Elsevier

Journal of Energy Storage

Volume 41, September 2021, 102857
Journal of Energy Storage

Overview of the factors affecting the performance of vanadium redox flow batteries

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.102857Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The effects of the key parameters on redox flow battery performance are reviewed.

  • Electrode activation and felt compression are the most significant factors.

  • Electrolyte additive and flow field design are reasonably significant factors.

  • Electrolyte temperature and membrane are the least significant factors.

  • The parametric effects of all the factors is summarised in the matrix form.

Abstract

Redox flow batteries are being utilised as an attractive electrochemical energy storage technology for electricity from renewable generation. At present, the global installed capacity of redox flow battery is 1100 MWh. There are several parameters that significantly govern redox flow battery performance amongst which electrode activation, electrode material, felt compression, electrolyte additive, electrolyte temperature, membrane, and flow field design are notable. This review article presents an overview of the influence of individual components by comparing the performance of a parametrically modified cell with a default cell, which has 0% felt compression, inactivated electrode, zero electrolyte additives, and ambient condition operation. From the reviewed studies, electrode activation (thermal, chemical, laser perforation) and felt compression were identified as the most significant parameters. Electrolyte additive and flow field design were identified to be reasonably significant. Electrolyte temperature and membrane type were identified as the least significant amongst all the parameters. Based on this survey, a parametric matrix has been outlined that will aid researchers to identify appropriate parameters to focus research efforts onto improved redox flow battery performance.

Introduction

As the world's electricity sector progresses towards high levels of renewables generation asset adoption and deployment, energy storage is critical for power reliability. For grid-scale energy storage utilising batteries (hundreds of kWh to MWh sizing), redox flow batteries (RFBs) are viable for large-scale storage applications. This battery has attractive capabilities where the energy stored and power delivered can be controlled independently [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], which is highly useful to grid operators. The amount of the energy stored in the battery can be simply modulated by raising or lowering the quantity of electrolyte while the amount of power delivered can be modulated through appropriate battery sizing. This flexibility is ideal for the battery to be used for storing energy from renewable sources during surplus generation periods and load shifting to low generation, but high demand periods [1]. Some of the popular chemistries for redox flow batteries are vanadium-vanadium, iron-chromium, zinc-bromine, zinc-iron, and hydrogen-bromine. Amongst these chemistries, vanadium-based systems (i.e., vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs)) are the most popular chemistry, which are utilised given the vanadium's flexible oxidation states [6]. The advantage of flow batteries over other competitive systems such as lithium arises from the lower cost per kWh due to the utilisation of more abundantly available and cheaper materials resources. Fig. 1 shows the energy cost comparison of lithium-ion and lithium polysulphide against several other redox flow batteries [7]. When compared to lithium-ion, the energy costs of all redox flow batteries are lower. With the exception of vanadium redox flow battery, all redox flow batteries generally have lower energy cost relative to lithium polysulphide.

A typical flow battery (Fig. 2) has anolyte, catholyte, graphite flow field, carbon felt electrode, current collector, and separator. The anolyte and catholyte are pumped into the respective half cells. The graphite flow field directs the electrolyte flow through carbon felt electrode [8]. The carbon felt electrode provides the surface area for the occurrence of redox reaction [9]. The function of separator is to ensure zero species cross-over and uninterrupted hydronium ion transport.

During the redox reaction, the anolyte loses an electron and gets oxidised. This electron flows through the external circuit and reaches catholyte where the catholyte will accept the electron and gets reduced. The charging and the discharging processes are illustrated in Fig. 3 for the vanadium flow battery. For every electron transferred from the anolyte to the catholyte, a hydronium ion, H+ moves across the separator to maintain electroneutrality.

The performance of any battery in an electricity grid (or any other application) has to be reliable, predictable, and produced continually on demand during the battery's installed lifetime. Each battery chemistry has unique materials, physical design, and electrical properties, which affect that particular battery chemistry's performance levels and limitations. For flow batteries, the major parameters, which govern performance are electrode activation, felt compression, electrode material, electrolyte additive, electrolyte temperature, flow field design, and membrane characteristics.

Electrode activation can be performed by utilising a thermal, chemical, or laser-based technique. Thermal and chemical activations are generally about attaching different functional groups to the electrode surface [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. These functional groups are then utilised for specific redox chemistry changes required for the flow battery to work, through improved surface adherence of solution-based redox species for electron transfer reactions. For example, in the case of the vanadium system, oxygen-containing functional groups (hydroxyl and carboxyl groups) and nitrogen functional groups help to improve the electron transfer process by providing active sites for the oxidation of VO2+. The laser technique is utilised to vary the effect of pore size and pore density on the carbon felt, which has the concomitant effect of varying battery performance [17]. Felt compression is the effect of compressing the fibres of the electrode together to reduce the contact resistance between the current collector and the porous electrode material [18]. Electrolyte additives perform a major role by altering the properties of the electrolyte to sustain different operating conditions [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. Electrolyte temperature plays a considerable role in battery performance by controlling the ionic mobility of the redox species [24,25]. The flow field design on the graphite plate significantly improves the battery performance by altering the flow patterns of the electrolyte that flows through the carbon felt [26], [27], [28], [29]. The membrane also known as separator, on the other hand, has extensive control over the battery performance by regulating the ionic transport across the membrane [30,31]. Electrode material and thickness also play a considerable role in battery performance [32], [33], [34].

At a cell level, voltage efficiency, coulombic efficiency, and energy efficiency are three characteristic parameters typically used to evaluate a battery's performance. The voltage efficiency of the battery can be enhanced by reducing the ohmic, activation, and concentration overpotential. Coulombic efficiency can be improved by reducing species cross-over across the membrane. Since energy efficiency is the product of voltage and coulombic efficiency, it can also be improved simultaneously by reducing the overpotential and the species cross-over. All these performance parameters should be considered for any comparative studies on battery. We do, however, note that upon utilisation of any battery in a real-life system, the system energy efficiency is limited by other factors such as direct current (DC) or alternating current (AC) convertors, invertors, system hardware, and software designs. Typically, battery efficiencies are higher than those of the associated system efficiencies. For example, typically a battery efficiency is in the 95–99% ranges, whereas most commercial invertor systems operate in the 80–95% range. Hence battery storage system efficiencies are typically lower than the battery cell efficiencies due to these limitations.

Previous review articles on redox flow batteries have discussed the effects of different vanadium electrolytes, battery materials, cell designs, electrocatalysts, and etc. on battery performance [1,2,19,29,[35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45]]. Xu and co-workers reviewed the evaluation criteria for RFB and suggested system energy efficiency as the preferable criterion [1]. Almheiri and co-workers reviewed various designs in membraneless RFB [2]. Skyllas-Kazacos and co-workers reviewed different electrolyte additives reported in the literature and its specific role in VRFB operation [19]. Ke and co-workers reviewed different flow field designs and their roles in optimising non-uniform flow for rechargeable redox flow batteries [29]. Skyllas-Kazacos and co-workers reviewed the research trends on the VRFB electrode for the past 30 years and novel approaches to electrode development for VRFB [34]. Kim and co-workers reviewed different vanadium electrolytes and their effect on cell performance [35]. Minke and Turek reviewed the materials, system design, and modelling approach for VRFB specified in the literature and tried analysing the associated capital cost [36]. Walsh and co-workers reviewed a broad area that covers RFB design, modelling, components, performance, and finally the scale-up [37]. Chen and co-workers reviewed different membranes, electrodes, and cell configurations in RFB [38]. Jung and co-workers reviewed the recent progress and trends in sol-gel based alkoxysilane membranes for VRFB [40]. Jirabovornwisut and Arpornwichanop reviewed the cause and effect, measurement methods, and regeneration methods for electrolyte imbalance in VRFB [41]. Tasnim and co-workers reviewed all the components, design queues, and limiting factors for VRFB. They also reviewed current research works that have been performed to overcome the limiting factors [42]. Cho and co-workers reviewed different nanostructured metal and carbon-based electrocatalyst reported in the literature for a vanadium redox reaction [43]. Yuan and co-workers reviewed the degradation mechanism for VRFB cell and cell components. They also reviewed the diagnostic tool and mitigation strategies for degradation [45].

None of these aforementioned review articles however focus on the combined effects of different parameters on RFB cell performance. They instead focussed on individual parameter effects. However, in an RFB system, all of these effects are present simultaneously and hence the system performance will be different to cell performance. Fig. 4 summarises the energy efficiencies reported in 12 similar research articles that range from 78 to 88%. Future research and development efforts should be directed to improve the efficiency to above 90%, in line with battery industry and consumer expectations.

Due to the dearth of information on overall system efficiencies of flow batteries, our review paper combines the investigations on physical and chemical parameters (particularly those related to the cell synthesis and operation) to compile and explain the effects of each and every parameter on RFB performance. This approach can be used to optimise the battery system to enable operation at maximum efficiency and peak performance through understanding the influence of different physical and chemical components on the performance parameters. Table 1 lists the parameters considered for this study.

The effects that each parameter listed in Table 1 has on the cell performance, as reported in the literature, has been compiled and will be discussed in more detail in the sections below. The parameters in Table 1 are categorised into three categories, namely, most significant, reasonably significant, and least significant. Finally, a parametric matrix has been developed to identify the role of each parameter on the overall battery performance. The outcome of this review article and methodology can be utilised by the researchers working in the field of flow batteries to gain insights and optimise cell construction for maximum performance. It can also assist researchers in appropriate parameter selection to optimise the battery for their specified applications.

Section snippets

Electrode activation

In a vanadium redox flow battery, the vanadium redox reactions occur at the electrode surface. Carbonaceous materials with high surface areas are preferentially used in the current vanadium flow battery designs. The vanadium redox reaction is as follows:Positiveelectrode:VO2++H2OVO2++2H++e(Charge,Discharge)Negativeelectrode:V3++eV2+(Charge,Discharge)

To improve the surface chemistry, electrode activation techniques can be used to enhance the electrode wettability with the electrolyte

Felt compression

During cell assembly all the battery components are mechanically clamped together, with appropriate compression for the cell components, to reduce the contact resistance between porous materials and current collectors. Electrode compression (felt compression) has a significant influence on battery performance by controlling the pressure drop, tortuosity, and porosity. Generally, carbon felt electrodes are porous and this porosity will improve the electrolyte penetration. However, increasing the

Electrode material

The nature of the electrode material plays a significant role in providing active sites for electrochemical reactions. Conductivity of the electrode governs its body resistance and the contact resistance between the electrode and bipolar plate. Carbon cloth, carbon paper, and polyacrylonitrile (PAN) type carbon felt electrodes have been reported for use as electrode materials for aqueous redox flow batteries.

PAN type carbon felt electrodes are popular electrodes for redox flow battery

Electrolyte temperature

The electrolyte temperature or operating temperature of the cell plays a major role in maintaining the electrolyte stability and determining cell performance [68]. In cyclic voltammetry experiments, when the temperature is higher, the ions will move faster and collide with each other. This supports the ion in overcoming concentration overpotential, resulting in higher cathodic and anodic peak currents. Fig. 24 shows the variation of peak current ratio of negative and positive electrolyte with

Flow field design

There are generally two methods to regulate the electrolyte distribution in the flow batteries. One is the flow-through method and the other is the flow by method [8,73]. In flow-through method, the electrolyte flows through the carbon felt electrode where it does not have any specific flow path [73]. Flow by method has channels machined on the graphite plate to ensure lower pressure drop and effective electrolyte distribution through carbon felt [74]. Popular flow field designs include the

Membrane

The purpose of the membrane in the redox flow battery is to prevent the cross-mixing of catholyte and anolyte and allow only selective ions to pass through the membrane to maintain electroneutrality [76,77]. Membranes used in VRFB can be classified as an ion exchange membrane or a non-ionic porous membrane. Ion exchange membranes have functional groups for selective ion exchange whereas non-ionic porous membranes act as a physical barrier to ions of a larger ionic radius than the target ions.

Electrolyte additive

Flow batteries are prone to have low energy density given the limited solubility of salt, poor reversibility of kinetics, and evolution of hydrogen and oxygen. In the case of vanadium flow batteries, there are four oxidation states, namely, V(V), V(IV), V(III), and V(II). The stability of V(V) can be improved by increasing the sulphuric acid concentration or reducing the temperature whereas in case of other oxidation states such as V(IV), V(III), and V(II), the stability can be improved by

Parametric matrix

A comprehensive review of the parameter effects has helped us to outline a parametric matrix as shown in Fig. 38(a). The matrix represents the attributes of every parameter considered in this study. The parameter and its corresponding effects are depicted in the matrix. Increasing the felt compression of carbon felt electrode causes drop in porosity, rise in tortuosity, rise in pressure drop, and finally, drop in cell resistance when compared to the pristine electrode without compression. For

Conclusion

The potential of redox flow batteries for stationary energy storage from renewables have been investigated widely. This battery is foreseen as a potential solution for bulk electrochemical storage. Optimising the control parameters for this battery can help in constructing an efficient electrochemical storage system. This review has discussed the influence of different parameters on the vanadium redox flow battery performance where 3 key conclusions can be summarised:

  • 1

    Electrode activation and

Declaration of Competing Interest

✓ All authors have participated in (a) conception and design, or analysis and interpretation of the data; (b) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and (c) approval of the final version.

✓ This manuscript has not been submitted to, nor is under review at, another journal or other publishing venue.

✓ The authors have no affiliation with any organization with a direct or indirect financial interest in the subject matter discussed in the manuscript

✓ The

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the funding support from Indian Institute of Technology Madras in the form of New Faculty Start-up Grant (NFSG) and the support from joint PhD program between Indian Institute of Technology Madras and Swinburne University of Technology.

References (80)

  • L. Cao et al.

    A review of electrolyte additives and impurities in vanadium redox flow batteries

    J. Energy Chem.

    (2018)
  • M. Kim et al.

    Enhanced VRB electrochemical performance using tungsten as an electrolyte additive

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2017)
  • D. Kim et al.

    A high-temperature tolerance solution for positive electrolyte of vanadium redox flow batteries

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (2017)
  • C. Zhang et al.

    Effects of operating temperature on the performance of vanadium redox flow batteries

    Appl. Energy

    (2015)
  • Q. Xu et al.

    Performance of a vanadium redox flow battery with and without flow fields

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2014)
  • S. Maurya et al.

    Effect of flow field geometry on operating current density, capacity and performance of vanadium redox flow battery

    J. Power Sources

    (2018)
  • X. Ke et al.

    Redox flow batteries with serpentine flow fields: distributions of electrolyte flow reactant penetration into the porous carbon electrodes and effects on performance

    J. Power Sources

    (2018)
  • Y. Shi et al.

    Recent development of membrane for vanadium redox flow battery applications: a review

    Appl. Energy

    (2019)
  • L. Zeng et al.

    Anion exchange membranes for aqueous acid-based redox flow batteries: current status and challenges

    Appl. Energy

    (2019)
  • X.L. Zhou et al.

    A highly permeable and enhanced surface area carbon-cloth electrode for vanadium redox flow batteries

    J. Power Sources

    (2016)
  • C. Choi et al.

    A review of vanadium electrolytes for vanadium redox flow batteries

    Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.

    (2017)
  • C. Minke et al.

    Materials, system designs and modelling approaches in techno-economic assessment of all-vanadium redox flow batteries – A review

    J. Power Sources

    (2018)
  • L.F. Arenas et al.

    Engineering aspects of the design, construction and performance of modular redox flow batteries for energy storage

    J. Energy Storage

    (2017)
  • J. Balaji et al.

    Recent development of sol-gel based polymer electrolyte membrane for vanadium redox flow battery–A review

    Polym. Test.

    (2020)
  • T. Jirabovornwisut et al.

    A review on the electrolyte imbalance in vanadium redox flow batteries

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2019)
  • K. Lourenssen et al.

    Vanadium redox flow batteries: a comprehensive review

    J. Energy Storage

    (2019)
  • L.D. Brown et al.

    The effect of felt compression on the performance and pressure drop of all-vanadium redox flow batteries

    J. Energy Storage

    (2016)
  • Q. Wang et al.

    Experimental study on the performance of a vanadium redox flow battery with non-uniformly compressed carbon felt electrode

    Appl. Energy

    (2018)
  • A.M. Pezeshki et al.

    High performance electrodes in vanadium redox flow batteries through oxygen-enriched thermal activation

    J. Power Sources

    (2015)
  • K.J. Kim et al.

    The effects of surface modification on carbon felt electrodes for use in vanadium redox flow batteries

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (2011)
  • L. Eifert et al.

    Side reactions and stability of pre-treated carbon felt electrodes for vanadium redox flow batteries: a DEMS study

    Carbon N Y

    (2020)
  • H.-.M. Tsai et al.

    Preparation and electrochemical activities of iridium-decorated graphene as the electrode for all-vanadium redox flow batteries

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2012)
  • X. Wu et al.

    PbO2-modified graphite felt as the positive electrode for an all-vanadium redox flow battery

    J. Power Sources

    (2014)
  • S. Mehboob et al.

    Enhancing the performance of all-vanadium redox flow batteries by decorating carbon felt electrodes with SnO2 nanoparticles

    Appl. Energy

    (2018)
  • J.-.H. Lee et al.

    Effect of surface modification of carbon felts on capacitive deionization for desalination

    Carbon Lett.

    (2015)
  • A. Hassan et al.

    Enhancement of the electrochemical activity of a commercial graphite felt for vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB), by chemical treatment with acidic solution of K2Cr2O7

    J. Energy Storage

    (2019)
  • H.R. Jiang et al.

    A bi-porous graphite felt electrode with enhanced surface area and catalytic activity for vanadium redox flow batteries

    Appl. Energy

    (2019)
  • C. Flox et al.

    Thermo–chemical treatments based on NH3/O2 for improved graphite-based fiber electrodes in vanadium redox flow batteries

    Carbon N Y

    (2013)
  • T.-.C. Chang et al.

    Electrical, mechanical and morphological properties of compressed carbon felt electrodes in vanadium redox flow battery

    J. Power Sources

    (2014)
  • R. Jervis et al.

    In situ compression and X-ray computed tomography of flow battery electrodes

    J. Energy Chem.

    (2018)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text