Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001Get rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide a discussion of the transformative potential of blended learning in the context of the challenges facing higher education. Based upon a description of blended learning, its potential to support deep and meaningful learning is discussed. From here, a shift to the need to rethink and restructure the learning experience occurs and its transformative potential is analyzed. Finally, administrative and leadership issues are addressed and the outline of an action plan to implement blended learning approaches is presented. The conclusion is that blended learning is consistent with the values of traditional higher education institutions and has the proven potential to enhance both the effectiveness and efficiency of meaningful learning experiences.

Introduction

Online learning is pervading higher education, compelling educators to confront existing assumptions of teaching and learning in higher education. Indeed, leaders of higher education are challenged to position their institutions to meet the connectivity demands of prospective students and meet growing expectations and demands for higher quality learning experiences and outcomes. Given the increasing evidence that Internet information and communication technologies are transforming much of society, there is little reason to believe that it will not be the defining transformative innovation for higher education in the 21st century. Transformation of learning environments in higher education settings for an increasingly electronic world is critical to ensure that the benefits are fully realized (Williams, 2002). In agreement with Hicks, Reid, and George (2001), there are demands for universities to “provide for a larger and more diverse cross-section of the population, to cater for emerging patterns on educational involvement which facilitate lifelong learning and to include technology-based practices in the curriculum” (p. 143).

A source of this transformation stems from the ability of online learners to be both together and apart—and to be connected to a community of learners anytime and anywhere, without being time, place, or situation bound. Moreover, the increasingly prevalent practice of the convergence of text-based asynchronous Internet-based learning with face-to-face approaches is having a volatile impact on traditional campus-based institutions of higher education. To this point, the President of Penn State University cites the convergence of classroom and online education as “the single greatest unrecognized trend in higher education today” (Young, 2002, p. A33).

The purpose of this position paper is to discuss the emerging trend in higher education to blend text-based asynchronous Internet technology with face-to-face learning—often referred to as simply blended learning. We posit that blended learning is an effective and low-risk strategy which positions universities for the onslaught of technological developments that will be forthcoming in the next few years. As society and technology fundamentally alter the manner in which we communicate and learn, this inevitably alters how we think. This is being driven further by the expectation placed on higher education to meet the need for intellectual talent. Forms of communication and our ability to manage information challenge our cognitive abilities and the traditional classroom paradigm. Institutions of higher education need to discover their transformative potential. Internet information and communication tools provide flexibility of time and place and the reality of unbounded educational discourse. This does not represent the demise of the campus-based institution, but will cause us to recognize how best to utilize both face-to-face and online learning for purposes of higher education.

To begin, this paper will describe blended learning along with its capability to support meaningful learning outcomes. The core of the discussion, however, is on uncovering the transformative potential of blended learning approaches in higher education settings and providing an examination of developmental and leadership issues.

Section snippets

Blended learning described

Blended learning is both simple and complex. At its simplest, blended learning is the thoughtful integration of classroom face-to-face learning experiences with online learning experiences. There is considerable intuitive appeal to the concept of integrating the strengths of synchronous (face-to-face) and asynchronous (text-based Internet) learning activities. At the same time, there is considerable complexity in its implementation with the challenge of virtually limitless design possibilities

Meaningful educational experiences

The literature on the potential of Internet information and communication technology to support meaningful educational experiences has been well documented. For example, it has been widely argued in the literature that asynchronous computer-mediated conferencing supports flexibility, reflection, interpersonal and teamwork skill development, motivation, and collaborative learning environments—resulting in deep and meaningful understandings and communities of inquiry (e.g., Garrison & Anderson,

Not more of the same

One thing is certain, blended learning does not represent more of the same. It is not just finding the right mix of technologies or increasing access to learning, although a secondary outcome may be increased efficiency and convenience for students and professor. Blended learning inherently is about rethinking and redesigning the teaching and learning relationship. To paraphrase Marshall McLuhan, it is not enough to deliver old content in a new medium. We must seriously reflect on how to design

The transformative potential

As has been discussed, blended learning is an integration of face-to-face and online learning experiences—not a layering of one on top of the other. From this perspective, the Internet has been considered to be a disruptive technology that requires a careful consideration of the educational goals, structures, and processes (Archer, Garrison, & Anderson, 1999). There is evidence that blended learning has the potential to be more effective and efficient when compared to a traditional classroom

The front end: administration and development

Issues pertaining to the front end of blended learning (administration and development) fall into the following categories: policy, planning, resources, scheduling, and support.

Organizational and leadership issues

We hardly need to be reminded that higher education institutions, especially universities, are notorious resisters to change. However, some are carefully rethinking their undergraduate experience, drafting policy to guide technological innovation, and cautiously developing prototypes that will preserve the traditional values of higher education. It should be noted that the interest and early success of blended learning is due to the fact that it is an approach that can preserve and enhance the

Conclusions

It is inevitable that campus-based higher education institutions will adopt blended learning approaches in a significant way. As has been demonstrated by several institutions, once there is clear policy and strong leadership, the evolution will be quick (e.g., University of Central Florida). In a matter of a few short years, higher education institutions can be transformed in a manner consistent with their values and mitigating the fiscal and pedagogical challenges and deficiencies currently

References (18)

  • W. Archer et al.

    Adopting disruptive technologies in traditional universities: Continuing education as an incubator for innovation

    Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education

    (1999)
  • J. Collins

    Good to great: Why some companies make the leap… and others don't

    (2001)
  • D.R. Garrison et al.

    E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice

    (2003)
  • D.R. Garrison et al.

    A transactional perspective on teaching–learning: A framework for adult and higher education

    (2000)
  • Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2003, September). Critical factors in student satisfaction and success:...
  • Heterick, B., & Twigg, C. (2003, February). The Learning MarketSpace. (Online, retrieved on December 5, 2003 from...
  • M. Hicks et al.

    Enhancing on-line teaching: Designing responsive learning environments

    The International Journal for Academic Development

    (2001)
  • S.R. Hiltz

    Impacts of college level courses via synchronous learning networks: Some preliminary results

    Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks

    (1997)
  • B. Hudson

    Critical dialogue online: Personas, covenants, and candlepower

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (2428)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text