Elsevier

Composites Part B: Engineering

Volume 110, 1 February 2017, Pages 442-458
Composites Part B: Engineering

3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034Get rights and content

Abstract

The use of 3D printing for rapid tooling and manufacturing has promised to produce components with complex geometries according to computer designs. Due to the intrinsically limited mechanical properties and functionalities of printed pure polymer parts, there is a critical need to develop printable polymer composites with high performance. 3D printing offers many advantages in the fabrication of composites, including high precision, cost effective and customized geometry. This article gives an overview on 3D printing techniques of polymer composite materials and the properties and performance of 3D printed composite parts as well as their potential applications in the fields of biomedical, electronics and aerospace engineering. Common 3D printing techniques such as fused deposition modeling, selective laser sintering, inkjet 3D printing, stereolithography, and 3D plotting are introduced. The formation methodology and the performance of particle-, fiber- and nanomaterial-reinforced polymer composites are emphasized. Finally, important limitations are identified to motivate the future research of 3D printing.

Introduction

3D printing, also referred to as additive manufacturing(AM), rapid prototyping(RP), or solid-freeform(SFF), is a ‘process of joining materials to make objects from 3D model data, usually layer by layer’ [1], which was first described in 1986 by Charles Hull [2]. This technology creates objects by adding materials to reduce waste while reaching satisfactory geometric accuracy [3]. It begins with a meshed 3D computer model that can be created by acquired image data or structures built in computer-aided design (CAD) software. A STL (Surface Tessellation Language) file is commonly created. The mesh data will be further sliced into a build file of 2D layers and sent to the 3D printing machine.

Thermoplastic polymer materials such as acrylonitrile butadiene styrene(ABS) [4], [5], [6], polylactic acid(PLA) [4], [6], [7], polyamide(PA) [8] and polycarbonate(PC) [9] as well as thermosetting polymer materials like epoxy resins could be processed by 3D printing technology. Epoxy resins are reactive materials that require thermal or UV-assisted curing to complete the polymerization process, and they initially exhibit a low viscosity, which rises as the curing proceeds [10], [11], [12]. Therefore, epoxy resins are suitable for heat or UVsingle bond assisted printing process. Based on the various selections of materials, 3D printing of polymers has found their possible applications in aerospace industries for creating complex lightweight structures [13], architectural industries for structural models [14], art fields for artifact replication or education [15], and medical fields for printing tissues and organs [16]. However, most of 3D printed polymer products are still now used as conceptual prototypes rather than functional components, since pure polymer products built by 3D printing are lack of strength and functionality as fully functional and load-bearing parts. Such drawbacks restrict the wide industrial application of 3D printed polymers.

3D printing of polymer composites solves these problems by combining the matrix and reinforcements to achieve a system with more useful structural or functional properties non attainable by any of the constituent alone [17]. Incorporation of particle, fiber or nanomaterial reinforcements into polymers permits the fabrication of polymer matrix composites, which are characterized by high mechanical performance and excellent functionality. Conventional fabrication techniques of composites such as molding, casting and machining create products with complex geometry through material removal processes [18]. While the manufacturing process and performance of composites in these methods are well-controlled and understood, the ability to control the complex internal structure is limited. 3D printing is able to fabricate complex composite structures without the typical waste. The size and geometry of composites can be precisely controlled with the help of computer aided design. Thus, 3D printing of composites attains an excellent combination of process flexibility and high performance products.

Although 3D printing has attracted a lot of attentions over the past three decades, most of published review articles focused on introductions of processing techniques and printing of pure polymer materials. However, in the recent several years, there has been considerable achievements in developing printable polymer composites with improved performance. Hence, we present, analyze and summarize information pertinent to 3D printing of polymer composites in this review. We first provide a brief introduction of 3D printing technique used for polymer composites and their characteristics. Next, we investigate the detailed printing technique implementations and properties improvements of polymer composites. Biomedical, electronics and aerospace applications of polymer composites are explored then. In particular, work done in last five years are emphasized to show the progress in this area. Finally, we discuss the limitations of current technologies and future perspective.

Section snippets

3D printing technology description

3D printing is a methodology that produces 3D haptic physical models layer by layer based on CAD models [19]. Various printing techniques have been employed to fabricate polymer composites. Among them, some techniques are well-established, such as fused deposition modeling, selective laser sintering, inkjet 3D printing, stereolithography and 3D plotting whereas others are still in development or used only by small groups of researchers. Each technique has its own advantages and limitations in

3D printing of polymer matrix composites

Polymer materials with low melting point or in liquid state are widely used in 3D printing industry due to their low weight, low cost and processing flexibility. Although 3D printed polymer products could have geometric complexity, lack of mechanical strength and functionality is a big challenge for their wide applications. Combining various materials for achieving desired mechanical and functional properties is a promising way to solve these problems. Therefore, in recent years, development of

Biomedical application

With the development of Computed Tomography(CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI) technology, three-dimensional images of tissues and organs have become more informative with higher resolution [92]. Using the acquired image data, patient specific tissues and organs with intricate 3D microarchitecture could be produced by 3D printing technology. Polymer materials currently used for printing in the field of biomedical applications are based on naturally derived polymers(gelatin, alginate,

Future research

Although 3D printing of polymer composites has undergone significant developments in recent years, it is still not widely accepted by most industries. Several limitations of this technology need to be overcome.

  • Material: The wide application of 3D printing is severely limited by printable materials. Currently, only thermoplastic polymer with low glass transition temperature and suitable melting viscosity, powder formed materials and a few photopolymers could be used in 3D printing. However,

References (129)

  • T. Billiet et al.

    A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering

    Biomaterials

    (2012)
  • G. Postiglione et al.

    Conductive 3D microstructures by direct 3D printing of polymer/carbon nanotube nanocomposites via liquid deposition modeling

    Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf

    (2015)
  • H. Chung et al.

    Processing and properties of glass bead particulate-filled functionally graded Nylon-11 composites produced by selective laser sintering

    Mater Sci Eng A

    (2006)
  • M. Nikzad et al.

    Thermo-mechanical properties of a highly filled polymeric composites for fused deposition modeling

    Mater Des

    (2011)
  • D. Isakov et al.

    3D printed anisotropic dielectric composite with meta-material features

    Mater Des

    (2016)
  • J.J. Martin et al.

    Designing bioinspired composite reinforcement architectures via 3D magnetic printing

    Nat Commun

    (2015)
  • W. Zhong et al.

    Short fiber reinforced composites for fused deposition modeling

    Mater Sci Eng A

    (2001)
  • H.L. Tekinalp et al.

    Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive manufacturing

    Compos Sci Technol

    (2014)
  • F. Ning et al.

    Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling

    Compos Part B Eng

    (2015)
  • G. Griffini et al.

    3D-printable CFR polymer composites with dual-cure sequential IPNs

    Polymer

    (2016)
  • J. Wang et al.

    A novel approach to improve mechanical properties of parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling

    Mater Des

    (2016)
  • A. Le Duigou et al.

    3D printing of wood fibre biocomposites: From mechanical to actuation functionality

    Mater Des

    (2016)
  • X. Tian et al.

    Interface and performance of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites

    Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf

    (2016)
  • H. Lu et al.

    Self-assembled multi-layered carbon nanofiber nanopaper for significantly improving electrical actuation of shape memory polymer nanocomposite

    Compos Part B Eng

    (2014)
  • H. Lu et al.

    Functionally graded and self-assembled carbon nanofiber and boron nitride in nanopaper for electrical actuation of shape memory nanocomposites

    Compos Part B Eng

    (2014)
  • H. Lu et al.

    Significantly improving infrared light-induced shape recovery behavior of shape memory polymeric nanocomposite via a synergistic effect of carbon nanotube and boron nitride

    Compos Part B Eng

    (2014)
  • X. Yan et al.

    Lowly loaded carbon nanotubes induced high electrical conductivity and giant magnetoresistance in ethylene/1-octene copolymers

    Polymer

    (2016)
  • H. Lu et al.

    Synergistic Effect of Siloxane Modified Aluminum Nanopowders and Carbon Fiber on Electrothermal Efficiency of Polymeric Shape Memory Nanocomposite

    Compos Part B Eng

    (2015)
  • H. Zhan et al.

    Transfer printing for preparing nanostructured PDMS film as flexible SERS active substrate

    Compos Part B Eng

    (2016)
  • S.R. Athreya et al.

    Processing and characterization of a carbon black-filled electrically conductive Nylon-12 nanocomposite produced by selective laser sintering

    Mater Sci Eng A

    (2010)
  • Z. Weng et al.

    Mechanical and thermal properties of ABS/montmorillonite nanocomposites for fused deposition modeling 3D printing

    Mater Des

    (2016)
  • H. Zheng et al.

    Effect of core–shell composite particles on the sintering behavior and properties of nano-Al 2 O 3/polystyrene composite prepared by SLS

    Mater Lett

    (2006)
  • H. Chung et al.

    Functionally graded Nylon-11/silica nanocomposites produced by selective laser sintering

    Mater Sci Eng A

    (2008)
  • S. Kumar et al.

    Composites by rapid prototyping technology

    Mater Des

    (2010)
  • T. Serra et al.

    High-resolution PLA-based composite scaffolds via 3-D printing technology

    Acta biomater

    (2013)
  • A. Standard

    F2792, Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies

    (2012)
  • Hull, C.W., Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. 1986, Google...
  • Q. Sun et al.

    Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments

    Rapid Prototyp J

    (2008)
  • R. Melnikova et al.

    3D printing of textile-based structures by Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) with different polymer materials

  • C.R. Garcia et al.

    3D printing of anisotropic metamaterials

    Prog Electromagn Res Lett

    (2012)
  • H. Gu et al.

    An overview of multifunctional epoxy nanocomposites

    J Mat Chem C

    (2016)
  • E. Kroll et al.

    Enhancing aerospace engineering students' learning with 3D printing wind-tunnel models

    Rapid Prototyp J

    (2011)
  • K.V. Wong et al.

    A review of additive manufacturing

    ISRN Mech Eng

    (2012)
  • D.B. Short

    Use of 3D printing by museums: educational exhibits, artifact education, and artifact restoration

    3D Print Addit Manuf

    (2015)
  • S.V. Murphy et al.

    3D bioprinting of tissues and organs

    Nat Biotechnol

    (2014)
  • S.K. Malhotra et al.

    Part One Introduction to Polymer Composites

  • S.H. Huang et al.

    Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review

    Int J Adv Manuf Technol

    (2013)
  • F. Rengier et al.

    3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications

    Int J Comput Assisted Radiology Surg

    (2010)
  • Sachs, E.M., J.S. Haggerty, M.J. Cima, and P.A. Williams, Three-dimensional printing techniques. 1993, Google...
  • Y. Cho et al.

    Laser scanning path generation considering photopolymer solidification in micro-stereolithography

    Microsyst Technol

    (2005)
  • Cited by (2428)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text