A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.039Get rights and content

Abstract

Supplier selection, the process of finding the right suppliers who are able to provide the buyer with the right quality products and/or services at the right price, at the right time and in the right quantities, is one of the most critical activities for establishing an effective supply chain. On the other hand, it is a hard problem since supplier selection is typically a multi criteria group decision-making problem involving several conflicting criteria on which decision maker’s knowledge is usually vague and imprecise. In this study, TOPSIS method combined with intuitionistic fuzzy set is proposed to select appropriate supplier in group decision making environment. Intuitionistic fuzzy weighted averaging (IFWA) operator is utilized to aggregate individual opinions of decision makers for rating the importance of criteria and alternatives. Finally, a numerical example for supplier selection is given to illustrate application of intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method.

Introduction

Supply Chain Management (SCM) has received recently considerable attention in both academia and industry. The major aims of SCM are to reduce supply chain (SC) risk, reduce production costs, maximize revenue, improve customer service, optimize inventory levels, business processes, and cycle times, and resulting in increased competitiveness, customer satisfaction and profitability (Chou and Chang, 2008, Ha and Krishnan, 2008, Heizer and Render, 2004, Monczka et al., 2001, Simchi-Levi et al., 2003, Stevenson, 2005).

One of the important activities for SC success is an effective purchasing function (Cakravastia and Takahashi, 2004, Chou and Chang, 2008, Giunipero and Brand, 1996, Porter and Millar, 1985). The purchasing function has received a great deal of attention in the SCM due to factors such as globalization, increased value added in supply and accelerated technological change. The purchasing function involves buying the raw materials, supplies and components for the organization. The most important activity of the purchasing function is the selection of appropriate supplier, since it brings significant savings for the organization (Haq & Kannan, 2006).

One of the well known studies on supplier selection belongs to Dickson (1966) who identified 23 important evaluation criteria for supplier selection. Weber, Current, and Benton (1991) reviewed and classified 74 articles addressed the supplier selection problem. de Boer, Labro, and Morlacchi (2001) identified four stages for supplier selection including definition of the problem, formulation of criteria, qualification, and final selection, respectively. They reviewed and classified MCDM approaches for supplier selection.

Several methodologies have been proposed for the supplier selection problem. The systematic analysis for supplier selection includes categorical method, weighted point method (Timmerman, 1986, Zenz, 1981), matrix approach (Gregory, 1986), vendor performance matrix approach (Soukup, 1987) vendor profile analysis (VPA) (Thompson, 1990), analytic hierarchy process (AHP) (Barbarosoglu and Yazgac, 1997, Narasimhan, 1983, Nydick and Hill, 1992), analytic network process (ANP) (Sarkis & Talluri, 2000), mathematical programming (Chaudhry et al., 1993, Pan, 1989, Rosenthal et al., 1995, Sadrian and Yoon, 1994, Weber and Current, 1993) and multiple objective programming (MOP) (Buffa and Jackson, 1983, Feng et al., 2001, Ghoudsypour and O’Brien, 1998, Sharma et al., 1989, Weber and Ellram, 1992).

Most of these methods do not seem to address the complex and unstructured nature and context of many present day purchasing decisions (de Boer, Van der Wegen, & Telgen, 1998). In many existing decision models in the literature, only quantitative criteria have been considered for supplier selection. Several influence factors are often not taken into account in the decision-making process, such as incomplete information, additional qualitative criteria and imprecision preferences (Chen et al., 2006, Zhang et al., 2009). Therefore, fuzzy set theory (FST) has been applied to supplier selection recently. Li et al., 1997, Holt, 1998 discussed the application of FST in supplier selection. Chen et al. (2006) extended the concept of TOPSIS method to develop a methodology for solving supplier selection problems in fuzzy environment. Haq and Kannan (2006) presented a structured model for evaluating the supplier selection for the rubber industry using AHP and the model is verified with the fuzzy AHP. Bayrak, Çelebi, and Taşkin (2007) presented a fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making approach to supplier selection based on fuzzy arithmetic operation. Chou and Chang (2008) presented strategy-aligned fuzzy simple multi-attribute rating technique (SMART) approach for solving the supplier selection problem from the perspective of strategic management of the SC. Chan, Kumar, Tiwari, Lau, and Choy (2008) presented fuzzy AHP to efficiently tackle both quantitative and qualitative decision factors involved in the selection of global supplier. Önüt, Kara, and Işık (2009) developed a supplier evaluation approach based on ANP and TOPSIS methods for the supplier selection.

This paper proposes an intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making with TOPSIS method for supplier selection problem. The importance of the criteria and the impact of alternatives on criteria provided by decision makers are difficult to precisely express by crisp data in the selection of supplier problem. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets introduced by Atanassov (1986) are suitable way to deal with this challenge and applied many decision-making problem under uncertain environment. In group decision-making problems, aggregation of expert opinions is very important to appropriately perform evaluation process. Therefore, IFWA operator is utilized to aggregate all individual decision makers’ opinions for rating the importance of criteria and the alternatives. The TOPSIS method considering both positive-ideal and negative-ideal solution is one of the popular methods in multi-attribute decision-making problem. Therefore, TOPSIS method combined with intuitionistic fuzzy set has enormous chance of success for supplier selection process.

Rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, brief description of intuitionistic fuzzy sets is given. Section 3 presents detailed description of intuitionsitic fuzzy TOPSIS method. In Section 4, a numerical example is demonstrated. Finally conclusion of this paper is presented in Section 5.

Section snippets

Intuitionistic fuzzy sets

Intuitionistic fuzzy set introduced by Atanassov (1986) is an extension of the classical FST, which is a suitable way to deal with vagueness. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets have been applied many areas such as; medical diagnosis (De et al., 2001, Szmidt and Kacprzyk, 2001, Szmidt and Kacprzyk, 2004), decision-making problems (Atanassov et al., 2005, Chen and Tan, 1994, Hong and Choi, 2000, Liu and Wang, 2007, Szmidt and Kacprzyk, 2002, Szmidt and Kacprzyk, 2003, Wang, 2009, Xu, 2007a, Xu, 2007b, Xu,

Intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS

Let A = {A1, A2,  , Am} be a set of alternatives and X = {X1, X2,  , Xn} be a set of criteria, the procedure for Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS method has been given as follows:

Step 1. Determine the weights of decision makers.

Assume that decision group contains l decision makers. The importance of the decision makers are considered as linguistic terms expressed in intuitionistic fuzzy numbers.

Let Dk = [μk, νk, πk] be an intuitionistic fuzzy number for rating of kth decision maker. Then the weight of kth

Numerical example

An automotive company is desired to select the most appropriate supplier for one of the key elements in its manufacturing process. After pre-evaluation, five suppliers have remained as alternatives for further evaluation. In order to evaluate alternative suppliers, a committee composed of three decision makers has been formed. Four criteria are considered as:

  • X1: Product quality.

  • X2: Relationship closeness.

  • X3: Delivery performance.

  • X4: Price.

Procedure for the selection of supplier contains the

Conclusions

This study presents a multi-criteria group decision making for evaluation of supplier using intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets are suitable way to deal with uncertainty. In the evaluation process, the ratings of each alternative with respect to each criterion and the weights of each criterion were given as linguistic terms characterized by intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Also intuitionistic fuzzy averaging operator was utilized to aggregate opinions of decision makers. After

References (67)

  • S.H. Ha et al.

    A hybrid approach to supplier selection for the maintenance of a competitive supply chain

    Expert Systems with Applications

    (2008)
  • G.D. Holt

    Which contractor selection methodology?

    International Journal of Project Management

    (1998)
  • D.H. Hong et al.

    Multi criteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory

    Fuzzy Sets and Systems

    (2000)
  • W.L. Hung et al.

    Similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on Hausdorff distance

    Pattern Recognition Letters

    (2004)
  • Z.Z. Liang et al.

    Similarity measures on intuitionistic fuzzy sets

    Pattern Recognition Letters

    (2003)
  • H.W. Liu et al.

    Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets

    European Journal of Operational Research

    (2007)
  • S. Önüt et al.

    Long term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: A case study for a telecommunication company

    Expert Systems with Applications

    (2009)
  • M.S. Shu et al.

    Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets for fault-tree analysis on printed circuit board assembly

    Microelectronics Reliability

    (2006)
  • E. Szmidt et al.

    Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets

    Fuzzy Sets and Systems

    (2000)
  • I.K. Vlachos et al.

    Intuitionistic fuzzy information – Applications to pattern recognition

    Pattern Recognition Letters

    (2007)
  • P. Wang

    QoS-aware web services selection with intuitionistic fuzzy set under consumer’s vague perception

    Expert Systems with Applications

    (2009)
  • W.Q. Wang et al.

    Distance measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets

    Pattern Recognition Letters

    (2005)
  • C.A. Weber et al.

    A multiobjective approach to vendor selection

    European Journal of Operational Research

    (1993)
  • C.A. Weber et al.

    Vendor selection criteria and methods

    European Journal of Operational Research

    (1991)
  • Z.S. Xu

    Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making

    Information Sciences

    (2007)
  • Z.S. Xu et al.

    Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making

    International Journal of Approximate Reasoning

    (2008)
  • D. Zhang et al.

    An novel approach to supplier selection based on vague sets group decision

    Expert Systems with Applications

    (2009)
  • C.Y. Zhang et al.

    Similarity measures on three kinds of fuzzy sets

    Pattern Recognition Letters

    (2006)
  • K.T. Atanassov

    Intuitionistic fuzzy sets

    (1999)
  • K. Atanassov et al.

    Intuitionistic fuzzy interpretations of multi-criteria multi-person and multi-measurement tool decision making

    International Journal of Systems Science

    (2005)
  • G. Barbarosoglu et al.

    An application of the analytic hierarchy process to the supplier selection problem

    Production and Inventory Management Journal

    (1997)
  • M.Y. Bayrak et al.

    A fuzzy approach method for supplier selection

    Production Planning and Control: The Management of Operations

    (2007)
  • F.P. Buffa et al.

    A goal programming model for purchase planning

    Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management

    (1983)
  • Cited by (1282)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text