Single-element interferometer
Introduction
Interferometers are phase-sensitive devices for testing optical elements [1]. Standard two-beam interferometers are difficult to implement in a vibration-insensitive apparatus as required by commercial applications. There are some alternative interferometers that are not sensitive to vibrations. One of these is the point-diffraction interferometer (see e.g. [2] and the references therein). The difficulty with point-diffraction interferometers is that the pinhole diameter and the transmission factor of the semitransparent coating must be chosen carefully to achieve good interferograms.
Another alternative device is the so-called one-beam interferometer proposed by the authors some years ago [3], [4]. The one-beam interferometer resembles a two-arm interferometer in which the arms are together in one collimated beam.
The purpose of this paper is to present a robust optical architecture that employs a single element (a beam-splitter cube) to produce the interference of the two halves of a collimated beam. The beam-splitter cube generates simultaneously two interferograms with a relative phase-shift of π (rad). The advantages of the proposed interferometric architecture – with respect to standard ones – are its stability and the possibility to generate controllable straight interference fringes.
In the literature, to the best of our knowledge, there are not references to a similar optical architecture. The only relevant references we found are the reversed-wavefront Young interferometer to measure the two-point correlation function of a partially coherent light field recently proposed by Santarsiero and Borghi [5], and the shearing stellar interferometer proposed by Ribak and Lipson [6]. (There are also references to shearing interferometers using beam-splitters in the paper by Gustafsson and Karawacki [7].)
The proposed interferometer is described in the next section, and some experimental results are presented in Section 3.
Section snippets
Basic setup
The proposed interferometer is shown in Fig. 1. A light wave traveling along the z-axis is incident on a beam-splitter cube (BS) with its central semi-reflecting layer placed along the propagation direction. The top half of the light beam (Path 1) acts as the reference arm of the interferometer, and the bottom half (Path 2) is the test arm, or vice versa.
Fig. 2 shows the ray trajectories in the beam-splitter cube. The lens that images the input (object) plane Σin on the image plane Σout is not
Experimental results
In our setup we used a polarized He–Ne laser beam (λ = 633 nm), which was filtered and expanded to a diameter of ∼20 mm with the help of standard optics. The beam-splitter was a casually available polarizing beam-splitter cube (15 mm lateral size). The best interference contrast was obtained with vertical polarization, i.e., orthogonal to the plane of Fig. 1. (We also made experiments with other – polarizing and non-polarizing – beam-splitter cubes. In each case, the interference contrast depends on
Discussion and conclusions
In this paper we have presented a novel interferometer that employs a single element – a beam-splitter cube – to produce the interference of the two halves of a collimated beam. The interferometer is robust and easy to adjust because it has only one degree of freedom – the angle of rotation around an axis orthogonal to the plane of Fig. 1.
When the coherence length of the light source is large (e.g., a laser), the relative misalignment of the prisms that form the beam-splitter cube [8], i.e.,
References (11)
- et al.
Opt. Commun.
(2007) - et al.
- et al.
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A
(2006) - et al.
Opt. Lett.
(1999) - et al.
Appl. Opt.
(2002)
Cited by (53)
Light origami multi-beam interference digital holographic microscope for live cell imaging
2024, Optics and Laser TechnologyPhase retrieval by amplifying the prism term of the Transport of Intensity Equation with a sliding step function
2022, OptikCitation Excerpt :Conventional interferometric phase imaging methods are accurate, however they require both stable optical systems and coherent lighting to accomplish their goal [5,6]. Even though there exist highly stable interferometers where the reference and sample arms lie along the same light beam [7,8], the requirement of multiple images to implement any phase recovery algorithm is unavoidable. In recent years, new non-interferometric phase imaging techniques have been developed, providing highly satisfactory results competing with traditional interferometric methods [9,10].
LED source interferometer for microscopic fringe projection profilometry using a Gates’ interferometer configuration
2022, Optics and Lasers in EngineeringCitation Excerpt :The use of a beamsplitter cube with the Gates’ interferometric configuration had been extensively employed in recent research. Ferrari [26] implemented a single element in a robust interferometer. Similarly, Ghosh and Bhattacharya [27] presented phase-shifting interferometry using the same idea.
Generation of sub-microsecond quasi-unipolar pressure pulses
2019, UltrasonicsSoftware-defined optoacoustic tomography
2023, arXivRay tracing model of digital holography with single element interference
2023, Qiangjiguang Yu Lizishu/High Power Laser and Particle Beams