ReviewInvestigations on the properties of geopolymer mortar and concrete with mineral admixtures: A review
Introduction
Globally, concrete is still a leading construction material owing to its wide-ranging mechanical properties, better long-term performance, easy application, and cost-effectiveness. The concrete production which is estimated to be approximately one cubic meter per capita requires the manufacturing of cement on a massive scale [1]. The global cement demand is estimated at over 4.216 billion metric tons in 2018 as per International Cement Review Research Report which further requires nearly 9.476 × 107 Joules/ton of energy consumption in its production process [1]. It is estimated that carbon dioxide released during cement manufacturing process contributes approximately 5 to 7% of the total carbon dioxide released in the environment which is considered as a prominent reason to accelerate global warming.
Growing industrialization is also responsible for the release of waste by-products such as fly ash, rice husk ash, ground granulated blast furnace slags, which are pozzolanic in nature. Environmentally compatible dumping of these waste materials requires suitable techniques. The world earth summits also warned cement industry to switch over from Portland cement to a greener alternative binder with desirable structural as well as durability properties so that the increased emission of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere can be controlled.
Researchers globally explored the ancient construction materials and found that geopolymer materials were used in Egyptians pyramids during 2630 BCE–2611 BCE [2]. In this quest, Joseph Davidovits, a French material scientist proposed a term ‘geopolymer’ to represent a broad range of materials characterized by chains or networks of inorganic molecules and also pointed out the possibility of its use as a binder material in concrete. The special features of the geopolymer, such as the development of high early strength and better resistance to chemical attacks fascinated the scientific community. Geopolymer materials require raw materials which are rich in silicon (Si) and aluminum (Al) and alkaline activator solutions. The binding properties of these materials are obtained by the process of polymerization which primarily differentiates them from the conventional cement based binder materials. Geopolymeric materials don’t require cement as a binder which emits greenhouse gases, so it makes it an environmentally friendly material.
Geopolymers may address the issue of disposal of industrial waste materials by utilizing industrial by-products such as rice husk ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS), fly ash, silica fume, and red mud as a source material. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or potassium hydroxide (KOH) and sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) solution can be used to activate the source materials. Another important aspect of geopolymers is that water plays no significant role in the chemical reaction but helps in producing a workable mixture which reduces the water requirement [3]. Geopolymeric gel obtained from the polymerization process possess cementitious properties and act as a binder in geopolymer concrete [4], [5].
The curing process adopted for geopolymer concrete (GPC) differentiates it from conventional cement concrete. Instead of water curing, heat curing i.e. steam curing and air curing is generally used in geopolymer concrete. The heat curing process is generally used to activate the polymerization reaction. Geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature could not achieve desirable compressive strength [6], [7], [8]. Therefore most of the research on geopolymer concrete was conducted by using electric hot air oven technique for elevated temperature curing [9], [10]. The fly ash based geopolymer concrete when exposed to heat curing system could achieve desired mechanical properties [11], [12], [13], [14] but lacked in case of normal room temperature curing conditions [8], [15]. A significant share of research used heat cured conditions for curing of geopolymer concrete and the curing temperature was generally between 60 °C and 100 °C [10], [16], [17], [18], [19]
The heat curing mechanism requires special arrangement which may not be cost-effective and limit the GPC uses in precast construction practices. Therefore to broaden the scope of geopolymer based concrete in general construction use, researchers focussed their attention towards developing GPC at ambient temperatures which may be cost-effective as well as easy to practice.
Several Researchers observed that the mechanical strength and durability properties of geopolymer concrete can be significantly enhanced with the blending of ordinary Portland cement [20], ground granulated blast furnace slag [21], [22], nano-silica [23], [24], [25], [26] and Alccofine [6], [27] at ambient temperature curing.
This paper presents a comprehensive review of the enhancement of properties of geopolymer mortar and concrete with the inclusion of the various type of mineral admixtures at ambient curing conditions.
Section snippets
Significance of the study
Geopolymer materials are finding its way towards replacing conventional construction materials as green materials, but still, the research is limited to heat curing conditions. The scope of acceptability of geopolymer products such as geopolymer mortar, paste and concrete can be expanded if they can suitably and economically be developed at ambient temperature curing conditions. This study investigated the recent development in geopolymer products with the inclusion of various mineral
Constituent materials
The different type of aluminosilicate source materials, alkaline activators, and mineral admixtures are discussed hereafter.
Methods of curing
The methods of curing generally adopted in practice are discussed here.
Geopolymer mortar and concrete with different curing regimes
The development of microstructure and mechanical properties of the geopolymer matrix is significantly affected by the extent of geopolymerisation reaction which is temperature dependent. Generally, the geopolymerisation reaction is enhanced at a higher temperature than ambient [18]. Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete attains poor compressive strength [6], [11] and higher drying shrinkage [8], [11] at ambient cured regime than heat curing. Therefore, researchers adopted elevated curing at
Geopolymer mortar and concrete with mineral admixtures at ambient temperature curing
Following paragraphs discuss the effects on the properties of geopolymer concrete with the inclusion of OPC, GGBFS, Metakaolin, Nano-silica and Alccfine as a mineral admixture.
Conclusions
The current paper summarizes the comprehensive review on the scope of enhancement of mechanical strength and durability properties of geopolymer products at ambient temperature. Mineral additives use in geopolymer materials may be adopted as a suitable way of enhancing their properties at normal room temperature conditions. It has been observed that additives with high calcium content may be used but still more research is required to decide the optimum quantity. Using nanomaterials in future
Research gaps and suggestions for future research
The current study is focussed primarily on the effects of mineral admixtures on the properties of fly ash based geopolymer mortar and concrete. Authors put forward a few suggestions for the aspiring future researchers as follows.
- 1.
The investigations on the effects of mineral admixtures on various type of aluminosilicate source materials can be performed.
- 2.
Mineral admixtures can be used in combinations as a hybrid admixture to enhance the properties of geopolymer paste, mortar and concrete.
- 3.
The
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References (126)
- et al.
Microstructural and compositional change of NaOH-activated high calcium fly ash by incorporating Na-aluminate and co-existence of geopolymeric gel and C-S–H (I)
Cem. Concr. Res.
(2012) - et al.
Mineralogical and microstructural characterisation of alkali-activated fly ash/slag pastes
Cem. Concr. Compos.
(2003) - et al.
Early age properties of low-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete suitable for ambient curing
Procedia Eng.
(2015) - et al.
Behavior of low-calcium fly ash bottom ash based geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature
Ceram. Int.
(2015) - et al.
Effects of elevated temperatures on the thermal behavior and mechanical performance of fly ash geopolymer paste, mortar and lightweight concrete
Constr. Build. Mater.
(2014) - et al.
Effect of elevated temperatures on geopolymer paste, mortar and concrete
Cem. Concr. Res.
(2010) - et al.
The effect of temperature and duration of curing on the strength of fly ash based geopolymer mortar
Proc. Eng.
(2014) - et al.
Mechanical and microstructural properties of heat cured alkali-activated slag mortars
Mater. Des.
(2012) - et al.
Use of OPC to improve setting and early strength properties of low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete cured at room temperature
Cem. Concr. Compos.
(2015) - et al.
Structural performance of nano-silica modified fly-ash based geopolymer concrete
Constr. Build. Mater.
(2017)