The effect of pipe diameter on the structure of gas/liquid flow in vertical pipes
Introduction
For application in a number of industries, from compact heat exchangers to large diameter deep-water risers in hydrocarbon production, extension of the current knowledge on gas/liquid flows in a wider range of pipe diameters is necessary. Especially in gas/oil industry, with the increase of oil demand and major discoveries of hydrocarbon fields becoming rarer in the conventional offshore, (water depth up to 500 m) the deeper water exploration is emerging. Risers employed for deep water are normally operated under friction dominated conditions. To minimise pressure losses they tend to be of diameters larger than those for which research data is available. However, it has been recognised that gas/liquid flow in such larger diameter pipes is different from that in smaller ones. For example, in such large diameter pipes (approximately >100 mm), it has been reported that the conventional Taylor bubble does not appear, Ohnuki and Akimoto (2000) and Omebere-Iyari (2006).
Although there are applications over a wide range of pipe diameters, few publications have reported systematically on the effect of pipe diameter on two-phase flow structures. Sekoguchi et al., 1985, Sekoguchi et al., 1992 and Ide et al. (1993) studied the effect of pipe diameter for annular flow using data taken from pipes of diameter from 0.5 mm to 26 mm. They investigated several parameters such as film thickness, the velocities/frequencies of what they termed liquid lumps, wave length and wave amplitude. For capillary tubes, Ide et al. found that the liquid lump velocity increases with decreasing pipe diameter but decreases suddenly at a pipe diameter of 2 mm for a constant liquid flow rate. They linked this with the change of wave structure having shorter wavelength and lower amplitude in pipes of diameter ⩽1.5–2 mm. Recent investigations by Jayanti et al. (1996) and Vijayan et al. (2001) shows that there is a definite effect of pipe diameter on the conditions at which flooding occurs. They examined pipes of 25, 67 and 99 mm diameter and proposed three mechanisms of flooding condition depending on the pipe diameter: one due to wave transportation for the smallest diameter pipes and the others linked to the transport of entrained droplets or churn-like motion of liquid film for larger ones.
This paper describes the effect of pipe diameter on parameters indicating flow structure by combining the results of time series of cross-sectionally averaged void fraction and pressure gradient from experimental work using a 19 mm internal diameter pipe and a data bank from 5 to 70 mm internal diameter pipes gathered from published work. Focus is on periodic structures in the slug, churn and annular flow patterns.
Section snippets
Flow pattern specific model for annular flow
Published models for predicting film thickness and the velocity of disturbance waves are applied to experimental results in the present work for the purpose of their validation. In a number of empirical equations the film thicknesses are correlated with liquid film Reynolds number as in the following example:where A and B are constants,
Here is liquid film mass flux, Dt is pipe diameter, ρl is liquid density, ηl is liquid dynamic viscosity, δ is film
Experimental facility
A schematic diagram of the experimental facility is shown in Fig. 1. This facility is of a ‘Double Closed Loop’ configuration, in which both gas and liquid are recirculated. The facility consists of a liquid ring compressor unit, a centrifugal pump, a heat exchanger, two cyclones, two measuring tanks, a buffer tank and a separator tank. The test section, made of transparent acrylic resin, has an internal diameter of 19 mm and is 6.87 m tall. In the test section, eight ring-type conductance probes
Results
Measurements were made of void fraction and pressure drop for gas superficial velocities of 1–33 m/s and liquid superficial velocities 0.03–0.65 m/s.
The effect of pipe diameter
The data from various pipe diameters have been gathered from sources listed in Table 1. Investigation was focused on the structure of slug and annular flow from the limitation of data bank. The data from much larger pipe diameter, for instance 127 mm employed by Omebere-Iyari (2006), have not been included at this stage since no slug flow was observed. It what follows the data is presented in terms of superficial velocities as the physical properties which appear in dimensionless groups have not
Conclusions
Time series of cross-sectional average void fraction were obtained by ring-type conductance probes mounted on a 19 mm pipe. The velocity of periodic structure was derived by cross correlation using information of two successive probes. The pressure gradient was also obtained simultaneously. Using these experimental results and a published data bank from 5 to 50 mm pipes at dimensionless axial distance >100 pipe diameters, i.e., considered as a fully developed flow, the effect of pipe diameter on
Acknowledgements
This work has been undertaken within the Joint Project on Transient Multiphase Flow (TMF3). The author(s) wish to acknowledge the contributions made to this project by the Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC), the Department of Trade and Industry and the following:- Advantica; AspenTech; BP Exploration; Chevron; ConocoPhillips; ENI; ExxonMobil; FEESA; Granherne/Subsea 7; Institutt for Energireknikk; Institut Français du Petrole; Norsk Hydro; Petrobas, Scandpower; Shell;
References (34)
- et al.
A physically based correlation for drop size in annular flow
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
(1991) Disturbance wave frequencies, velocities and spacing in vertical annular two-phase flow
Nucl. Eng. Des.
(1986)- et al.
Prediction of the interfacial shear-stress in vertical annular flow
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
(2009) Design and performance of a conductance probe for measuring the liquid fraction in two-phase gas–liquid flows
Flow Measure. Instrum.
(1998)- et al.
Phenomenological modelling of non-equilibrium flows with phase change
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
(1990) - et al.
Calculation of two-phase pressure drop for vertical upflow in narrow passages by means of a flow pattern specific model
Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng.
(1999) - et al.
Theoretical investigation of the diameter effect on flooding in countercurrent flow
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
(1996) - et al.
Investigation of flow development of co-currentgas-liquid vertical slug flow
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
(2009) Thin liquid films under simultaneous shear sand gravity forces
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
(1971)- et al.
Characteristics and behaviour of the interfacial wave on the liquid film in a vertical upward air–water two-phase annular flow
Nucl. Eng. Des.
(1993)
Experimental study on transition of flow pattern and phase distribution in upward air–water two-phase flow along a large vertical pipe
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
Gas–liquid interfacial structure and pressure drop characteristics of churn flow
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
A conductance probe for measuring liquid fraction in pipes and packed beds
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
Effect of tube diameter on flooding
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
Flow development in vertical annular flow
Chem. Eng. Sci.
Interfacial drag and film height for vertical annular flow
AIChE J.
Cited by (69)
Experimental study of swirling flow pneumatic liquid-carrying characteristics in the vortex tool inserted tube under liquid loading conditions
2023, Experimental Thermal and Fluid ScienceAn artificial neural network model for the prediction of entrained droplet fraction in annular gas-liquid two-phase flow in vertical pipes
2023, International Journal of Multiphase FlowExperimental investigation of different simulated formation water salinity in three-phase waxy crude oil-water-gas flow in horizontal pipes
2021, Journal of Petroleum Science and EngineeringCitation Excerpt :This is because pipe diameter only affects lower volumetric flow rates such as stratified and intermittent flow but does not give significant impact on annular flow (Kaji and Azzopardi, 2010; Ghajar and Bhagwat, 2014; and Jaloretto da Silva et al., 2017). This shows that pipe diameter only influenced the slug frequency rather than dictate the flow condition inside the pipe (Jepson and Taylor, 1993; and Kaji and Azzopardi, 2010). According to Weisman et al. (1979), the relative volumetric flow rates of gas and liquid are more critical in defining the flow pattern rather than pipe diameter.
A fluid dynamics perspective on the flow dependent performance of honey comb microbial fuel cells
2021, EnergyCitation Excerpt :High flow velocity resulted in increased pressure drop across the pipe with the smallest diameter, thus causing a turbulent flow of liquid through the pipe. Internal diameters of pipes were varied from 20 mm to 70 mm and the two-phase fluid flow was estimated by Kaji and Azzopardi, [21]. They reported that as the pipe diameters increased, the velocity gradients decreased.