Unified Structural Representation of the southern California crust and upper mantle

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.01.016Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We present a new 3D structural velocity model for the southern California crust and upper mantle.

  • The model incorporates tens of thousands of direct velocity measurements.

  • The model is enhanced using full 3D adjoint waveform tomography.

  • Simulation of an M 7.9 earthquake shows the impact of velocity structure on strong ground motions.

  • The 3D velocity structure of southern California reflects its complex tectonic history.

Abstract

We present a new, 3D description of crust and upper mantle velocity structure in southern California implemented as a Unified Structural Representation (USR). The USR is comprised of detailed basin velocity descriptions that are based on tens of thousands of direct velocity (Vp, Vs) measurements and incorporates the locations and displacement of major fault zones that influence basin structure. These basin descriptions were used to developed tomographic models of crust and upper mantle velocity and density structure, which were subsequently iterated and improved using 3D waveform adjoint tomography. A geotechnical layer (GTL) based on Vs30 measurements and consistent with the underlying velocity descriptions was also developed as an optional model component. The resulting model provides a detailed description of the structure of the southern California crust and upper mantle that reflects the complex tectonic history of the region. The crust thickens eastward as Moho depth varies from 10 to 40 km reflecting the transition from oceanic to continental crust. Deep sedimentary basins and underlying areas of thin crust reflect Neogene extensional tectonics overprinted by transpressional deformation and rapid sediment deposition since the late Pliocene. To illustrate the impact of this complex structure on strong ground motion forecasting, we simulate rupture of a proposed M 7.9 earthquake source in the Western Transverse Ranges. The results show distinct basin amplification and focusing of energy that reflects crustal structure described by the USR that is not captured by simpler velocity descriptions. We anticipate that the USR will be useful for a broad range of simulation and modeling efforts, including strong ground motion forecasting, dynamic rupture simulations, and fault system modeling. The USR is available through the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) website (http://www.scec.org).

Introduction

Recent advances in numerical methods and parallel computing technology have enabled large-scale 3D simulations of seismic wavefields in realistic earth models (e.g., Olsen et al., 1995, Komatitsch and Tromp, 1999, Komatitsch et al., 2004, Bielak et al., 2010). These simulations are able to capture the effects of basin amplification, resonance, wave focusing, and dynamic rupture propagation. Thus, they offer a physics-based alternative to attenuation relationships (e.g., Abrahamson and Silva, 1997, Abrahamson and Silva, 2008; Field, 2000, Boore and Atkinson, 2008) for forecasting the distribution of hazardous ground shaking during large earthquakes (e.g., Zhao et al., 2000, Tromp et al., 2005, Tarantola, 1984, Chen et al., 2007). These methods also provide an objective, quantitative means of using seismic observations to improve 3D earth models. The revised models, in turn, help make strong ground motion forecasts more accurate.

To facilitate these and other studies, we present a Unified Structural Representation (USR) of southern California (Fig. 1). The USR consists of two major components: a 3D description of seismic wavespeeds (Vp, Vs) and density (ρ), known as a community velocity model (CVM); and a 3D description of the major fault systems in the region, known as a community fault model (CFM). The CVM includes a framework of geologic horizons that define the various rock units in the region and integrates a wide range of direct observations that define velocity structure. These include tens of thousands of velocity measurements in boreholes, as well as constraints from seismic reflection and refraction studies in sedimentary basins. The basin structures are used to develop travel time tomographic models of the crust and upper mantle extending to a depth of 33 km, and a teleseismic shear wave model of the upper mantle to a depth of 150 km. This combined velocity model was then subjected to a series of 3D adjoint tomographic inversions that highlight areas of the starting model that were responsible for mismatches between observed and synthetic waveforms (Tape et al., 2009, Tape et al., 2010). Sixteen tomographic iterations, requiring 6800 fully 3D wavefield simulations, yielded perturbations to the starting model that have been incorporated into the current CVM. The second component of the USR is the CFM, which provides 3D descriptions of the major fault systems in southern California that are considered to pose earthquake hazards. These 3D fault representations are defined by surface geology, earthquake hypocentral locations, focal mechanisms, well, and seismic reflection data. The USR provides compatible fault and velocity models, in which the locations and displacements of major faults are explicitly represented in the velocity descriptions.

Section snippets

Tectonic history and structure

Southern California sits astride a tectonic plate boundary that has been active for at least 200 million years. Beginning in the Jurassic Period, subduction of oceanic crust beneath North America created the Sierra Nevada arc and associated igneous terrains, a widespread series of forearc deposits including the Great Valley sequence, and the Franciscan accretionary complex, which is exposed in the Coast Ranges (e.g., Hamilton, 1969, Ernst, 1970, Dickinson, 1981, Cowan and Bruhn, 1992). These

Development of a Unified Structural Representation

The USR incorporates a variety of different velocity constraints, ranging in resolution from 10-cm-scale borehole observations in shallow sedimentary sections to 3D tomographic models that describe the upper mantle at scales of tens of kilometers. These components must be assembled in a way that ensures their internal consistency. Thus, we developed a workflow for building the USR that begins with the development of structural representations of the basins and parameterization of their internal

Assembly of the USR

The upper solid surface of the USR is marked by topographic or bathymetric elevations. For bathymetry we use ETOPO-1 (Amante and Eakins, 2008) and, where available, measurements derived from seafloor reflectors of seismic surveys. For topography we used GTOPO30 (USGS, 1996). ETOPO-1 and GTOPO30 have resolutions of about 1.8 km and 0.9 km, respectively.

The various components of the USR, including the topography, basin representations, basement and Moho surfaces, tomographic crust and upper

Description

The primary velocity structures in the upper crust of southern California are the deep sedimentary basins. Average velocity functions for sediments within these basins all show general trends of increasing velocity with depth (Fig. 6A). Notably, the average velocity profiles for the Los Angeles, Ventura, and Santa Barbara basins are similar, reflecting that these basins contain comparable Neogene to recent stratigraphic sequences. The Inner California Borderland exhibits a similar velocity

Applications to earthquake simulations

A fundamental use for the USR is to provide the most accurate information available (faults and velocity structure) for earthquake simulations. These simulations, in turn, can be used to obtain better estimates of earthquake source models (e.g., Liu et al., 2004). The CVM has been tested with earthquake simulations (Komatitsh et al., 2004; Lovely et al., 2006; Tape et al., 2009, Graves and Aagaard, 2011) and with ambient noise cross correlations (Ma et al., 2008). A second purpose of the

Conclusion

We present a methodology for developing precise and internally consistent descriptions of Earth structure that span the range of wavespeed from low velocity sediments in the shallow subsurface to upper mantle structure. This involves the careful integration of many datasets, including borehole observations, seismic reflection and refraction surveys, and earthquake body and surface wave data. The workflow that we have developed for constructing the USR, involving development of basin

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Walter Mooney, Peter Shearer, and an anonymous reviewer for constructive comments that helped to improve the manuscript. This work was supported by the Southern California Earthquake Center, the National Science Foundation, and the U.S. Geological Survey. SCEC is funded by NSF Cooperative Agreement EAR-1033462 and USGS Cooperative Agreement G12AC20038. This work was also supported through NSF awards EAR-1226343 titled “Geoinformatics: Community Computational Platforms for

References (115)

  • G.I. Smith

    Holocene movement on the Garlock fault

    U. S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap.

    (1975)
  • B.T. Aagaard et al.

    Characterization of near-source ground motions with earthquake simulations

    Earthq. Spectra

    (2001)
  • N.A. Abrahamson et al.

    Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes

    Seismol. Res. Lett.

    (1997)
  • N.A. Abrahamson et al.

    Summary of the Abrahamson and Silva NGA ground-motion relations

    Earthq. Spectra

    (2008)
  • C.R. Allen

    San Andreas fault zone in San Gorgonio Pass, southern California

    Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.

    (1957)
  • C.R. Allen

    The modern San Andreas fault

  • C. Amante et al.

    ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute Global Relief Model: Procedures, Data Sources and Analysis

    (2008)
  • M. Anderson et al.

    Structural model of the San Bernardino basin, California, from analysis of gravity, aeromagnetic, and seismicity data

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (2004)
  • L. Astiz et al.

    Seismicity of the Garlock fault, California

    Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.

    (1983)
  • T. Atwater

    Implications of plate tectonics for the Cenozoic tectonic evolution of western North America

    Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.

    (1970)
  • J. Bielak et al.

    Earthquake ground motion and structural response in alluvial valleys

    J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.

    (1999)
  • J. Bielak et al.

    The ShakeOut earthquake scenario: verification of three simulation sets

    Geophys. J. Int.

    (2010)
  • P. Bird et al.

    Kinematics of present crust and mantle flow in southern California

    Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.

    (1984)
  • R. Bohannon et al.

    Upper crustal structure and Neogene tectonic development of the California continental borderland

    Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.

    (1998)
  • O. Bonamassa et al.

    Directional site resonances observed from aftershocks of the 18 October 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake

    Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.

    (1991)
  • D.M. Boore et al.

    Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s

    Earthq. Spectra

    (2008)
  • D.M. Boore et al.

    Site amplifications for generic rock sites

    Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.

    (1997)
  • M. Bouchon et al.

    Seismic response of a hill: the example of Tarzana, California

    Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.

    (1996)
  • C. Brankman

    Three-dimensional structure of the western Los Angeles and Ventura basins and implications for regional earthquake hazards

    (2009)
  • T.M. Brocher

    A regional view of urban sedimentary basins in Northern California based on oil industry compressional-wave velocity and density logs

    Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.

    (2005)
  • B.C. Burchfiel et al.

    Geology of Panamint Valley–Saline Valley pull-apart system, California: palinspastic evidence for low-angle geometry of a Neogene range bounding fault

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1987)
  • P. Chen et al.

    Full three-dimensional waveform tomography: a comparison between the scattering-integral and adjoint-wavefield methods

    Geophys. J. Int.

    (2007)
  • D.S. Cowan et al.

    Late Jurassic to early late Cretaceous geology of the U.S. cordillera

  • J.K. Crouch et al.

    Late Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Los Angeles basin and inner California borderland: a model for core complex-like crustal extension

    Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.

    (1993)
  • J.R. Curray et al.

    Geologic history of the mouth of the Gulf of California

  • C. DeMets et al.

    A revised estimate of Pacific–North America motion and implications for western North America plate boundary zone tectonics

    Geophys. Res. Lett.

    (1987)
  • Dibblee Jr., T.W., 1950–2005. Geologic map series, California [map], 1:24,000. Thomas W. Dibblee Jr. Geol. Found. Santa...
  • W.R. Dickinson

    Plate tectonics and the continental margin of California

  • R.K. Dokka et al.

    Role of the eastern California Shear Zone in accommodating Pacific–North American plate motion

    Geophys. Res. Lett.

    (1990)
  • D.S. Dreger et al.

    Broadband modeling of local earthquakes

    Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.

    (1990)
  • G. Ely et al.

    A Vs30-derived near-surface seismic velocity model

  • W.G. Ernst

    Tectonic contact between the Franciscan mélange and the Great Valley sequence—crustal expression of a late Mesozoic Benioff zone

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1970)
  • L.Y. Faust

    Seismic velocity as a function of depth and geologic time

    Geophysics

    (1951)
  • A. Fichtner et al.

    Full seismic waveform tomography for upper-mantle structure in the Australasian region using adjoint methods

    Geophys. J. Int.

    (2009)
  • E.H. Field

    A modified ground-motion attenuation relationship for southern California that accounts for detailed site classification and a basin-depth effect

    Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.

    (2000)
  • A. Frankel et al.

    A three-dimensional simulation of seismic waves in the Santa Clara valley, California, from the Loma Prieta aftershock

    Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.

    (1992)
  • G. Fuis et al.

    Crustal structure and tectonics of the Imperial Valley Region, California

  • H. Gilbert

    Crustal structure and signatures of recent tectonism as influenced by ancient terranes in the western United States

    Geosphere

    (2012)
  • R. Graves

    The seismic response of the San Bernardino basin region during the 2001 Big Bear Lake earthquake

    Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.

    (2008)
  • R.W. Graves et al.

    Testing long-period ground-motion simulations of scenario earthquakes using the Mw 7.2 El Mayor–Cucapah mainshock: evaluation of finite-fault rupture characterization and 3D seismic velocity models

    Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.

    (2011)
  • R.W. Graves et al.

    Ground-motion amplification in the Santa Monica area; effects of shallow basin-edge structure

    Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.

    (1998)
  • R. Graves et al.

    CyberShake: a physics-based seismic hazard model for southern California

    Pure Appl. Geophys.

    (2011)
  • W. Hamilton

    Mesozoic California and the under-flow of Pacific mantle

    Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.

    (1969)
  • E. Hauksson

    Crustal structure and seismicity distributions adjacent to the Pacific and north America plate boundary in southern California

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (2000)
  • M.L. Hill et al.

    San Andreas, Garlock, and Big Pine faults, California: a study of the character, history, and tectonic significance of their displacements

    Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.

    (1953)
  • J. Scott Hornafius et al.

    Timing and extent of Neogene tectonic rotation in the western Transverse Ranges, California

    Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.

    (1986)
  • J. Hubbard et al.

    Structure and seismic hazard of the Ventura Avenue anticline and Ventura fault, California: prospect for large, multisegment ruptures in the Western Transverse Ranges

    Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.

    (2014)
  • G.J. Huftile et al.

    Convergence rates across a displacement transfer zone in the western Transverse Ranges, Ventura Basin, California

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1995)
  • E.D. Humphreys et al.

    A kinematic model for the Late Cenozoic development of southern California crust and upper mantle

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1990)
  • L.K. Hutton et al.

    Seventy-seven years (1932–2009) of earthquake monitoring in southern California

    Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.

    (2010)
  • View full text