Review
Investigations on the properties of geopolymer mortar and concrete with mineral admixtures: A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.025Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A comprehensive review of geopolymer mortar and concrete with mineral admixtures.

  • A total of 126 research papers spanning a period of 22 years are reviewed.

  • Mineral admixtures effects on fresh, mechanical and durability properties.

  • Use of OPC, GGBFS, Nano-silica, Metakaolin, and Alccofine in Geopolymer products.

  • Microstructure analysis of geopolymer mortars and concrete is reviewed.

  • Research gap has been identified and elaborated.

Abstract

The climatic changes associated with global warming due to greenhouse gases emission from cement production attracted researchers towards geopolymer based cementitious materials. Nowadays researchers are in a continuous process to improve the mechanical properties of geopolymer mortar and concrete at ambient temperature curing condition so as to broaden its scope of utilization in building construction. The review paper summarizes the effect of various mineral additives on mechanical, durability and microstructure characteristics of geopolymer mortar and concrete. Research findings revealed that geopolymer products blended with these materials showed a significant improvement in mechanical and durability properties at normal temperature conditions. The results advocate that geopolymer mixtures with desired properties can be designed for ambient temperature curing condition with minerals additives which may further promote them as an environmentally friendly construction material.

Introduction

Globally, concrete is still a leading construction material owing to its wide-ranging mechanical properties, better long-term performance, easy application, and cost-effectiveness. The concrete production which is estimated to be approximately one cubic meter per capita requires the manufacturing of cement on a massive scale [1]. The global cement demand is estimated at over 4.216 billion metric tons in 2018 as per International Cement Review Research Report which further requires nearly 9.476 × 107 Joules/ton of energy consumption in its production process [1]. It is estimated that carbon dioxide released during cement manufacturing process contributes approximately 5 to 7% of the total carbon dioxide released in the environment which is considered as a prominent reason to accelerate global warming.

Growing industrialization is also responsible for the release of waste by-products such as fly ash, rice husk ash, ground granulated blast furnace slags, which are pozzolanic in nature. Environmentally compatible dumping of these waste materials requires suitable techniques. The world earth summits also warned cement industry to switch over from Portland cement to a greener alternative binder with desirable structural as well as durability properties so that the increased emission of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere can be controlled.

Researchers globally explored the ancient construction materials and found that geopolymer materials were used in Egyptians pyramids during 2630 BCE–2611 BCE [2]. In this quest, Joseph Davidovits, a French material scientist proposed a term ‘geopolymer’ to represent a broad range of materials characterized by chains or networks of inorganic molecules and also pointed out the possibility of its use as a binder material in concrete. The special features of the geopolymer, such as the development of high early strength and better resistance to chemical attacks fascinated the scientific community. Geopolymer materials require raw materials which are rich in silicon (Si) and aluminum (Al) and alkaline activator solutions. The binding properties of these materials are obtained by the process of polymerization which primarily differentiates them from the conventional cement based binder materials. Geopolymeric materials don’t require cement as a binder which emits greenhouse gases, so it makes it an environmentally friendly material.

Geopolymers may address the issue of disposal of industrial waste materials by utilizing industrial by-products such as rice husk ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS), fly ash, silica fume, and red mud as a source material. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or potassium hydroxide (KOH) and sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) solution can be used to activate the source materials. Another important aspect of geopolymers is that water plays no significant role in the chemical reaction but helps in producing a workable mixture which reduces the water requirement [3]. Geopolymeric gel obtained from the polymerization process possess cementitious properties and act as a binder in geopolymer concrete [4], [5].

The curing process adopted for geopolymer concrete (GPC) differentiates it from conventional cement concrete. Instead of water curing, heat curing i.e. steam curing and air curing is generally used in geopolymer concrete. The heat curing process is generally used to activate the polymerization reaction. Geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature could not achieve desirable compressive strength [6], [7], [8]. Therefore most of the research on geopolymer concrete was conducted by using electric hot air oven technique for elevated temperature curing [9], [10]. The fly ash based geopolymer concrete when exposed to heat curing system could achieve desired mechanical properties [11], [12], [13], [14] but lacked in case of normal room temperature curing conditions [8], [15]. A significant share of research used heat cured conditions for curing of geopolymer concrete and the curing temperature was generally between 60 °C and 100 °C [10], [16], [17], [18], [19]

The heat curing mechanism requires special arrangement which may not be cost-effective and limit the GPC uses in precast construction practices. Therefore to broaden the scope of geopolymer based concrete in general construction use, researchers focussed their attention towards developing GPC at ambient temperatures which may be cost-effective as well as easy to practice.

Several Researchers observed that the mechanical strength and durability properties of geopolymer concrete can be significantly enhanced with the blending of ordinary Portland cement [20], ground granulated blast furnace slag [21], [22], nano-silica [23], [24], [25], [26] and Alccofine [6], [27] at ambient temperature curing.

This paper presents a comprehensive review of the enhancement of properties of geopolymer mortar and concrete with the inclusion of the various type of mineral admixtures at ambient curing conditions.

Section snippets

Significance of the study

Geopolymer materials are finding its way towards replacing conventional construction materials as green materials, but still, the research is limited to heat curing conditions. The scope of acceptability of geopolymer products such as geopolymer mortar, paste and concrete can be expanded if they can suitably and economically be developed at ambient temperature curing conditions. This study investigated the recent development in geopolymer products with the inclusion of various mineral

Constituent materials

The different type of aluminosilicate source materials, alkaline activators, and mineral admixtures are discussed hereafter.

Methods of curing

The methods of curing generally adopted in practice are discussed here.

Geopolymer mortar and concrete with different curing regimes

The development of microstructure and mechanical properties of the geopolymer matrix is significantly affected by the extent of geopolymerisation reaction which is temperature dependent. Generally, the geopolymerisation reaction is enhanced at a higher temperature than ambient [18]. Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete attains poor compressive strength [6], [11] and higher drying shrinkage [8], [11] at ambient cured regime than heat curing. Therefore, researchers adopted elevated curing at

Geopolymer mortar and concrete with mineral admixtures at ambient temperature curing

Following paragraphs discuss the effects on the properties of geopolymer concrete with the inclusion of OPC, GGBFS, Metakaolin, Nano-silica and Alccfine as a mineral admixture.

Conclusions

The current paper summarizes the comprehensive review on the scope of enhancement of mechanical strength and durability properties of geopolymer products at ambient temperature. Mineral additives use in geopolymer materials may be adopted as a suitable way of enhancing their properties at normal room temperature conditions. It has been observed that additives with high calcium content may be used but still more research is required to decide the optimum quantity. Using nanomaterials in future

Research gaps and suggestions for future research

The current study is focussed primarily on the effects of mineral admixtures on the properties of fly ash based geopolymer mortar and concrete. Authors put forward a few suggestions for the aspiring future researchers as follows.

  • 1.

    The investigations on the effects of mineral admixtures on various type of aluminosilicate source materials can be performed.

  • 2.

    Mineral admixtures can be used in combinations as a hybrid admixture to enhance the properties of geopolymer paste, mortar and concrete.

  • 3.

    The

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (126)

  • D. Adak et al.

    Effect of nano-silica on strength and durability of fly ash based geopolymer mortar

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2014)
  • P.S. Deb et al.

    Effects of nano-silica on the strength development of geopolymer cured at room temperature

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2015)
  • M.-H. Zhang et al.

    Use of nano-silica to reduce setting time and increase early strength of concretes with high volumes of fly ash or slag

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2012)
  • J. He et al.

    Synthesis and characterization of red mud and rice husk ash-based geopolymer composites

    Cem. Concr. Compos.

    (2013)
  • A. Palomo et al.

    Chemical stability of cementitious materials based on metakaolin

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (1999)
  • A. Mehta et al.

    Properties of low-calcium fly ash based geopolymer concrete incorporating OPC as partial replacement of fly ash

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2017)
  • H.A. Nguyen et al.

    Sulfate resistance of low energy SFC no-cement mortar

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2016)
  • T. Bakharev et al.

    Resistance of alkali-activated slag concrete to alkali–aggregate reaction

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2001)
  • A. Islam et al.

    The development of compressive strength of ground granulated blast furnace slag-palm oil fuel ash-fly ash based geopolymer mortar

    Mater. Design (1980-2015)

    (2014)
  • G. Kakali et al.

    Thermal treatment of kaolin: the effect of mineralogy on the pozzolanic activity

    Appl. Clay Sci.

    (2001)
  • A. Fernández-Jiménez et al.

    Alkaline activation of metakaolin–fly ash mixtures: obtain of zeoceramics and zeocements

    Microporous Mesoporous Mater.

    (2008)
  • S.C. Kou et al.

    Comparisons of natural and recycled aggregate concretes prepared with the addition of different mineral admixtures

    Cem. Concr. Compos.

    (2011)
  • M.-H. Zhang et al.

    Use of nano-silica to increase early strength and reduce setting time of concretes with high volumes of slag

    Cem. Concr. Compos.

    (2012)
  • K. Behfarnia et al.

    The effects of nano-silica and nano-alumina on frost resistance of normal concrete

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2013)
  • M. Dri et al.

    Mineral carbonation from metal wastes: effect of solid to liquid ratio on the efficiency and characterization of carbonated products

    Appl. Energy

    (2014)
  • H. Wan et al.

    Analysis of geometric characteristics of GGBS particles and their influences on cement properties

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2004)
  • A. Graytee et al.

    Development of a high strength fly ash-based geopolymer in short time by using microwave curing

    Ceram. Int.

    (2018)
  • J.J. Ekaputri et al.

    Wijaya, Effect of Curing Temperature and Fiber on Metakaolin-based Geopolymer

    Procedia Eng.

    (2017)
  • J. Van Jaarsveld et al.

    The effect of composition and temperature on the properties of fly ash-and kaolinite-based geopolymers

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2002)
  • F.U.A. Shaikh et al.

    Comparative strain and deflection hardening behaviour of polyethylene fibre reinforced ambient air and heat cured geopolymer composites

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2018)
  • M. Albitar et al.

    Durability evaluation of geopolymer and conventional concretes

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2017)
  • H. Alanazi et al.

    Bond strength of PCC pavement repairs using metakaolin-based geopolymer mortar

    Cem. Concr. Compos.

    (2016)
  • H.Y. Zhang et al.

    Effect of temperature on bond characteristics of geopolymer concrete

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2018)
  • J.L. Provis et al.

    The role of particle technology in developing sustainable construction materials

    Adv. Powder Technol.

    (2010)
  • P. Nuaklong et al.

    Properties of metakaolin-high calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete containing recycled aggregate from crushed concrete specimens

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2018)
  • C.K. Yip et al.

    The coexistence of geopolymeric gel and calcium silicate hydrate at the early stage of alkaline activation

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2005)
  • A. Mehta et al.

    Strength, permeability and micro-structural characteristics of low-calcium fly ash based geopolymers

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2017)
  • S. Alonso et al.

    Calorimetric study of alkaline activation of calcium hydroxide–metakaolin solid mixtures

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2001)
  • J. Temuujin et al.

    Influence of calcium compounds on the mechanical properties of fly ash geopolymer pastes

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2009)
  • P. Chindaprasirt et al.

    Strength, porosity and corrosion resistance of ternary blend Portland cement, rice husk ash and fly ash mortar

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2008)
  • M. Talha Junaid et al.

    A mix design procedure for low calcium alkali activated fly ash-based concretes

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2015)
  • G. Fang et al.

    Workability and mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash-slag concrete cured at ambient temperature

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2018)
  • P.S. Deb et al.

    The effects of ground granulated blast-furnace slag blending with fly ash and activator content on the workability and strength properties of geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature

    Mater. Design(1980-2015)

    (2014)
  • P. Nath et al.

    Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2014)
  • S. Hu et al.

    Bonding and abrasion resistance of geopolymeric repair material made with steel slag

    Cem. Concr. Compos.

    (2008)
  • S.M. Laskar et al.

    Preparation and tests for workability, compressive and bond strength of ultra-fine slag based geopolymer as concrete repairing agent

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2017)
  • M. Chi et al.

    Binding mechanism and properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag mortars

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2013)
  • P.K. Mehta, Development, High-performance, high-volume fly ash concrete: materials, mixture proportioning, properties,...
  • J. Davidovits

    High-alkali cements for 21st century concretes

    Special Publication

    (1994)
  • V. Sreevidya, Investigations on the flexural behaviour of ferro geopolymer composite slabs,...
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text