Elsevier

Materials & Design

Volume 32, Issue 2, February 2011, Pages 535-549
Materials & Design

Influence of friction stir welding process and tool parameters on strength properties of AA7075-T6 aluminium alloy joints

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.025Get rights and content

Abstract

The aircraft aluminium alloys generally present low weldability by traditional fusion welding process. The development of the friction stir welding has provided an alternative improved way of satisfactorily producing aluminium joints, in a faster and reliable manner. In this present work, the influence of process and tool parameters on tensile strength properties of AA7075-T6 joints produced by friction stir welding was analysed. Square butt joints were fabricated by varying process parameters and tool parameters. Strength properties of the joints were evaluated and correlated with the microstructure, microhardness of weld nugget. From this investigation it is found that the joint fabricated at a tool rotational speed of 1400 rpm, welding speed of 60 mm/min, axial force of 8 kN, using the tool with 15 mm shoulder diameter, 5 mm pin diameter, 45 HRc tool hardness yielded higher strength properties compared to other joints.

Introduction

Aluminium alloy AA7075 (Al–Zn–Mg–Cu) is one of the strongest aluminium alloys in industrial use today. Its high strength-to weight ratio, together with its natural aging characteristics, makes it attractive for a number of aircraft structural applications [1]. The alloy derives its strength from precipitation of Mg2Zn and Al2CuMg phases. A major problem with this alloy is that it is not fusion weldable. It is extremely sensitive to weld solidification cracking as well as heat-affected zone (HAZ) liquation cracking due to the presence of copper. While it is possible to overcome the problem of weld solidification cracking using a suitable non-heat-treatable aluminium alloy filler (for example, Al–Mg or Al–Si), the resulting joint efficiencies are unacceptably low [2]. Further, oxidation and/or vaporization of zinc present several problems during welding, such as porosity, lack-of-fusion, and hazardous fumes. Therefore, use of alloy AA7075 is currently limited to applications that do not involve welding [3].

During friction stir welding (FSW), a rotating tool moves along joint interface, generates heat and results in recirculating flow of plasticized material near the tool surface. This softened material is subjected to extrusion by the tool pin rotational and traverse movements leading to formation of friction stir processing (FSP) zone [4]. The formation of FSP zone is affected by the material flow behaviour under the action of rotating tool. However, the material flow behaviour is predominantly influenced by the material properties such as yield strength, ductility and hardness of the base metal, tool design, and FSW process parameters. Compared to fusion welding techniques, friction stir welding strongly reduces the presence of distortions and residual stresses [5], [6], [7].

Hatamleh and Singh [8] have reported the effect of shot-peened and laser-peened on weld microstructure and mechanical properties of AA7075-T6 aluminium alloy joints. The metallographic section show a classic weld nugget region and the stirring marks, commonly denoted as ‘‘onion rings,” typically found in this region of the weld. A more recent investigation by Cai et al. [9] revealed that the grains in the nugget zone are not 3d equiaxial but 2d rod-like. The grain structure in Thermo-Mechanical Affected Zone (TMAZ) region was elongated and distorted due to the mechanical action from the welding tool. The heat-affected zone was unaffected by the mechanical effects from the welding tool, and the grain structure in that region resembles the parent material grain structure.

There have been lot of efforts to understand the effect of process parameters on material flow behaviour, microstructure formation and mechanical properties of friction stir welded joints. Finding the most effective parameters on properties of friction stir welds as well as realizing their influence on the weld properties has been major topics for researchers [10], [11], [12]. The influence of some of the important parameters such as axial tool pressure (F), rotational speed (N) and traverse speed (S), on weld properties have been investigated. The combined effects of process parameters and tool parameters on FSP formation and tensile strength properties are hitherto not reported. Hence, in this investigation an attempt has been made to understand the effect of tool parameters and process parameters on FSP zone formation and related tensile strength properties of friction stir welded AA 7075-T6 aluminium alloy joints.

Section snippets

Experimental work

Rolled plates of 5 mm thick, AA7075-T6 aluminium alloy base metal, were cut to the required size (300 mm × 150 mm) by power hacksaw cutting and milling. Square butt joint configuration (300 mm × 300 mm) was prepared and the direction of welding was normal to the rolling direction of the base plates. The joint dimensions are shown in Fig. 1. Single pass welding procedure was followed to fabricate the joints. The chemical composition and mechanical properties of base metal are presented in Table 1 and

Macrostructure

Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7, Table 8, Table 9, show the effects of process and tool parameters on macrostructure of the friction stir welded joints. It is generally known that the fusion welding of aluminium alloys accompanied by the defects like porosity, slag inclusion, solidification cracks, etc., deteriorates the weld quality and joint properties. Usually, friction stir welded joints are free from solidification related defects since, there is no melting takes place during welding

Discussion

From the experimental results the macrostructure, microstructure, and joint strength, it was found that the joint fabricated using 1400 rpm, 60 mm/min, 8 kN, 15 mm, 5 mm, and 45 HRc exhibited superior tensile strength compared to the other joints. The reasons for the better performance of these joints are explained below.

Conclusions

  • (1)

    The joint fabricated using the FSW process parameters of 1400 rpm (tool rotational speed), 60 mm/min (welding speed), 8 kN (axial force), with the tool parameters of 15 mm (shoulder diameter), 5 mm (pin diameter), 45 HRc (tool hardness) yielded higher strength properties compared to other joints.

  • (2)

    The maximum strength properties of 315 MPa yield strength, 373 MPa of tensile strength, 397 MPa of notch tensile strength, 203 HV of hardness and 77% of joint efficiency respectively was attained for the joint

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar, India for extending the facilities of Material Testing Laboratory to carry out this investigation. The authors wish to place their sincere thanks to Clean Technology Division of Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India, New Delhi for financial support rendered through a R&D Project No. MoEF1-9/2005-CT. Authors would like to thank Mr. E. Balamurugan, Post Graduate

References (28)

  • K. Elangovan et al.

    Influences of tool pin profile and tool shoulder diameter on the formation of friction stir processing zone in AA6061 aluminium alloy

    Mater Des

    (2008)
  • G. Padmanaban et al.

    Selection of FSW tool pin profile, shoulder diameter and material for joining AZ31B magnesium alloy – an experimental approach

    Mater Des

    (2009)
  • Abhay K. Jha et al.

    Metallurgical studies on cracked Al–5.5Zn–2.5Mg–1.5Cu aluminum alloy injector disc of turbine rotor

    J Fail Anal Prev

    (2008)
  • V. Balasubramanian et al.

    Effect of post weld aging treatment on fatigue behavior of pulsed current welded AA7075 aluminum alloy joints

    J Mater Eng Perform

    (2008)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text