Molecular Cell
Volume 81, Issue 20, 21 October 2021, Pages 4258-4270.e4
Journal home page for Molecular Cell

Article
Repeated strand invasion and extensive branch migration are hallmarks of meiotic recombination

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2021.08.003Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Highlights

  • Meiotic recombination often involves template switching between sister and homolog

  • Crossovers and noncrossovers both involve synthesis-dependent strand annealing

  • Branch migration drives crossover-specific double Holliday junction formation

  • Holliday junction resolution is associated with strand removal and resynthesis

Summary

Currently favored models for meiotic recombination posit that both noncrossover and crossover recombination are initiated by DNA double-strand breaks but form by different mechanisms: noncrossovers by synthesis-dependent strand annealing and crossovers by formation and resolution of double Holliday junctions centered around the break. This dual mechanism hypothesis predicts different hybrid DNA patterns in noncrossover and crossover recombinants. We show that these predictions are not upheld, by mapping with unprecedented resolution parental strand contributions to recombinants at a model locus. Instead, break repair in both noncrossovers and crossovers involves synthesis-dependent strand annealing, often with multiple rounds of strand invasion. Crossover-specific double Holliday junction formation occurs via processes involving branch migration as an integral feature, one that can be separated from repair of the break itself. These findings reveal meiotic recombination to be a highly dynamic process and prompt a new view of the relationship between crossover and noncrossover recombination.

Keywords

meiosis
homologous recombination
gene conversion
branch migration
crossover
noncrossover
strand invasion
end extension
Saccharomyces
double Holliday junction

Data and code availability

  • Sequencing data are deposited at the Sequence Read Archive (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) under BioProject ID: PRJNA721091.

  • Underlying data for all figures are in Data S1, a Microsoft Excel workbook. References to Data S1 in the text use the following format: Data S1.x, where x is the worksheet number. Plots of individual tetrad genotypes are in Data S2. Sequences of the wild-type and SNP-containing recombination intervals are in Data S3 and S4, respectively. Full Southern blot images are deposited at Mendeley Data: https://doi.org/10.17632/j2jpj3p29f.1.

  • This paper does not report original code.

  • Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.

Cited by (0)

2

Lead contact