Surface modification and characterization of carbonaceous adsorbents for the efficient removal of oil pollutants

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.05.066Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The surfaces of activated carbon and multiwall carbon nanotubes were modified with benign oxidizing agents.

  • The impact of various different combinations of green oxidizing agents was investigated in detail.

  • Both carbonaceous adsorbents responded well to the functionalization and showed encouraging adsorptive removal of BTX.

Abstract

In this study, the impact of different oxidizing agents on the structural integrity of activated carbon (AC) and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) was studied for the removal of BTX from aqueous solution. Seven different combinations of green oxidizing agents (mild organic acids) in conjugation with NaOCl (basic oxidizing agent) were used. The modified adsorbents were analyzed by Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET) surface area analyzer, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Boehm titration, Raman spectroscopy, thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), x-ray diffraction (XRD), zeta potential, and variable pressure field emission scanning electron microscope (VPFESEM). The results suggested that the carbonaceous sorbents modified with combination of citric acid tartaric acid, malic acid and salicylic acid (CTMS-I) showed increased surface area (O-AC: 871.67 m2/g, O-MWCNTs: 336.37 m2/g) and total pore volume (O-AC: 0.59 cm3/g, O-MWCNTs: 0.04 cm3/g), with the significantly improved thermal stability. Preliminary batch adsorption experiments conducted using the present prepared O-AC and O-MWCNTs, showed an improved performance towards the adsorption of BTX, compared with other available reported adsorbents in the literature.

Introduction

Water contamination by oil pollutants (BTX) is a serious environmental issue that is growing with the increased industrialization. There are several remedial technologies namely distillation, extraction, absorption, adsorption, and membrane separation etc. have been used. But adsorption is believed to be the better performing technology for the removal of targeted pollutants even in trivial concentration. The carbon-based nanomaterials are found to be the most promising sorbents because of their large surface areas and well-developed porosity, and unique surface chemistry etc. Among these carbonaceous sorbents bulk (AC) and discrete structures (CNTs) are influential adsorbents for the removal of these aromatic pollutants [1].

Since, the pristine nanomaterials exhibit low sorption capacity due to surface inertness and limited solubility [2], therefore, in order to efficiently remove the active surface species such as benzene, toluene, and xylene (BTX) and improve the interactions between sorbent and sorbate, the surface activity of these carbon-based nanomaterials need to be enhanced by employing covalent and non-covalent modification. In non-covalent approach, the structure of nanotubes is not much affected but the weak interactions between nanotubes and targeted pollutant might be held responsible for low uptake. Oxidation is the most widely accepted and economical way of chemical modification to solve the problems of surface heterogeneity and impurity content [[3], [4], [5]]. Type of oxidizing agents, their concentration, operating temperature, exposure time, and sonication power (specifically for nanotubes) are the governing factors that affect the extent/severity of change in surface chemistry of these nanomaterials. Various strong oxidizing agents such as H2SO4, HNO3, H2O2, SOCl2, KMnO4, and ozone have been used to carry out wet chemical oxidation and their impact has been well studied and reported. These harsh oxidizing agents severely affected the micropore structure of activated carbon, shorten the length of nanotubes and generate the defects in the graphitic structure [6,7].

Mohammad et al. 2016 treated activated carbon with strong oxidizing agents such as KOH and subsequently with ammonia to introduced basic surface functional groups for the removal of benzene and toluene [8]. Nonetheless, they managed to remove only 50% of these oil pollutants. Similar results have been reported by Li et al. (2011) where NH3 treated AC yielded only 26.5% removal of o-Xylene [9]. Moreover, Lu et al. (2008) modified carbon nanotubes with different oxidizing agents namely HNO3, H2SO4, HCl, and NaOCl. They substantiated that the NaOCl modified nanotubes out performed harsh oxidizing agents [10]. It is due to the fact that the harsh oxidizing agents contribute in the impairment of structure of the potential sorbents which may lead to low uptake of targeted pollutants, therefore, it is reasonable to propose that the use of mild oxidizing agents can lead to a successful modification without significant structural damage.

Environmental friendly, low molecular weight organic acids as mild oxidizing agents have the ability to modify the surface of the sorbents without causing much structural defects towards their application for the removal of organic contaminants. Easy biodegradability, makes them nontoxic for aquatic life and dispersing ability signifies their role in un-entanglement of ropes of nanotubes [[11], [12], [13]]. Gao et al. suggested that mild oxidizing agents (citric acid, oxalic acid, and malic acid) facilitate the desorption of aromatic compounds and play their role in the degradation of hydrophobic pollutants [14]. Sun et al. modified biochar with mild organic acids namely citric acid and malic acid and proved the enhancement in porosity/surface chemistry and surface interactions with increased sorption of aromatic compound [15]. In the recent study, Alozie et al. (2018) employed citric acid, malic acid, and oxalic acid, individually for the removal of Cr (IV) and reported that the removal of targeted pollutant depends on the reducing capacity of the said mild oxidizing agents [16].

In this work, we performed a systematic study of the chemical oxidation of AC and MWCNTs by various combinations of benign oxidizing agents that possess different degrees of oxidation capacity. These benign oxidizing agents introduce oxygen containing functional groups over the surface of carbonaceous sorbents. These surface functional groups are pertinent in tailoring the surface chemistry of these nanomaterials by increasing the surface area and establishing a porous structure in them. These contributing factors improve the sorption of benzene, toluene, and xylene by electrostatic interactions, π-π interactions, and hydrogen bonding depending upon the pH of background solution [17]. Details pertaining to the literature on the comparative characteristic analysis of activated carbon and MWCNTs with varying mild oxidizing agents are very scarce. Additionally, a little effort has been made to analyze and compare the influence of these surface functional groups on the sorptive behavior towards oil pollutants namely benzene, toluene, and p-xylene etc.

Section snippets

Chemicals

The carbon based nanomaterials namely activated carbon (Purity: ≥ 98%, -100 mesh particle size, vapor pressure: < 0.1 mmHg, autoignition temperature: 850 °C), multiwall carbon nanotubes (Purity: ≥ 98%, Avg. diameter: 9.5 nm ×1 μm, density: 2.1 g/mL), oxidizing agents such as sodium hypochlorite (Purity: ≥ 99.5%), benzoic acid (Purity: ≥ 99.5%), citric acid (Purity: ≥ 99.5%), formic acid (Purity: ≥ 95%), fumaric acid (Purity: ≥ 98%), maleic acid (Purity: ≥ 99.5%), malic acid (Purity: ≥ 99%),

Pore structure characterization

The textural properties of carbon-based nanomaterials play a pertinent role in the sorption of hydrophobic organic compounds. The pristine carbonaceous samples have low physical properties due to the presence of high amount of impurities. These impurities block the surface-active sites and reduce the adsorption capacity of the sorbent. On the other hand, oxidation introduces the porosity in the structure of activated carbon and open the end caps of nanotubes which results in increased surface

Conclusion

In the present work, systematic investigation on the surface modification of activated carbon and multiwall carbon nanotubes for the adsorptive removal of benzene, toluene, and p-xylene was conducted respectively. Seven different combinations of mild oxidizing agents were selected based on the oxygen containing functional groups attached to the surface of carbonaceous adsorbents. Among the investigated combinations, citric acid, tartaric acid, malic acid, and salicylic acid (CTMS-I) modified

Acknowledgment

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Malaysia in the form of URIF project (0153AA-G19).

References (38)

Cited by (22)

  • A comprehensive guide for characterization of adsorbent materials

    2023, Separation and Purification Technology
    Citation Excerpt :

    For adsorbent materials the temperature range used in these analyses depends on the material but normally lies between 0 and 1000 °C [81,86,183]. TGA/DTA are thermoanalytical analysis most frequently applied in adsorbents, including carbonaceous materials [59,171,183], minerals-based materials [184,185] and synthetic polymers [100,186] and nanocomposites [86], in which researchers identify peaks of weight loss at certain temperatures and ascribe them to the loss of specific constituents of the material. The first degradation peak normally occurs at 100 °C, in which the adsorbents lose their moisture, since water molecules are adsorbed physically by weak hydrogen bonds.

  • Content and morphology of lead remediated by activated carbon and biochar: A spectral induced polarization study

    2021, Journal of Hazardous Materials
    Citation Excerpt :

    The XRD patterns of AC and biochar samples are shown in Fig. 6. For AC, there is a well-defined peak at 2θ = 26° and two broad humps at 2θ = 20–30° and 40–50°, which suggest the presence of a SiO2 crystalline phase and an amorphous graphite structure (Anjum et al., 2019; Tomul et al., 2020; Rubio et al., 2007), respectively (Fig. 6a). Biochar displays both two broad humps and multiple intense and sharp diffraction peaks, which suggest the presence of amorphous carbon and crystallized quartz, respectively (Gabhi et al., 2017; Yao et al., 2011) (Fig. 6b).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text