Elsevier

Medical Image Analysis

Volume 58, December 2019, 101552
Medical Image Analysis

Generative adversarial network in medical imaging: A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2019.101552Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The number of publications in medical imaging using adversarial training scheme are increasing rapidly.

  • By surveying 150 published articles (including preprints), we have observed the effectiveness of adversarial training in all canonical tasks in medical image analysis.

  • Generative adversarial networks are most popular in medical image synthesis and are used for data augmentation to alleviate the data scarcity and overfitting problem.

  • Well trained discriminator can be regarded as a learned prior for the normal images so that it can be used as a regularizer.

  • Other potential applications of GANs such as image captioning, cross modality translation, automatic Magnetic resonance protocol generation have also been discussed.

Abstract

Generative adversarial networks have gained a lot of attention in the computer vision community due to their capability of data generation without explicitly modelling the probability density function. The adversarial loss brought by the discriminator provides a clever way of incorporating unlabeled samples into training and imposing higher order consistency. This has proven to be useful in many cases, such as domain adaptation, data augmentation, and image-to-image translation. These properties have attracted researchers in the medical imaging community, and we have seen rapid adoption in many traditional and novel applications, such as image reconstruction, segmentation, detection, classification, and cross-modality synthesis. Based on our observations, this trend will continue and we therefore conducted a review of recent advances in medical imaging using the adversarial training scheme with the hope of benefiting researchers interested in this technique.

Introduction

With the resurgence of deep learning in computer vision starting from 2012 (Krizhevsky et al., 2012), the adoption of deep learning methods in medical imaging has increased dramatically. It is estimated that there were over 400 papers published in 2016 and 2017 in major medical imaging related conference venues and journals (Litjens et al., 2017). The wide adoption of deep learning in the medical imaging community is due to its demonstrated potential to complement image interpretation and augment image representation and classification. In this article, we focus on one of the most interesting recent breakthroughs in the field of deep learning - generative adversarial networks (GANs) - and their potential applications in the field of medical imaging.

GANs are a special type of neural network model where two networks are trained simultaneously, with one focused on image generation and the other centered on discrimination. The adversarial training scheme has gained attention in both academia and industry due to its usefulness in counteracting domain shift, and effectiveness in generating new image samples. This model has achieved state-of-the-art performance in many image generation tasks, including text-to-image synthesis (Xu et al., 2017), super-resolution (Ledig et al., 2017), and image-to-image translation (Zhu et al., 2017).

Unlike deep learning which has its roots traced back to the 1980s (Fukushima and Miyake, 1982), the concept of adversarial training is relatively new with significant recent progress (Goodfellow et al., 2014). This paper presents a general overview of GANs, describes their promising applications in medical imaging, and identifies some remaining challenges that need to be solved to enable their successful application in other medical imaging related tasks.

To present a comprehensive overview of all relevant works on GANs in medical imaging, we searched databases including PubMed, arXiv, proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), SPIE Medical Imaging, IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), and International conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning (MIDL). We also incorporated cross referenced works not identified in the above search process. Since there are research publications coming out every month, without losing generality, we set the cut off time of the search as January 1st, 2019. Works on arXiv that report only preliminary results are excluded from this review. Descriptive statistics of these papers based on task, imaging modality and year can be found in Fig. 1.

The remainder of the paper is structured as follows. We begin with a brief introduction of the principles of GANs and some of its structural variants in Section 2. It is followed by a comprehensive review of medical image analysis tasks using GANs in Section 3 including but not limited to the fields of radiology, histopathology and dermatology. We categorize all the works according to canonical tasks: reconstruction, image synthesis, segmentation, classification, detection, registration, and others. Section 4 summarizes the review and discusses prospective applications and identifies open challenges.

Section snippets

Vanilla GAN

The vanilla GAN (Goodfellow et al., 2014) is a generative model that was designed for directly drawing samples from the desired data distribution without the need to explicitly model the underlying probability density function. It consists of two neural networks: the generator G and the discriminator D. The input to G, z is pure random noise sampled from a prior distribution p(z), which is commonly chosen to be a Gaussian or a uniform distribution for simplicity. The output of G, xg is expected

Applications in medical imaging

There are generally two ways GANs are used in medical imaging. The first is focused on the generative aspect, which can help in exploring and discovering the underlying structure of training data and learning to generate new images. This property makes GANs very promising in coping with data scarcity and patient privacy. The second focuses on the discriminative aspect, where the discriminator D can be regarded as a learned prior for normal images so that it can be used as regularizer or

Discussion

In the years 2017 and 2018, the number of studies applying GANs has risen significantly. The list of these papers reviewed for our study can be found on our1 GitHub repository.

About 46% of these papers studied image synthesis, with cross modality image synthesis being the most important application of GANs. MR is ranked as the most common imaging modality explored in the GAN related literature. We believe one of the reasons for the

Declaration of Competing Interest

We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

References (258)

  • Armanious, K., Küstner, T., Nikolaou, K., Gatidis, S., Yang, B., 2018a. Retrospective correction of rigid and non-rigid...
  • Armanious, K., Mecky, Y., Gatidis, S., Yang, B., 2018b. Adversarial inpainting of medical image modalities....
  • Armanious, K., Yang, C., Fischer, M., Küstner, T., Nikolaou, K., Gatidis, S., Yang, B., 2018c. Medgan: medical image...
  • S.G. Armato III et al.

    Data from LIDC-IDRI

    Cancer Imaging Arch

    (2015)
  • L. Ballerini et al.

    A color and texture based hierarchical k-NN approach to the classification of non-melanoma skin lesions

    Color Medical Image Analysis

    (2013)
  • S. Balocco et al.

    Standardized evaluation methodology and reference database for evaluating IVUS image segmentation

    Comput. Med. Imaging Graph.

    (2014)
  • C.F. Baumgartner et al.

    Visual feature attribution using Wasserstein GANs

  • Baur, C., Albarqouni, S., Navab, N., 2018b. Melanogans: high resolution skin lesion synthesis with GANs....
  • N. Bayramoglu et al.

    Towards virtual H&E staining of hyperspectral lung histology images using conditional generative adversarial networks

    Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    (2017)
  • N. Bayramoglu et al.

    Towards virtual H&E staining of hyperspectral lung histology images using conditional generative adversarial networks

    International Conference on Computer Vision

    (2017)
  • Beers, A., Brown, J., Chang, K., Campbell, J.P., Ostmo, S., Chiang, M.F., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., 2018. High-resolution...
  • Ben-Cohen, A., Klang, E., Raskin, S.P., Soffer, S., Ben-Haim, S., Konen, E., Amitai, M.M., Greenspan, H., 2018....
  • A. Bentaieb et al.

    Adversarial stain transfer for histopathology image analysis

    IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging

    (2018)
  • C. Bermudez et al.

    Learning implicit brain MRI manifolds with deep learning

    Medical Imaging 2018: Image Processing

    (2018)
  • Berthelot, D., Schumm, T., Metz, L., 2017. Began: boundary equilibrium generative adversarial networks....
  • L. Bi et al.

    Synthesis of positron emission tomography (pet) images via multi-channel generative adversarial networks (GANs)

    Molecular Imaging, Reconstruction and Analysis of Moving Body Organs, and Stroke Imaging and Treatment

    (2017)
  • Bodnar, C., 2018. Text to image synthesis using generative adversarial networks....
  • Bowles, C., Chen, L., Guerrero, R., Bentley, P., Gunn, R., Hammers, A., Dickie, D.A., Hernández, M.V., Wardlaw, J.,...
  • C. Bowles et al.

    Modelling the progression of alzheimer’s disease in MRI using generative adversarial networks

    Medical Imaging 2018: Image Processing

    (2018)
  • O. Breuleux et al.

    Quickly generating representative samples from an RBM-derived process

    Neural Comput.

    (2011)
  • Brock, A., Donahue, J., Simonyan, K., 2018. Large scale GAN training for high fidelity natural image synthesis....
  • A. Budai et al.

    Robust vessel segmentation in fundus images

    Int. J. Biomed. Imaging

    (2013)
  • E. Bullitt et al.

    Vessel tortuosity and brain tumor malignancy: a blinded study1

    Acad. Radiol.

    (2005)
  • F. Calimeri et al.

    Biomedical data augmentation using generative adversarial neural networks

    International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks

    (2017)
  • H. Chang et al.

    Pairedcyclegan: Asymmetric style transfer for applying and removing makeup

    2018 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

    (2018)
  • C. Chen et al.

    Semantic-aware generative adversarial nets for unsupervised domain adaptation in chest x-ray segmentation

  • Chen, X., Konukoglu, E., 2018. Unsupervised detection of lesions in brain MRI using constrained adversarial...
  • Y. Chen et al.

    Efficient and accurate MRI super-resolution using a generative adversarial network and 3d multi-level densely connected network

    International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention

    (2018)
  • H. Choi et al.

    Generation of structural mr images from amyloid pet: application to mr-less quantification

    J. Nucl. Med

    (2017)
  • M.J. Chuquicusma et al.

    How to fool radiologists with generative adversarial networks? A visual turing test for lung cancer diagnosis

  • CIHI, 2017. Wait times for priority procedures in Canada....
  • D.S.o.t. Clinical Practice Committee

    Informed consent for medical photographs

    Genet. Med.

    (2000)
  • N.C. Codella et al.

    Skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection: achallenge at the 2017 international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI), hosted by the international skin imaging collaboration (ISIC)

    Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018), 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on

    (2018)
  • J.P. Cohen et al.

    Distribution matching losses can hallucinate features in medical image translation

  • Costa, P., Galdran, A., Meyer, M.I., Abràmoff, M.D., Niemeijer, M., Mendonça, A.M., Campilho, A., 2017a. Towards...
  • P. Costa et al.

    End-to-end adversarial retinal image synthesis

    IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging

    (2017)
  • A. Creswell et al.

    Generative adversarial networks: an overview

    IEEE Signal Process. Mag.

    (2018)
  • A. Crimi et al.

    Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries: First International Workshop, Brainles 2015, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2015, Munich, Germany, October 5, 2015, Revised Selected Papers

    (2016)
  • Cubuk, E.D., Zoph, B., Mane, D., Vasudevan, V., Le, Q.V., 2018. Autoaugment: learning augmentation policies from data....
  • Bo Dai et al.

    Towards diverse and natural image descriptions via a conditional GAN

  • Cited by (1189)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text