A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method
Introduction
Supply Chain Management (SCM) has received recently considerable attention in both academia and industry. The major aims of SCM are to reduce supply chain (SC) risk, reduce production costs, maximize revenue, improve customer service, optimize inventory levels, business processes, and cycle times, and resulting in increased competitiveness, customer satisfaction and profitability (Chou and Chang, 2008, Ha and Krishnan, 2008, Heizer and Render, 2004, Monczka et al., 2001, Simchi-Levi et al., 2003, Stevenson, 2005).
One of the important activities for SC success is an effective purchasing function (Cakravastia and Takahashi, 2004, Chou and Chang, 2008, Giunipero and Brand, 1996, Porter and Millar, 1985). The purchasing function has received a great deal of attention in the SCM due to factors such as globalization, increased value added in supply and accelerated technological change. The purchasing function involves buying the raw materials, supplies and components for the organization. The most important activity of the purchasing function is the selection of appropriate supplier, since it brings significant savings for the organization (Haq & Kannan, 2006).
One of the well known studies on supplier selection belongs to Dickson (1966) who identified 23 important evaluation criteria for supplier selection. Weber, Current, and Benton (1991) reviewed and classified 74 articles addressed the supplier selection problem. de Boer, Labro, and Morlacchi (2001) identified four stages for supplier selection including definition of the problem, formulation of criteria, qualification, and final selection, respectively. They reviewed and classified MCDM approaches for supplier selection.
Several methodologies have been proposed for the supplier selection problem. The systematic analysis for supplier selection includes categorical method, weighted point method (Timmerman, 1986, Zenz, 1981), matrix approach (Gregory, 1986), vendor performance matrix approach (Soukup, 1987) vendor profile analysis (VPA) (Thompson, 1990), analytic hierarchy process (AHP) (Barbarosoglu and Yazgac, 1997, Narasimhan, 1983, Nydick and Hill, 1992), analytic network process (ANP) (Sarkis & Talluri, 2000), mathematical programming (Chaudhry et al., 1993, Pan, 1989, Rosenthal et al., 1995, Sadrian and Yoon, 1994, Weber and Current, 1993) and multiple objective programming (MOP) (Buffa and Jackson, 1983, Feng et al., 2001, Ghoudsypour and O’Brien, 1998, Sharma et al., 1989, Weber and Ellram, 1992).
Most of these methods do not seem to address the complex and unstructured nature and context of many present day purchasing decisions (de Boer, Van der Wegen, & Telgen, 1998). In many existing decision models in the literature, only quantitative criteria have been considered for supplier selection. Several influence factors are often not taken into account in the decision-making process, such as incomplete information, additional qualitative criteria and imprecision preferences (Chen et al., 2006, Zhang et al., 2009). Therefore, fuzzy set theory (FST) has been applied to supplier selection recently. Li et al., 1997, Holt, 1998 discussed the application of FST in supplier selection. Chen et al. (2006) extended the concept of TOPSIS method to develop a methodology for solving supplier selection problems in fuzzy environment. Haq and Kannan (2006) presented a structured model for evaluating the supplier selection for the rubber industry using AHP and the model is verified with the fuzzy AHP. Bayrak, Çelebi, and Taşkin (2007) presented a fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making approach to supplier selection based on fuzzy arithmetic operation. Chou and Chang (2008) presented strategy-aligned fuzzy simple multi-attribute rating technique (SMART) approach for solving the supplier selection problem from the perspective of strategic management of the SC. Chan, Kumar, Tiwari, Lau, and Choy (2008) presented fuzzy AHP to efficiently tackle both quantitative and qualitative decision factors involved in the selection of global supplier. Önüt, Kara, and Işık (2009) developed a supplier evaluation approach based on ANP and TOPSIS methods for the supplier selection.
This paper proposes an intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making with TOPSIS method for supplier selection problem. The importance of the criteria and the impact of alternatives on criteria provided by decision makers are difficult to precisely express by crisp data in the selection of supplier problem. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets introduced by Atanassov (1986) are suitable way to deal with this challenge and applied many decision-making problem under uncertain environment. In group decision-making problems, aggregation of expert opinions is very important to appropriately perform evaluation process. Therefore, IFWA operator is utilized to aggregate all individual decision makers’ opinions for rating the importance of criteria and the alternatives. The TOPSIS method considering both positive-ideal and negative-ideal solution is one of the popular methods in multi-attribute decision-making problem. Therefore, TOPSIS method combined with intuitionistic fuzzy set has enormous chance of success for supplier selection process.
Rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, brief description of intuitionistic fuzzy sets is given. Section 3 presents detailed description of intuitionsitic fuzzy TOPSIS method. In Section 4, a numerical example is demonstrated. Finally conclusion of this paper is presented in Section 5.
Section snippets
Intuitionistic fuzzy sets
Intuitionistic fuzzy set introduced by Atanassov (1986) is an extension of the classical FST, which is a suitable way to deal with vagueness. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets have been applied many areas such as; medical diagnosis (De et al., 2001, Szmidt and Kacprzyk, 2001, Szmidt and Kacprzyk, 2004), decision-making problems (Atanassov et al., 2005, Chen and Tan, 1994, Hong and Choi, 2000, Liu and Wang, 2007, Szmidt and Kacprzyk, 2002, Szmidt and Kacprzyk, 2003, Wang, 2009, Xu, 2007a, Xu, 2007b, Xu,
Intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS
Let A = {A1, A2, … , Am} be a set of alternatives and X = {X1, X2, … , Xn} be a set of criteria, the procedure for Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS method has been given as follows:
Step 1. Determine the weights of decision makers.
Assume that decision group contains l decision makers. The importance of the decision makers are considered as linguistic terms expressed in intuitionistic fuzzy numbers.
Let Dk = [μk, νk, πk] be an intuitionistic fuzzy number for rating of kth decision maker. Then the weight of kth
Numerical example
An automotive company is desired to select the most appropriate supplier for one of the key elements in its manufacturing process. After pre-evaluation, five suppliers have remained as alternatives for further evaluation. In order to evaluate alternative suppliers, a committee composed of three decision makers has been formed. Four criteria are considered as:
X1: Product quality.
X2: Relationship closeness.
X3: Delivery performance.
X4: Price.
Procedure for the selection of supplier contains the
Conclusions
This study presents a multi-criteria group decision making for evaluation of supplier using intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets are suitable way to deal with uncertainty. In the evaluation process, the ratings of each alternative with respect to each criterion and the weights of each criterion were given as linguistic terms characterized by intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Also intuitionistic fuzzy averaging operator was utilized to aggregate opinions of decision makers. After
References (67)
Intuitionistic fuzzy sets
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
(1986)- et al.
Vendor selection with price breaks
European Journal of Operational Research
(1993) - et al.
A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management
International Journal of Production Economics
(2006) - et al.
Handling multi criteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
(1994) - et al.
A decision support system for supplier selection based on a strategy-aligned fuzzy SMART approach
Expert System with Applications
(2008) - et al.
An application of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in medical diagnosis
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
(2001) - et al.
A review of methods supporting supplier selection
European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management
(2001) - et al.
Outranking methods in support of supplier selection
European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management
(1998) - et al.
An optimization model for concurrent selection of tolerances and suppliers
Computers and Industrial Engineering
(2001) Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and/or interval-valued fuzzy sets based on the Hausdorff metric
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
(2004)
A hybrid approach to supplier selection for the maintenance of a competitive supply chain
Expert Systems with Applications
Which contractor selection methodology?
International Journal of Project Management
Multi criteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
Similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on Hausdorff distance
Pattern Recognition Letters
Similarity measures on intuitionistic fuzzy sets
Pattern Recognition Letters
Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets
European Journal of Operational Research
Long term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: A case study for a telecommunication company
Expert Systems with Applications
Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets for fault-tree analysis on printed circuit board assembly
Microelectronics Reliability
Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
Intuitionistic fuzzy information – Applications to pattern recognition
Pattern Recognition Letters
QoS-aware web services selection with intuitionistic fuzzy set under consumer’s vague perception
Expert Systems with Applications
Distance measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets
Pattern Recognition Letters
A multiobjective approach to vendor selection
European Journal of Operational Research
Vendor selection criteria and methods
European Journal of Operational Research
Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making
Information Sciences
Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
An novel approach to supplier selection based on vague sets group decision
Expert Systems with Applications
Similarity measures on three kinds of fuzzy sets
Pattern Recognition Letters
Intuitionistic fuzzy sets
Intuitionistic fuzzy interpretations of multi-criteria multi-person and multi-measurement tool decision making
International Journal of Systems Science
An application of the analytic hierarchy process to the supplier selection problem
Production and Inventory Management Journal
A fuzzy approach method for supplier selection
Production Planning and Control: The Management of Operations
A goal programming model for purchase planning
Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management
Cited by (1282)
An innovative distance measure for quantifying the dissimilarity between Q-Rung orthopair fuzzy sets
2024, Decision Analytics JournalInterval-valued fermatean fuzzy based risk assessment for self-driving vehicles
2024, Applied Soft Computing