Historical Perspective
Functional catalytic membrane development: A review of catalyst coating techniques

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2020.102207Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Catalyst coating techniques for catalytic membrane preparation were reviewed.

  • Catalyst coating techniques were categorized into physical and chemical routes.

  • Principles, advantages and drawbacks of the various techniques were emphasized.

  • Perspectives on future development of catalyst coating techniques were highlighted.

Abstract

Catalytic membranes combine catalytic activity with conventional filtration membranes, thus enabling diverse attractive benefits into the conventional membrane filtration processes, such as easy catalyst reuse, antifouling, anti-microbial, and enhancing process efficiency. Up to date, tremendous progresses have been made on functional catalytic membrane preparation and applications, which significantly advances the competitiveness of membrane technologies in process industries. The present article provides a critical and holistic overview of the current state of knowledge on existing catalyst coating techniques for functional catalytic membrane development. Based on coating mechanisms, the techniques are generally categorized into physical and chemical surface coating routes. For each technique, we first introduce fundamental principle, followed by a critical discussion of their applications with representative case studies. Advantages and drawbacks are also emphasized for different surface coating technologies. Finally, future perspectives are highlighted to provide deep insights into their future developments.

Introduction

Membrane technologies offer attractive advantages in mass separation processes or chemical conversion processes owing to facile operation, small footprint, scalable capacities, and high separation efficiency [1]. Based on the membranes' functions, membrane structures, and their operation fashions, a number of different membrane processes have been developed, including micro/ultra/nano-filtration, reverse/forward osmosis, membrane reactor, membrane extractor (e.g., gas separation and pervaporation), and membrane contactor (e.g., membrane distillation and membrane condenser). However, the conventional membranes often suffer from some inherent drawbacks, such as membrane fouling, inadequate separation of low molecular sized substances and limited pollutant degradation [2], which limit their practical applications.

Integration of catalysis and chemical reactivity into membrane filtration leads to innovative and smart membrane separation systems. These chemically reactive membranes radically transform physical filtration into chemically or catalytically reactive processes that progressively eliminates the inherent limitations of traditional membrane filtration processes such as membrane fouling, pollutant rejection or degradation. Typical catalysis that have been integrated into membrane filtration include photocatalysis, catalytic ozonation, electrochemical oxidation, Fenton or Fenton-like processes. For example, the most widely studied photocatalytic membranes are enabled by membrane surface coating with photocatalysts [3]. Mélisa Hatat-Fraile et al. prepared three types of TiO2 composite membranes (including undoped, boron-doped, and nitrogen-doped TiO2) via sol-gel dip coating, and assessed their photocatalytic degradation of acid orange 7 (dye) through a dead-end filtration process [4]. Semiconductor catalysts (e.g., SnO2, ZrO2 and WO3) and carbonaceous materials (e.g., g-C3N4) have been utilized to modify the inorganic or polymeric membranes, and even metallic substrate such as stainless steel. Qi Zhang et al. prepared a g-C3N4/ TiO2 nanotube array membrane by imbedding g-C3N4 quantum dots into TiO2 supporting layer. More than 60% of rhodamine B was removed by the g-C3N4/TiO2 membrane on account of the synergistic effect of photocatalysis and membrane filtration. Additionally, both the performance of bacterial cell removal and anti-fouling capability were enhanced by the immobilized membrane. Similarly, catalytic ozonation can also be achieved on membranes coated with titania and other catalysis such as Al2O3, MnO2, FeOOH, bimetallic oxides and carbonaceous materials (e.g., graphene or carbon nanotubes). Catalytic membrane filtration may also be achieved by exposing membranes to mixed oxidants generated from homogeneous catalysis such as UV/O3, O3/UV/H2O2, H2O2/UV, Fe2+/H2O2, FeS/H2O2, UV/persulfate, and UV/chlorine [5]. This type of reactive membrane systems is not within the scope and relevant discussions of this review, which primarily focuses on surface catalyst coating.

Besides catalytic properties, surface coating can also enhance other material functionalities such as durability [6], anti-abrasion [7], antifouling [8] and antimicrobial properties [9]. For instance, silver nanoparticles are reported to coat on polysulfone membranes to achieve antimicrobial properties on membrane surface [10]. Carbonaceous nanomaterials such as graphene and carbon nanotubes were coated on cellulose triacetate membranes to enhance surface electrical conductivity and electrochemical reactions for pollutant degradation [11]. The properties of catalytic membranes such as rejection, selectivity, pollutant degradation and antifouling ability could be adjusted by catalysts coatings. Successful catalyst coating not only enables reactive membrane filtration but also helps retain catalyst and prevent aggregation.

Catalytic membranes are also important for realization of process intensification to further reduce equipment/energy cost and enhance process efficiency. For example, product separation in catalytic membrane reactors can overcome thermodynamic equilibrium limitations of enormous synthesis reactions (e.g., esterification, acetalization, hydrogenation/dehydrogenation, and water-gas shift reaction) to achieve superior conversions. Alternatively, in situ catalytic degradation on the membrane surface can significantly mitigate membrane fouling and thus remarkably improve the rejection or degradation of pollutants in membrane processes.

Two main strategies have been used to prepare catalytic membranes by either incorporating the catalysts into the membrane matrix or coating on the membrane surface [12]. The former strategy is simple and straightforward, but apparently the as-prepared membranes suffer from limited overall catalytic activity due to reduced accessibility of the embedded catalysts [13]. Furthermore, integrating catalysts into the membrane matrix may compromise the properties and functionality of the pristine membrane such as physical structures, porosity, mechanical strength or elasticity and chemical selectivity [14]. Therefore, surface coating for catalysts is often a desirable means to prepare catalytic membranes, which not only enables direct catalyst exposure to the reactants, but potentially improve the mass transfer and reaction rates via a forced convection [12]. Up to now, a variety of surface coating techniques have been developed for innovative and smart catalytic membranes. However, comprehensive reviews of these surface coating techniques are still lacking, and more importantly, catalyst coating on membrane filtration materials still seem premature for industrialization due to the sophisticated procedures and some negative impacts on membrane permeability or catalyst activity.

The present paper aims to provide a critical and holistic discussion of the current state of knowledge on existing surface coating techniques for catalyst immobilization on membranes. These techniques are classified into two major sections: physical surface coating and chemical surface coating techniques. The principles of each technique are first introduced, followed by a critical discussion of their successful applications with representative case studies. Advantages and shortcomings of the surface coating technologies are also highlighted. Finally, we analyze the major challenges and give personal perspectives on these techniques to provide insights into their future developments.

Section snippets

Physical coating techniques

Physical coating refers to a process during which a coating layer is created on the substrate surface via physical processes such as adsorption, complexation, or hydrogen bonding [15]. Typical physical coating techniques include physical vapor deposition, dip-coating, spin-coating, casting, filtration, and lay-by-layer assembly. This section analytically discussed these physical coating techniques for catalyst immobilization on different membrane substrates.

Chemical coating techniques

Although the catalyst coating by physical coating techniques as previously described offers functionalized properties and good quality, it is often not cost effective due to the requirements of sophisticated and expensive equipment and a large amount of coating substances. Since the need to produce high-quality coatings with low cost is essential for practical applications, chemical coating techniques usually receive higher popularity. In contrast to physical coating, chemical coating

Summary and outlook

A fundamental understanding of physical and chemical coating mechanisms at material interfaces will provide a foundation for development and application of advanced multifunctional materials. A plethora of catalyst coating techniques have been developed for membrane fabrication and functionalization to enable surface reactivity and other desirable physicochemical properties. The present review provides a comprehensive overview of these techniques including their principles,

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was partially funded by Beijing Outstanding Young Scientist Program (BJJWZYJH01201910004016), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award Number: 51778306), the U.S. Department of the Interior via Bureau of Reclamation (Agreement number: R19AC00106) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Agreement No. 83945101-0) to New Jersey Institute of Technology. It has not been formally reviewed by these funding agencies. The views expressed in this document are solely those of

References (173)

  • S. Yun et al.

    Correlations in palladium membranes for hydrogen separation: a review

    J Membr Sci

    (2011)
  • J.E. Brom et al.

    Hybrid physical–chemical vapor deposition of bi 2 se 3 films

    J Cryst Growth

    (2016)
  • S. Varnagiris, et al.

    Incorporation of SiO2 and TiO2 additives into expanded polystyrene foam using physical vapour deposition technique

    Energy Procedia

    (2017)
  • G. Xomeritakis et al.

    Fabrication of thin metallic membranes by MOCVD and sputtering

    J Membr Sci

    (1997)
  • P. Quicker et al.

    Catalytic dehydrogenation of hydrocarbons in palladium composite membrane reactors

    Catal Today

    (2000)
  • A. Arfaoui et al.

    Structural, morphological, gas sensing and photocatalytic characterization of MoO3 and WO3 thin films prepared by the thermal vacuum evaporation technique

    Appl Surf Sci

    (2015)
  • S. Wang et al.

    Ti/(ti,Cr)N/CrN multilayer coated 316L stainless steel by arc ion plating as bipolar plates for proton exchange membrane fuel cells

    J Energy Chem

    (2017)
  • L. Xiong et al.

    Fabrication and characterization of Pd/Nb40Ti30Ni30/Pd/porous nickel support composite membrane for hydrogen separation and purification

    Int J Hydrogen Energ

    (2010)
  • H. Klette et al.

    Sputtering of very thin palladium-alloy hydrogen separation membranes

    Membrane Technol

    (2005)
  • M. Rahimpour et al.

    Palladium membranes applications in reaction systems for hydrogen separation and purification: a review

    Chem Eng Proces: Process Intensific

    (2017)
  • C. Zhang et al.

    Self-assembly synthesis of ordered mesoporous carbon thin film by a dip-coating technique

    Microporous Mesopor Mater

    (2013)
  • X. Pan et al.

    Deposition of sol–gel derived membranes on α-Al2O3 hollow fibers by a vacuum-assisted dip-coating process

    J Membr Sci

    (2003)
  • H. Choi et al.

    Sol–gel preparation of mesoporous photocatalytic TiO2 films and TiO2/Al2O3 composite membranes for environmental applications

    Appl Catal Environ

    (2006)
  • T.A. Peters et al.

    Preparation of zeolite-coated pervaporation membranes for the integration of reaction and separation

    Catal Today

    (2005)
  • W. Zhang et al.

    Enhancement of esterification conversion using novel composite catalytically active pervaporation membranes

    J Membr Sci

    (2014)
  • X.-H. Ma et al.

    Preparation and characterization of PFSA–PVA–SiO2/PVA/PAN difunctional hollow fiber composite membranes

    J Membr Sci

    (2010)
  • H. Sun et al.

    PVA/SO42−-AAO difunctional catalytic-pervaporation membranes: preparation and characterization

    Sep Purif Technol

    (2020)
  • Z. Miswan et al.

    Drug-eluting coating of ginsenoside Rg1 and re incorporated poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) on stainless steel 316L: physicochemical and drug release analyses

    Int J Pharm

    (2016)
  • S.-L. Chen et al.

    The effect of photonic band gap on the photo-catalytic activity of nc-TiO2/SnO2 photonic crystal composite membranes

    Chem Eng J

    (2014)
  • Y. Zhao et al.

    Synergistic oxidation - filtration process analysis of catalytic CuFe2O4 - tailored ceramic membrane filtration via peroxymonosulfate activation for humic acid treatment

    Water Res

    (2020)
  • W. Qing et al.

    Solvent-thermal induced roughening: a novel and versatile method to prepare superhydrophobic membranes

    J Membr Sci

    (2018)
  • H.H. Wang et al.

    A novel green solvent alternative for polymeric membrane preparation via nonsolvent-induced phase separation (NIPS)

    J Membr Sci

    (2019)
  • W. Zhang et al.

    Lipase immobilized catalytically active membrane for synthesis of lauryl stearate in a pervaporation membrane reactor

    Bioresour Technol

    (2014)
  • Z. Cao et al.

    Enhancing bioethanol productivity by a yeast-immobilized catalytically active membrane in a fermentation-pervaporation coupling process

    J Membr Sci

    (2020)
  • R. Molinari et al.

    Studies on various reactor configurations for coupling photocatalysis and membrane processes in water purification

    J Membr Sci

    (2002)
  • J. Long et al.

    Effective production of resistant starch using pullulanase immobilized onto magnetic chitosan/Fe3O4 nanoparticles

    Food Chem

    (2018)
  • X.-J. Bai et al.

    Two-dimensional MOF-derived nanoporous cu/Cu2O networks as catalytic membrane reactor for the continuous reduction of p-nitrophenol

    J Membr Sci

    (2019)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Catalytic PVDF membrane for continuous reduction and separation of p-nitrophenol and methylene blue in emulsified oil solution

    Chem Eng J

    (2018)
  • R.K. Iler

    Multilayers of colloidal particles

    J Colloid Interface Sci

    (1966)
  • Y. Gao et al.

    Membrane surface modification with TiO2–graphene oxide for enhanced photocatalytic performance

    J Membr Sci

    (2014)
  • J. Luo et al.

    Fabrication of hierarchical layer-by-layer membrane as the photocatalytic degradation of foulants and effective mitigation of membrane fouling for wastewater treatment

    Sci Total Environ

    (2020)
  • M. Liu et al.

    Tube-in-tube hollow fiber catalytic membrane microreactor for the hydrogenation of nitrobenzene

    Chem Eng J

    (2018)
  • S. Mu et al.

    Au nanoparticles self-assembled onto Nafion membranes for use as methanol-blocking barriers

    Electrochem Commun

    (2005)
  • H. Tang et al.

    Self-assembling multi-layer Pd nanoparticles onto NafionTM membrane to reduce methanol crossover

    Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp

    (2005)
  • H. Tang et al.

    Self-assembled Nafion–silica nanoparticles for elevated-high temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells

    Electrochem Commun

    (2007)
  • K. Li et al.

    Self-assembled Nafion®/metal oxide nanoparticles hybrid proton exchange membranes

    J Membr Sci

    (2010)
  • X. Qiu et al.

    Flame retardant coatings prepared using layer by layer assembly: a review

    Chem Eng J

    (2018)
  • X. Zhang et al.

    Progress on the layer-by-layer assembly of multilayered polymer composites: strategy, structural control and applications

    Prog Polym Sci

    (2019)
  • L. Pawlowski

    Finely grained nanometric and submicrometric coatings by thermal spraying: a review

    Surf Coat Technol

    (2008)
  • Y.F. Lin et al.

    Rapid atmospheric plasma spray coating preparation and photocatalytic activity of macroporous titania nanocrystalline membranes

    J Membr Sci

    (2012)
  • Cited by (75)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Weihua Qing and Fang Liu contributed equally to this work.

    View full text