Spatiotemporal variations of residual stresses during multi-track and multi-layer deposition for laser powder bed fusion of Ti-6Al-4V

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110462Get rights and content

Abstract

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is an additive manufacturing technology to fabricate parts with complex geometries. Residual stresses induced by the rapid heating and cooling processes may cause defects such as cracks, distortion and delamination. This work presents an in-depth study for the understanding of the evolution of residual stresses during LPBF of Ti-6Al-4V. A 3D finite element model was developed to study the spatiotemporal variations of the temperature and the stresses during multi-track and multi-layer LPBF. The results show that the scanning strategies significantly affected the temperature gradients and the resultant stress distributions. The induced residual stresses were higher along the laser scanning direction than that along the perpendicular direction. Monitored at the longitudinal central plane, stresses changed from compressive to tensile along the vertical build direction from the substrate to the top of the build. The Z-component of stress was smaller than the X- and Y-components stresses. The peak tensile Z-component of stress was at the interface between the part and the substrate, which may lead to local warping and cracking. The findings from this work provide insights for the understanding of stress related issues such as the massive longitudinal and transverse solidification cracking during LPBF.

Introduction

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is a fast-growing additive manufacturing technique, during which process, layer-wise deposition is realized through the repetitive heating, melting, solidification, and cooling processes of the feedstock material [1], [2]. Despite its numerous advantages, LPBF has many issues such as residual stresses, cracking, and geometric inaccuracies [3], [4], [5], [6]. These issues are interdependent and are affected by the cyclic thermal cycles generated by the rapidly moving laser beam during LPBF. A deep understanding of the formation mechanisms and the mitigation strategies of these printing issues is important to the production of a sound LPBF component.

A comprehensive understanding of the spatiotemporal variations of the temperature and the stresses during LPBF is a prerequisite for the solution of the above printing issues. The development of residual stresses during LPBF depends on several factors including the thermo-mechanical properties of the feedstock material, the input energy densities, and the scanning strategies of the heat source [6], [7]. Experimental approaches can be used to characterize the stresses including non-destructive methods such as X-ray diffraction (XRD) and neutron diffraction (ND), and destructive methods such as contour and hole drilling methods. For instance, Chen et al. [8] proposed a residual stresses measurement via XRD technique with pre-treatment using mechanical polishing and chemical etching. Uhlmann et al. [9] presented a system for the realization of in situ synchrotron XRD during LPBF of multi-layer deposition. Observations of arbitrary positions in the sample enabled the measurement of the dynamic evolution of strains and stress during LPBF. Staub et al. [10] measured residual stresses via XRD during LPBF of SS316L. Wang et al. [11] presented a method using ND to validate thermo-mechanical models developed to predict the residual stresses in Inconel 625 walls fabricated by laser directed energy deposition. ND and thermomechanical modelling were stated as complementary techniques for the determination of residual stresses. Wu et al. [12] measured residual stresses using digital image correlation in conjunction with build plate removal and sectioning. The obtained results were compared to the non-destructive volumetric ND technique. It was found that residual stresses were reduced by increasing the island to wall rotation to 45 degrees, increasing energy input, and decreasing the island size [12].

Destructive monitoring approaches such as contour and hole drilling techniques were reported for the measurement of residual stresses [13], [14], [15], [16]. The contour method involves cutting a sample into two parts with subsequent measurement of the resultant deformations [13]. The hole drilling method involves applying strain gauges near the surface of a deposited sample, and the computation of original stresses from the deformations occurred upon the drilling of the hole [14]. Cao et al. [15] measured residual stresses using the hole drilling method in the electron beam PBF of Ti-6Al-4V builds. For the hole drilling method in the sixth layer, only the in-plane stresses at or near the free surface could be obtained. In contrast, ND was able to measure the elastic strain along a transverse line 4 mm below the top surface in the cross-section of the substrate [15]. Barros et al. [16] used hole drilling strain gauge method to measure the residual stresses and direction depth profiles during LPBF of Inconel 718. It was found that in the as-built condition, the residual stresses were approximately half of the yield strength on the top surface and near yield strength on the vertically oriented lateral surface [16]. Note that both non-destructive and destructive methods for stress measurement focus on limited monitoring locations and are time consuming. It is thus enormously challenging to obtain the spatiotemporal variations of the stresses in the entire build via experimental approaches, which necessitate help from numerical simulations.

The finite element analysis (FEA) plays an important role in the study of thermal–mechanical behavior during LPBF. Several studies have been reported on the optimization of process variables for the mitigation of residual stresses [17], [18], [19], [20]. For instance, Mukherjee et al. [17] used an improved numerical approach considering both heat transfer and fluid flow to explore the evolution of residual stresses and distortion during laser DED. It was found that smaller layer thickness resulted in lower residual stresses. Xiao et al. [18] investigated the influences of laser power, scanning speed, and hatch spacing on the evolution of temperature and residual stresses based on the software of Abaqus. Cheng et al. [19] investigated the effects of eight scanning strategies on residual stresses and deformation. It was found that the out-in scanning pattern had the maximum stresses and large directional stresses were generated by using the horizontal line scanning strategy. Zou et al. [20] investigated the effect of scanning strategy on residual stresses using single and multiple lasers. It was observed that the residual stresses were significantly higher as the laser beams increased from one to four with a resultant higher heat input. FEA models have also been used to explore mitigation approaches for the residual stresses using pre-process or post-process treatments. For example, Sharma et al. [21], investigated the development and mitigation of residual stresses in LBPF of Ti-6Al-4V. It was concluded that the maximum value of residual stresses was reduced by 41% with a substrate preheating of 673 K comparing with that without preheating. Ali et al. [22] investigated the effect of re-scanning during LBPF of Ti-6Al-4V, and observed that re-scanning with 150% energy density resulted in 33.6% reduction in residual stresses.

Although many researches have been reported on the study of residual stresses during LPBF, a deeper understanding of the evolution of residual stresses during LPBF is still needed. For instance, the temporal and spatial variations of the temperature and stress fields during the LPBF process need systematic explorations. Thus, the dynamic variations of the stresses during the deposition processes can be revealed, which can provide guidance for the correlated researches such as solidification cracking. To this end, in this study, a 3D finite element model was developed to study the spatiotemporal variations of the temperature and the stresses during multi-track and multi-layer LPBF. Various scanning strategies were used for different layers. The dependences of the residual stresses on the layer-wise variable temperature distributions would be explored. The variations of X-, Y-, and Z-components of stress along different monitoring paths during multi-layer LPBF were systematically examined. The findings of this work provide a better understanding of the temporal development and the spatial distributions of residual stresses during LPBF of Ti-6Al-4V.

Section snippets

Methodologies

A 3D thermomechanical model was developed based on the software Abaqus to compute the temperature field and the thermal stresses in both single-track and multi-track LPBF of Ti-6Al-4V. The geometric mesh of the model is shown in Fig. 1. A substrate with dimensions of 2000 µm × 1400 µm × 600 µm and the deposition region with dimensions of 1200 µm × 600 µm × 180 µm were used. Non-uniform meshes were used for the balance of computational efficiency and accuracy and the mesh size was 30 µm in the

Spatiotemporal variations of the temperature and stress fields

The temperature fields were computed first in order to simulate the evolution of the stresses during multi-layer and multi-track laser PBF. Fig. 2 shows the temperature fields during deposition from the first layer up to the sixth layer using layer-wise different scanning directions. The distribution of the temperature contours demonstrates strong dependences on the scanning strategy of the laser beam. For instance, the temperature contours were significantly stretched along the longitudinal

Conclusion

In this work, a coupled thermo-mechanical model was developed to explore the spatiotemporal variations of the temperature and residual stresses during LPBF of Ti-6Al-4V. The influences of various scanning strategies on the distribution features of residual stresses during the multi-track and multi-layer deposition processes were comprehensively examined. The subsequent conclusions can be drawn:

  • (1).

    The temperature field played a paramount role in the evolution and the distribution of residual

CRediT authorship contribution statement

T. Machirori: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. F.Q. Liu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Visualization, Writing - review & editing. Q.Y. Yin: Methodology, Formal analysis. H.L. Wei: Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51805267) and The Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20180483).

References (42)

  • T. Mukherjee et al.

    An improved prediction of residual stresses and distortion in additive manufacturing

    Comput. Mater. Sci.

    (2017)
  • Z. Xiao et al.

    Design study of residual stress in selective laser melting of Ti6Al4V

    Materials

    (2020)
  • B. Cheng et al.

    Stress and deformation evaluations of scanning strategy effect in selective laser melting

    Addit. Manuf.

    (2016)
  • S. Zou et al.

    Numerical analysis of the effect of the scan strategy on the residual stress in the multi-laser selective laser melting

    Results Phys.

    (2020)
  • H. Ali et al.

    Effect of scanning strategies on residual stress and mechanical properties of Selective Laser Melted Ti6Al4V

    Mater. Sci. Eng.: A

    (2018)
  • A. Hussein et al.

    Finite element simulation of the temperature and stress fields in single layers built without-support in selective laser melting

    Mater. Des.

    (2013)
  • I.A. Roberts et al.

    A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the temperature field during laser melting of metal powders in additive layer manufacturing

    Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.

    (2009)
  • D. Gu et al.

    Finite element simulation and experimental investigation of residual stresses in selective laser melted Ti–Ni shape memory alloy

    Comput. Mater. Sci.

    (2016)
  • A. Foroozmehr et al.

    Finite element simulation of selective laser melting process considering optical penetration depth of laser in powder bed

    Mater. Des.

    (2016)
  • P. Fischer et al.

    Sintering of commercially pure titanium powder with a Nd: YAG laser source

    Acta Mater.

    (2003)
  • M. Biegler et al.

    In-situ distortions in LMD additive manufacturing walls can be measured with digital image correlation and predicted using numerical simulations

    Addit. Manuf.

    (2018)
  • Cited by (27)

    • Multi-layer thermo-fluid modeling of powder bed fusion (PBF) process

      2022, Journal of Manufacturing Processes
      Citation Excerpt :

      Gan et al. [38] presented a multi-physics model of six-layer PBF to calculate melt pool dimensions and microstructure of Ni-based alloy parts. Using a 3D finite element model, Machirori et al. [39] examined the influences of various scanning strategies on the distribution of residual stresses during the multi-layer L-PBF of Ti6Al4V. Wu et al. [40] developed a numerical model to understand the consolidation mechanism in a multi-layer process of electron beam PBF.

    • Mesoscopic simulation of surface morphology and thermodynamic mechanism during laser powder-bed fusing Ni-based composite: Underlying role of WC weight fraction

      2022, Materials Today Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      LPBF, as a newly developed type of Laser additive manufacturing technologies, enables the quick fabrication of three-dimensional parts with geometry-complex shapes directly from loose metallic powders using a high-energy source by a layer-upon-layer strategy on the basis of full melting /solidification mechanism [3]. This unique feature allows the production of customized parts directly from the digital data nearly without acquiring expensive post-treatments [4]. However, in spite of the widely recognized merits of LPBF in producing the complex components, a major limit of this technology is related to the unacceptable surface quality that could significantly restrict the industrial applications [5].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text