Numerical study of two-bucket Savonius wind turbine cluster
Introduction
Recently wind attracted more investment globally than any other non-fossil fuel based technology, including hydro and nuclear power (United Nations June, 2008). Although horizontal-axis wind turbines (HAWTs) are most commonly used in wind farms today, a large amount of land is required to separate each wind turbine from the adjacent turbines׳ wakes. This limits the power extracted from HAWT farms. In contrast, vertical-axis wind turbines (VAWTs) efficiency increases when they are placed close together (Dabiri, 2011).
Two types of VAWTs are mainly used, Savonius and Darrieus wind turbines. The Savonius turbine is one of the simplest turbines. It produces the lowest noise level compared to all other wind turbines as it works at low tip speed ratio (λ) (Shigetomi et al., 2011). Aerodynamically, it is a drag type device, consisting of two or three buckets. Because of the curvature, the buckets experience less drag when moving against the wind than when moving with the wind (Wikipedia). The differential drag causes the Savonius turbine to spin even at low wind speeds. In the symmetric drag position the flow attachment to the convex surface of the advancing blade produces a low pressure region above it to pull the blade in torque adding direction. Savonius turbines extract much less of the wind power (15–20%) compared to other similarly sized lift type VAWTs (Darrieus wind turbine rotor efficiency is 35%) (Shigetomi et al., 2011, Sheldahl et al., 1977) and that is only one third of Betz׳s limit of 59.3%.
Experimental studies have been carried out to improve the performance of the Savonius wind turbine rotor by changing the number of blades. The two bucket configurations have better aerodynamic performance than the three bucket configurations shown in Fig. 1. The three bucket configuration has a higher minimum static torque than a two bucket configuration. Vertical arrangement of two sets of Savonius rotors (two buckets), one above the other on the same shaft, with a relative phase angle 90o has higher power output, higher stability of the auto start-up characteristics, and lower cyclic torsion during rotation (Sheldahl et al., 1977). Performance improvement was also done by investigating bucket overlap, gap width, shape of the bucket and reduction of the anti-rotation torque of the rotor using curtains or ducts (Sheldahl et al., 1977, Altan et al., 2008, Kirke, 2006). The static torque performance is improved by increasing the overlap ratio. The torque and the power performance of the rotor reaches a maximum at an overlap ratio of 0.1–0.15 (Fujisawa, 1992).
Combining multiple Savonius turbines in the horizontal plane enhances their performance in particular configurations. Power improvement interactions occur due to the Magnus effect that bends the main stream behind the upstream turbine providing additional rotation to the downstream turbine, and the periodic coupling of local flow between the two turbines associated with vortex shedding and cyclic pressure fluctuations (Zhou and Rempfer, 2013). Previous studies on closely arranged Savonius rotors showed that the coupling effect is a function of the gap distance, relative direction of rotation and relative phase angle between the rotors. Counter rotating rotors with relative phase angle (φ) equal to 90° and a gap distance of 0.2–0.4 of the rotor diameter have the highest power coefficient (Xiaojing et al., 2012). However for φ equal to 0° the power coefficient is drastically lowered. Two rotors rotating in the same direction have an enhanced average power coefficient at reduced gap distances and the angle φ has no significant effect. For two oblique rotors the effect of the relative phase angle is not significant in all layouts (Xiaojing et al., 2012).
For a wind farm to produce the highest possible power output, the number of turbines that can be installed in the available plot of land has to be maximized, this means that the gap distance between turbines has to be reduced. In this study, in order to be independent on the relative phase angle (which is not possible to be kept without many expenses on additional electro-mechanical control systems) clusters of Savonius wind turbines having the same direction of rotation are adopted. The minimum gap distances corresponding to the highest average power coefficient for closely positioned turbines are investigated. Any effect of (φ) is not considered and the two rotors are set at (φ) equal to 0°. The flow field around a single rotor and clusters of two oblique rotors is analyzed to determine the best angular position and gap distance of the downstream rotors in parallel and oblique arrangements. A triangular shaped efficient three turbine cluster is developed in order to construct efficient Savonius wind farms.
Section snippets
Numerical simulation model
The unsteady turbulent flow around the Savonius rotor requires a great care in building the CFD model. In order to obtain the necessary aerodynamic coefficients, a numerical model capable of producing a solution independent of the time-step size, convergence limits, and other pertinent modeling conditions is developed. In this study a two dimensional CFD simulation model is used since the rotor cross-section is similar along its height (Zhou and Rempfer, 2013, Xiaojing et al., 2012). The
Single rotor
In this section, both static and dynamic numerical simulations for the single Savonius rotor are performed for validation. Grid independency and turbulence model sensitivity studies are performed by comparison with experimental data (Sheldahl et al., 1977).
Conclusion
In this study the performance of a single vertical axis Savonius wind turbine and clusters of two and three turbines are determined by numerical simulation. The aim of these numerical simulations is to investigate the enhancement in Savonius VAWTs performance in multiple turbine configurations. This enhancement is used to develop an efficient cluster of Savonius turbines to be used as a building unit for efficient VAWT farms. The numerical results for the single turbine compare very well with
References (23)
- et al.
An experimental study on improvement of a Savonius rotor performance with curtaining
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
(2008) On the torque mechanism of Savonius rotors
J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
(1992)- et al.
The Prediction of Laminarization with a Two-Equation Model of Turbulence!
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
(1972) - et al.
Numerical investigation of conventional and modified Savonius wind turbines
Renew. Energy
(2013) - et al.
2D CFD Modeling of H-Darrieus wind turbines using a transition turbulence model
Energy Procedia
(2014) - et al.
Optimal blade shape of a modified savonius turbine using an obstacle shielding the returning blade
Energy Convers. Manag.
(2011) - et al.
Interactive flow field around two savonius turbines
Renew. Energy
(2011) - et al.
Numerical study of detailed flow field and performance of Savonius wind turbines
Renew. Energy
(2013) - United Nations Environment Program News Centre, June 2008. Clean energy investments charge forward despite financial...
Potential order-of-magnitude enhancement of wind farm power density via counter-rotating vertical-axis wind turbine arrays
J. Renew. Sustain. Energy
(2011)
Cited by (105)
A comparative analysis of 2-D and 3-D simulation for savonius hydrokinetic turbine array
2024, Ocean EngineeringPower prediction of a Savonius wind turbine cluster considering wind direction characteristics on three sites
2023, Journal of Cleaner ProductionPerformance investigation of a solar updraft tower concept with downdraft windcatcher
2023, Energy Conversion and ManagementOptimization and performance study of bidirectional Savonius tidal turbine cluster with deflectors
2023, Energy Conversion and Management