energy Fluid Jet Machining (HEFJet-Mach): From scientific and technological advances to niche industrial applications

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2014.05.001Get rights and content

Abstract

With the increasing demands to generate complex parts on ever-more advanced, but difficult-to-cut materials, a group of technologies, generically called High Energy Fluid Jet Machining (HEFJet-Mach) has found niche applications that stimulated further development of science and technology in this field. Here HEFJet-Mach refers to unrestrained fluid jets used to remove and/or deform the workpiece material. The aim of this paper is to systematically present the recent developments of HEFJet-Mach from various perspectives: machine/system designs; modelling of both jet plumes and their interactions with the target surfaces; part quality including material integrity; supervision and control of the process; key aspects of machine maintenance and health and safety.

Introduction

With the development on harder (e.g. ceramics)/structurally heterogeneous (e.g. composites)/heat sensitive (e.g. shape memory alloys)/higher strength at elevated temperatures (e.g. aerospace alloys) materials there has been an increased demand on production scientists to identify/advance appropriate machining methods able to cope with such variety of engineering scenarios. Moreover, considering that these advanced materials are used on wide range of high-value/precision/miniature products (from medical to aerospace industries), the identification of a “perfect and universal” cutting process to encompass these demands is difficult, if not impossible; thus, groups of conventional/non-conventional machining methods, with defined application portfolios, have been established.

In this context, a niche set of abrasive technologies that use High Energy Fluid Jets (HEFJet) as “universal cutting tool” was developed and has evolved, over the years, as capable processing method. HEFJet uses free (i.e. unrestrained) jet plumes of water, air, oils to remove and/or deform the target material either by themselves or in association with abrasive particles entrained/pre-mixed within the jet. The pressurised fluids escaping through small diameter orifices result in kinetic energy of the plain/abrasive jets that are further utilised as processing tools, i.e. High Energy Fluid Jet Machining (HEFJet-Mach).

Considering the variety of methods and setups, HEFJet-Mach, can be categorised based on the following key characteristics:

  • Jet energy: this is usually related to the pressure pumps (p) utilised in the machine systems:

    • -

      low pressures p < 10 MPa, characterised by low jet energies, find their engineering use in surface polishing.

    • -

      high pressures (30 MPa < p < 700 MPa), characterised by high jet energies and used for through/controlled depth cutting.

  • Constitutive phases of the jet: plain fluid jets: 2 phase (liquid–air); abrasive fluid jets: 3 phase (liquid–solid–air).

  • Type of the fluids: the most common being: air only (blasting) [2], [3], [4]; water (with possible additives); oil.

  • Nature of solids injected into jets: hard-abrasives (garnet, SiC, Al2O3, and even diamond); soft-abrasives (ice, plastics).

  • Method of generating the abrasive jets:

    • -

      slurry jets where the abrasives are pre-mixed with the fluid before pressurising [44], [89], [90], [145].

    • -

      entrainment of solid particles within the jet by use of mixing chambers where the abrasives are drawn from external containers due to pressure difference [107], [172].

With these initial clarifications and starting from a critical evaluation of key advantages, challenges and niche application remit (Section 2) of the HEFJet-Mach technology, the paper introduces the technology enablers (Section 3), e.g. machine systems/setups, that allow the highlights of main advancements in related hardware and process approaches to be made; this establishes the base to review the latest advancements in modelling and simulation (Section 4) aspects on key constitutive elements (from stream formation to jet footprint) HEFJet system to further allow commenting on the quality aspects on processed parts (Section 5) and associated methods for monitoring and control (Section 6) of the process. Then, the paper discusses the applications (Section 7) on which HEFJet technology makes its mark, flags-up the particular issues on health and safety and standardisation (Section 8) that ends by commenting on the future directions of the technology and conclusions (Section 9).

Section snippets

HEFJet-Mach – advantages

HEFJet-Mach offers a set of key advantages over the other competitive machining methods [76].

  • Enables machining of difficult-to-cut materials (e.g. Ni/Ti alloys, ceramics). In contrast with the conventional (e.g. milling)/non-conventional (e.g. EDM) cutting techniques, HEFJet processing can cut any material regardless of their properties.

  • Involves very low specific cutting forces (<10 N/mm2) at acceptable material removal rates (10–50 mm3/s). With these unique attributes, HEFJet-Mach has the

Technology enablers for HEFJet-Mach

The commercial market for HEFJet-Mach systems seems to be dominated by entrainment abrasive waterjet (Fig. 1a); as such, in the following sections of the paper more attention will be given to the developments of these systems. Alternatively, the slurry jets (Fig. 1b) systems, that pass pre-mixed pressurised abrasive/water slurry through a nozzle to form a cutting jet, are employed; however, as abrasive slurries cannot be directly pumped, a pressure vessel containing a rubber bladder filled with

Advances in the analytical/numerical/empirical modelling aspects of HEFJet-Mach

The HEFJet-Mach process is a combination of various physical phenomena that have been studied in the literature either separately (single-physics models) or simultaneously (multi-physics models). As shown in Fig. 17, the physical aspects involved are:

  • 1 or 2 phase fluid dynamics for jet formation at the level of orifice.

  • 2 or 3 phase fluid dynamics in the mixing chamber.

  • 2 or 3 phase fluid dynamics at the jet plume.

  • Kinetic energy transfer at the jet footprint.

  • Curvature influence of the surface

Quality of parts processed by HEFJet-Mach and methods to overcome potential drawbacks

Despite the distinctive advantages of HEFJet-Mach over other competitively processing methods, there are some limitations and challenges related to quality of parts that are of great concern for manufacturers and end-users. As the material removal mechanism plays an important role in the contribution of the surface formed, the investigation about wear mechanisms and erosion modelling of particles have been traditionally derived, e.g. Finnie's ‘micro-cutting’ model [55] and Bitter's

Water flow rate and orifice monitoring

By interpreting both pump power and water pressure signals in an abrasive waterjet machining system, Annoni et al. [8] have reported on the estimation of water flow rate (via pumping frequency) and further on the performance (discharge efficiencies on power and water flow rate) and the condition (breakage, partial clogging) of the orifices of the waterjet heads by observing the shape of power signals as shown in Fig. 30.

Abrasive flow rate monitoring

In reference to the supervision of the abrasive mass flow to enable the

Applications of HEFJet-Mach

Due to its special properties HEFJet-Mach found its way into a wide range of state-of-the-art and niche applications in various industries as well as consequential machining purposes. HEFJet-Mach methods can be structured in different levels of jet penetration on the target surfaces.

Health and safety

High pressure HEFJet machining requires special safety measures not only on the construction of the system but especially in operation [154]. Working with pressures exceeding of thousands of bars, the HEFJet systems need to utilise high pressure certified piping/fittings/valves. As for the high-pressure HEFJet-Mach operation, any direct human contact with the direct/secondary (e.g. reflected) jets must be avoided as it can result in catastrophic injuries. Additionally, the noise level on these

Conclusions

Machining by use of high energy fluid jets represents a niche technology of unique capabilities difficult to match by other non-conventional processing methods. Not only any material can be machined at negligible cutting forces and virtually no heat affected zones but the recent developments in key hardware components of the HEFJet machines allow multi-axis motions of micro/macro/fan jets and thus putting this set of technologies at the forefront of high-value manufacturing industries.

Based on

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support and useful suggestions given by the CIRP STC G members to make this paper evolve from an incipient idea to final submission.

References (181)

  • A. Beaucamp et al.

    Super-Smooth Finishing of Diamond Turned Hard X-Ray Molding Dies by Combined Fluid Jet and Bonnet Polishing

    CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology

    (2013)
  • A. Beaucamp et al.

    Dynamic Multiphase Modeling and Optimization of Fluid Jet Polishing Process

    CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology

    (2012)
  • J. Billingham et al.

    Mathematical Modelling of Abrasive Waterjet Footprints for Arbitrarily Moving Jets: Part II – Overlapped Single and Multiple Straight Paths

    International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

    (2013)
  • F. Boud et al.

    Abrasive Waterjet Cutting of a Titanium Alloy: The Influence of Abrasive Morphology and Mechanical Properties on Workpiece Grit Embedment and Cut Quality

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (2010)
  • F.L. Chen et al.

    Minimising Particle Contamination at Abrasive Waterjet Machined Surfaces by a Nozzle Oscillation Technique

    International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

    (2002)
  • L. Cui et al.

    Application of Infrared Thermal Testing and Mathematical Models for Studying the Temperature Distributions of the High-Speed Waterjet

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (2009)
  • S. Dallaire

    Slurry Erosion Resistance of Boride-Based Overlays Containing Boride Crystals Oriented Perpendicularly to the Wearing Surface

    Wear

    (2013)
  • R. Deam

    Modelling of the Abrasive Water Jet Cutting Process

    Wear

    (2004)
  • M.S. Eltobgy et al.

    Finite Element Modeling of Erosive Wear

    International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

    (2005)
  • E.O. Ezugwu et al.

    Materials Titanium Alloys and Their Machinability – A Review

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (1997)
  • J.M. Fan et al.

    Modelling the Erosion Rate in Micro Abrasive Air Jet Machining of Glasses

    Wear

    (2009)
  • G. Fowler et al.

    The Effect of Particle Hardness and Shape When Abrasive Water Jet Milling Titanium Alloy Ti6Al4V

    Wear

    (2009)
  • G. Fowler et al.

    A Technical Note on Grit Embedment Following Abrasive Water-Jet Milling of a Titanium Alloy

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (2005)
  • G. Fowler et al.

    Abrasive Water-Jet Controlled Depth Milling of Ti6Al4V Alloy an Investigation of the Role of Jet Workpiece Traverse Speed and Abrasive Grit Size on the Characteristics of the Milled Material

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (2005)
  • H. Getu et al.

    Abrasive Jet Micromachining of Acrylic and Polycarbonate Polymers at Oblique Angles of Attack

    Wear

    (2008)
  • A. Ghobeity et al.

    Surface Evolution Models in Abrasive Jet Micromachining

    Wear

    (2008)
  • D. Griffin et al.

    The Development of a Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model for Solid Particle Erosion on an Alumina Scale/MA956 Substrate

    Wear

    (2004)
  • P. Gudimetla et al.

    Kerf Formation Analysis in the Abrasive Waterjet Cutting of Industrial Ceramics

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (2002)
  • A. Hascalik et al.

    Effect of Traverse Speed on Abrasive Waterjet Machining of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy

    Materials & Design

    (2007)
  • A.I. Hassan et al.

    Dynamic Elastic–Plastic Analysis of 3D Deformation in Abrasive Waterjet Machining

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (2001)
  • A.I. Hassan et al.

    On-line Monitoring of Depth of Cut in AWJ Cutting

    International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

    (2004)
  • L. Huang et al.

    Mechanisms of Damage Initiation in a Titanium Alloy Subjected to Water Droplet Impact During Ultra-High Pressure Plain Waterjet Erosion

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (2012)
  • Y. Iwai et al.

    Evaluation of Erosive Wear Resistance of TiN Coatings by a Slurry Jet Impact Test

    Wear

    (2006)
  • Y. Iwai et al.

    Micro-Slurry-Jet Erosion (MSE) Testing of CVD TiC/TiN and TiC Coatings

    Wear

    (2009)
  • M. Junkar et al.

    Finite Element Analysis of Single-Particle Impact in Abrasive Water Jet Machining

    International Journal of Impact Engineering

    (2006)
  • B. Karpuschewski et al.

    Cryogenic Wet-Ice Blasting – Process Conditions and Possibilities

    CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology

    (2013)
  • M.C. Kong et al.

    Mathematical Modelling of Abrasive Waterjet Footprints for Arbitrarily Moving Jets: Part I – Single Straight Paths

    International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

    (2012)
  • M.C. Kong et al.

    An Innovative Method to Perform Maskless Plain Waterjet Milling for Pocket Generation: A Case Study in Ti-Based Superalloys

    International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

    (2011)
  • M.C. Kong et al.

    Aspects of Material Removal Mechanism in Plain Waterjet Milling on Gamma Titanium Aluminide

    Journal of Materials Processing Technology

    (2010)
  • Abrasive Feeding System

    (2013)
  • M. Achtsnick

    High Performance Micro Abrasive Blasting

    (2005)
  • M. Annoni et al.

    Waterjet Decoating

  • M. Annoni et al.

    Water Jet Peening of a Low-Alloy Steel by Means of a Standard Water Jet Cutting Machine Under Different Process Conditions

    Structural Durability & Health Monitoring

    (2010)
  • M. Annoni et al.

    Measurements, Analysis, and Interpretation of the Signals From a High-Pressure Waterjet Pump

    IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

    (2008)
  • M. Annoni et al.

    Measurement of Water Jet Velocity Distribution Using Laser Velocimetry

    IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

    (2008)
  • M. Annoni et al.

    The Continuous Control of the Abrasive Mass Flow Rate and Feed Rate as a New Opportunity in the AWJ Precision Machining

  • A.I. Ansari et al.

    Effect of Abrasive Waterjet Parameters on Volume Removal Trends in Turning

    ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry

    (1995)
  • S. Anwar et al.

    Finite Element Modelling of a Single-Particle Impact During Abrasive Waterjet Milling

    Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology

    (2011)
  • D. Arola et al.

    Waterjet and Abrasive Waterjet Surface Treatment of Titanium?: A Comparison of Surface Texture and Residual Stress

    Control

    (2002)
  • M. Arola et al.

    A Study of Kerf Characteristics in Abrasive Water Jet Machining of Graphite/Epoxy Composite

    Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology

    (1996)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text