Creating the Feedback Loop: Closed-Loop Neurostimulation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2013.08.006Get rights and content

Section snippets

Key points

  • Closed-loop stimulation may be superior to open loop therapy by reducing the impact of DBS on cognitive processes that depend on coordinated neuronal oscillations.

  • Understanding the relationship between the gross patient behavior (or severity of disease) and a neuronal signal that is under the influence of external stimulation is fundamental to using the signal in a control system.

  • A closed loop system extracts a particular feature of a biological signal that has a desired reference value

Rationale for closed-loop stimulation: Parkinson disease

Open-loop DBS is effective for treating the motor signs of Parkinson disease, but the side effects of this therapy and its inefficiencies may be diminished within a closed-loop system. Side effects of open-loop DBS experienced by some patients include impaired cognition, speech, gait, and balance.15 Open-loop DBS could potentially disrupt decision making, learning, and cognitive association through its effect on LFP oscillations of the brain. Open-loop DBS therapy was developed before an

Restoring the desired state: a role for closed-loop stimulation

A central challenge for closed-loop therapy is the definition of a therapeutic or optimal state that neurostimulation attempts to maintain or restore. Therefore, closed-loop systems incorporate a single or multiple set points, that is, reference values corresponding to the desired state. Returning to the example of optimizing behavioral goals, each of these set points could correspond to a different behavioral intention, such as walking, talking, or writing.

The goal of closed-loop DBS in

Available signals

The availability of reliably detectable biosignals capable of driving feedback is essential to a closed-loop neuromodulation system. In current open-loop systems, the patient’s clinical status and the provider’s assessment of the clinical status via physical examination provides the feedback to regulate neuromodulation. Although effective and the basis for newer neuromodulation models, this approach may be overly subjective/observer dependent, time intensive, overly consumptive of battery

Feature Extraction

The purpose of feature extraction is to transform the time series data for successive processing and/or improved computational efficiency. For example, time series data could be transformed from the time domain into the frequency domain, thus changing the meaning of the data stream from when an event occurs to how frequently an event occurs. Neuronal ensembles may use frequency coding to communicate, and therefore transformation of data into the frequency domain can be considered translation of

Closing the loop: DBS parameter interventions

Current DBS system neurostimulation consists of delivering a train of biphasic pulses with adjustable parameters (amplitude, pulse width, and frequency). This train is spatially applied across a cathode and an anode that are adjusted according to the size of the stimulation electrode array. The charge is deposited at the cathode, the negative pole, and the current flows from the cathode to the anode.132 Safety of the DBS is ensured because of a net zero current application across the biphasic

Alternate applications

Although this article has focused on movement disorders, the principles involved in system design, signal sources, feature extraction, signal classification, and effector control are applicable to virtually any neuropsychiatric disease neuromodulation system under development.

The most work on closed-loop neurostimulation has been done in the area of epilepsy and signal classification algorithm design for prediction of seizure onset.144 Such work has led to the first human implanted seizure

Closing remarks

Closed-loop neurostimulation is an interdisciplinary science incorporating disciplines of clinical neurosciences and electrical engineering. Given the importance of neuronal oscillations in the cooperative functioning of brain ensembles, the appeal for a neurostimulation system with a small electrical footprint is evident. Thus, closed-loop stimulation is preferable to open-loop stimulation for its less disruptive impact on cognitive processes that depend on coordinated neuronal oscillations.

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (144)

  • A.O. Hebb et al.

    Transient and state modulation of beta power in human subthalamic nucleus during speech production and finger movement

    Neuroscience

    (2012)
  • C. Lettieri et al.

    Deep brain stimulation: subthalamic nucleus electrophysiological activity in awake and anesthetized patients

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2012)
  • N. Suthana et al.

    Percepts to recollections: insights from single neuron recordings in the human brain

    Trends Cogn Sci

    (2012)
  • C. Tsiokos et al.

    200–300Hz movement modulated oscillations in the internal globus pallidus of patients with Parkinson’s Disease

    Neurobiol Dis

    (2013)
  • M.J. Cook et al.

    Prediction of seizure likelihood with a long-term, implanted seizure advisory system in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: a first-in-man study

    Lancet Neurol

    (2013)
  • T. Yamamoto et al.

    On-demand control system for deep brain stimulation for treatment of intention tremor

    Neuromodulation

    (2013)
  • B. Rosin et al.

    Closed-loop deep brain stimulation is superior in ameliorating parkinsonism

    Neuron

    (2011)
  • M.D. Holmes et al.

    Neuronal activity in human right lateral temporal cortex related to visuospatial memory and perception

    Brain Res

    (1996)
  • A.A. Kühn et al.

    The relationship between local field potential and neuronal discharge in the subthalamic nucleus of patients with Parkinson’s disease

    Exp Neurol

    (2005)
  • A.H. Costa et al.

    Adaptive time–frequency analysis based on autoregressive modeling

    Signal Process

    (2011)
  • M. Le Van Quyen et al.

    Comparison of Hilbert transform and wavelet methods for the analysis of neuronal synchrony

    J Neurosci Methods

    (2001)
  • M. Le Van Quyen et al.

    Analysis of dynamic brain oscillations: methodological advances

    Trends Neurosci

    (2007)
  • M. Fatourechi et al.

    EMG and EOG artifacts in brain computer interface systems: a survey

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2007)
  • G. Schalk et al.

    Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs): detection instead of classification

    J Neurosci Methods

    (2008)
  • F. Faradji et al.

    Plausibility assessment of a 2-state self-paced mental task-based BCI using the no-control performance analysis

    J Neurosci Methods

    (2009)
  • FDA. Medtronic activa tremor control system P960009. 1997. Available at:...
  • R. Pahwa et al.

    Long-term evaluation of deep brain stimulation of the thalamus

    J Neurosurg

    (2006)
  • G. Deuschl et al.

    A randomized trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease

    N Engl J Med

    (2006)
  • F.M. Weaver et al.

    Bilateral deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy for patients with advanced Parkinson disease

    JAMA

    (2009)
  • Z.H. Kiss et al.

    The Canadian multicentre study of deep brain stimulation for cervical dystonia

    Brain

    (2007)
  • A.G. Rouse et al.

    A chronic generalized bi-directional brain–machine interface

    J Neural Eng

    (2011)
  • M.M. Shanechi et al.

    Neural population partitioning and a concurrent brain-machine interface for sequential motor function

    Nat Neurosci

    (2012)
  • R.D. Flint et al.

    Accurate decoding of reaching movements from field potentials in the absence of spikes

    J Neural Eng

    (2012)
  • K.J. Miller et al.

    Decoupling the cortical power spectrum reveals real-time representation of individual finger movements in humans

    J Neurosci

    (2009)
  • Z. Wang et al.

    Decoding a bistable percept with integrated time–frequency representation of single-trial local field potential

    J Neural Eng

    (2008)
  • M.I. Hariz et al.

    Multicenter study on deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: an independent assessment of reported adverse events at 4 years

    Mov Disord

    (2008)
  • L.A. Johnson et al.

    Sleep spindles are locally modulated by training on a brain-computer interface

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2012)
  • T. Masquelier et al.

    Oscillations, phase-of-firing coding, and spike timing-dependent plasticity: an efficient learning scheme

    J Neurosci

    (2009)
  • J. Fell et al.

    The role of phase synchronization in memory processes

    Nat Rev Neurosci

    (2011)
  • S. Miocinovic et al.

    Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation

  • T. Hashimoto et al.

    Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus changes the firing pattern of pallidal neurons

    J Neurosci

    (2003)
  • S. Makeig et al.

    Evolving signal processing for brain computer interfaces

    Proc IEEE

    (2012)
  • J.A. Perge et al.

    Intra-day signal instabilities affect decoding performance in an intracortical neural interface system

    J Neural Eng

    (2013)
  • J.D. Simeral et al.

    Neural control of cursor trajectory and click by a human with tetraplegia 1000 days after implant of an intracortical microelectrode array

    J Neural Eng

    (2011)
  • BrainGate2: feasibility study of an intracortical neural interface system for persons with tetraplegia. Available at:...
  • L.R. Hochberg et al.

    Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm

    Nature

    (2012)
  • C. De Hemptinne et al.

    Exaggerated phase-amplitude coupling in the primary motor cortex in Parkinson disease

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2013)
  • N.F. Ince et al.

    High accuracy decoding of movement target direction in non-human primates based on common spatial patterns of local field potentials

    PLoS One

    (2010)
  • J.D. Wander et al.

    Distributed cortical adaptation during learning of a brain-computer interface task

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2013)
  • J. Lopez-Azcarate et al.

    Coupling between beta and high-frequency activity in the human subthalamic nucleus may be a pathophysiological mechanism in Parkinson’s disease

    J Neurosci

    (2010)
  • Cited by (82)

    • Closed-loop systems

      2024, Handbook of Digital Technologies in Movement Disorders
    • Modern views of machine learning for precision psychiatry

      2022, Patterns
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, ML can play a guiding role in online adaptive stimulation.365,366,367 For instance, the feedback loop can analyze the neural signal’s oscillatory patterns or other reliably detectable biosignals (e.g., biochemcial, electromyographic, and mechanical signals) to classify or detect the critical brain state for delivery of closed-loop neurostimulation.368 Additionally, reinforcement learning can be applied to learn a state-action value function to identify the best excitability brain state, where the state corresponds to the neural activity (e.g., the amplitude of evoked potentials, characteristics of brain connectivity) and the action corresponds to on/off stimulation mode.367,369

    • The modulatory effect of self-paced and cued motor execution on subthalamic beta-bursts in Parkinson's disease: Evidence from deep brain recordings in humans

      2022, Neurobiology of Disease
      Citation Excerpt :

      The widespread use of DBS as a treatment option has sparked attempts to further improve its efficacy. New closed-loop systems that continuously supply the implanted stimulator with updated settings, based on the analysis of feedback signal related to the patient's current clinical condition, are a promising future venue of DBS in PD patients (Hebb et al., 2014). In other words, rather than delivering fixed stimulation all the time, feedback signal related to the patient's current clinical condition would guide aDBS.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text