A review on dissimilar laser welding of steel-copper, steel-aluminum, aluminum-copper, and steel-nickel for electric vehicle battery manufacturing

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107595Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Review of the main challenges and scientific contributions.

  • The relationship between the process parameters and joint properties are explored.

  • The effect of intermetallic compounds on the joint properties is assessed.

  • The applicability of interlayers and coatings are discussed.

  • Opportunities for further research in this field are highlighted.

Abstract

The electric vehicle (EV) battery systems are complex assemblies of dissimilar materials in which battery cells are connected using several thousand interconnect joints. Every single joint influences the functionality and efficiency of the whole battery system, making the joining process crucial. Laser welding is considered a desirable choice for EV battery manufacturing due to its non-contact nature, high energy density, precise control over the heat input, and ease of automation. However, incompatible thermos-physical properties of dissimilar materials used in battery tabs and interconnectors pose a significant challenge for achieving complete metallurgical bond. Furthermore, the formation of undesirable weld microstructures such as hard and brittle intermetallic compounds (IMCs) substantially undermines the structural, electrical, and thermal characteristics of battery joints. This paper reviews the fundamental difficulties and latest developments in dissimilar laser welding of steel-copper, steel-aluminum, aluminum-copper, and steel-nickel, some of the potential joint combinations in EV battery pack manufacturing. The weld microstructure and common metallurgical defects, as well as mechanical and electrical properties of joints are discussed. In addition, the effects of laser welding process parameters on the joint properties and the applicability of various interlayers and coatings in laser welding of battery materials are assessed.

Introduction

The transport sector accounts for 24% of global CO2 emissions due to the combustion of fossil fuels [1]. It has been reported that internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles are responsible for almost three-quarters of this amount [2]. Under this threatening situation, carbon emission legislations have been set out across the globe to mitigate the harmful effects of climate change [3], [4]. Such policies have prompted nations to modernize the automotive sector and develop electric vehicles (EVs) to decrease their carbon footprint [5]. The UK, for example, plans to ban the sale of new petrol and diesel cars from 2030 and bring all greenhouse gas emissions to net-zero by 2050 [6]. Similar targets have been set by other major industrialized countries such as China and the EU [7], [8].

Although EVs offer a promising alternative to conventional vehicles, they only accounted for 2.6% of global car sales and about 1% of the entire global car stock in 2019 [9], [10]. The fundamental barrier to the large-scale adoption of EVs is the limited driving range which combined with insufficient charging infrastructure can lead to “range anxiety” in EV drivers [11], [12], [13]; the fear of stranding with an empty battery [14]. Currently, most EVs can only go around 100–250 km on a single charge, much shorter than their ICE counterparts [15]. Using larger batteries is not a feasible solution owing to limited space in EVs, additional cost, higher weight, and the requirement of more rare-earth elements [16], [17]. Hence, there is a need to enhance the energy density of the existing battery system as the key component that determines the vehicle’s performance [18], [19].

Currently, lithium-ion solid-state batteries are the most commonly used source of power for many low to high-capacity applications, including portable electronics and EVs [20]. While in mobile devices such as cell phones and laptops only a handful of cells are required, up to several thousand cells are inter-connected in EV battery systems to deliver the necessary power. Thus, the cell-to-cell or module level joining is the most critical joining process in battery pack manufacturing which directly influences the battery capacity [21]. The overview of the EV battery pack consisting of cell, module, and pack structure is illustrated in Fig. 1.

EV batteries currently use three cell formats: cylindrical, prismatic, and pouch cells [[20], [22]]. Fig. 2 shows these three cell formats [20]. Welding occures in all of them. For example, in the pouch format, the cell tabs are usually made of aluminum or copper and are generally connected in parallel or series configurations using steel, aluminum, copper or nickel busbars [21]. Weld joints in EV battery pack involve low-thickness materials (typically 0.3 mm to 1 mm) and the welding process is normally performed in lap, fillet, or spot configuration [23], [24]. A typical joint between Al tab to Cu busbar in pouch cells is presented in Fig. 3 [25]. The differences in thermos-physical properties of dissimilar materials such as melting temperature and thermal conductivity make it difficult to obtain a complete metallurgical bond without considerable cracks and porosities [26]. Furthermore, the formation of hard and brittle intermetallic compounds (IMCs) at the weld interface greatly reduces the battery's electrical capacity and structural performance. A weak joint cannot withstand the harsh driving environments, dynamic loading, vibrations, and possible crash and might even result in fire due to short-circuiting [27], [28]. The presence of IMCs also intensifies the heat generated during charging and discharging cycles due to their low electrical conductivity thereby accelerating the degradation process of the battery. The possibility of corrosion due to the presence of IMCs which further deteriorates the joint performance should be considered as well [29]. Atmospheric, localized, crevice, pitting, and galvanic are the most known types of corrosion that can happen here [30]. Corrosion not only degrades the mechanical performance of joints but it can also increase the connection electrical resistance [31]. In summary, a proper joint in the EV battery system must satisfy the following requirements:

  • Low electrical resistance

  • Good strength

  • High fatigue resistance

  • Low corrosion risk [32], [33].

Wire bonding (WB), resistance spot welding (RSW), ultrasonic welding (UW), and laser welding (LW) are the most investigated joining techniques for EV battery manufacturing [21]. Each of these methods has its advantages and limitations and is used based on cell type, properties, and thickness of the materials involved [20]. Other joining processes such as soldering, friction stir welding, micro-TIG or pulsed arc welding, joining by forming, and adhesive bonding have also been proposed [34], [35], [36], [37], [38]. However, due to the lack of information at present, further research is needed to thoroughly assess their feasibility [21].

In ultrasonic welding, a high-frequency (typically 20 kHz or above) ultrasonic vibration is applied under pressure to join substrates [20]. Oxides and contamination on the surfaces are removed during the welding and the result is a metallurgical bond created without melting, based on diffusion and adhesion of the softened metals [39], [40]. UW can produce good welds (without porosity, hot-cracks, and bulk intermetallics) between highly conductive dissimilar metals, and has been considered particularly superior for pouch cells. However, it can damage the structural integrity of cylindrical and prismatic cells due to the high frequency of vibration. It is also restricted to lap joints [20]. Wire bonding can be defined as single-sided ultrasonic welding of a small diameter Ag, Cu, or Al wire (typically below 0.5 mm), first to one substrate and then to the second or more substrates sequentially [22]. It is a technique frequently used in semiconductor device technology [21], and regardless of no scientific literature on its application in EV battery manufacturing, wire bonding has been employed in Tesla Model-S to connect battery cells and busbars [20]. Resistance spot welding is another method that can be used for EV battery welding. When a high current passes through the interface, it creates localized heating and melting, resulting in fusion welding of substrates [41]. However, resistance spot welding of highly conductive materials like aluminum and copper remains challenging and currently, this process is only suitable for low-conductivity materials [20], [42]. Laser welding is a highly efficient fusion welding technique with the advantages of creating a narrow heat-affected zone and a small targeted deformation [43]. Compared to other main welding techniques for EV battery pack manufacturing (i.e., RSW and UW), the lowest electrical contact resistances and highest joint strengths have been reported with laser welding [44]. Laser welding has the potential to be used for all three types of lithium-ion cells [20]. However, A poor metallurgical affinity between dissimilar materials normally limits the laser welding process and leads to potential defects such as the formation of detrimental intermetallic phases and crack sensitivity. Studies so far have reported that the joint performance could be improved by optimizing the welding process parameters [45]. Furthermore, the applicability of different interlayers and coatings to improve joint properties has been the subject of some recent investigations [46]. There have also been advances in novel lasers (i.e., blue and green lasers) which allow higher energy absorption on highly reflective surfaces of metals such as Cu and Al [47], [48].

This paper presents a comprehensive review on the dissimilar laser welding of the most common joint combinations in EV battery system including steel-copper, steel-aluminum, aluminum-copper, and steel-nickel. The fundamental metallurgical and structural challenges are discussed and the latest developments in process optimization have been highlighted to provide a basis for further studies on this topic.

Section snippets

Steel-copper

The welding of steel to copper is quite common when connecting cells in EV battery systems especially in cylindrical format. Table 1 presents the room temperature properties of Al, Cu, Fe, and Ni. While the data is for pure metals, they are still useful in understanding the differences in thermos-physical properties of their respective alloys. The differences in melting temperatures and thermal conductivities make obtaining a complete metallurgical bond very challenging in these systems [49].

Steel-aluminum

The fundamental challenge during laser welding of Al and steel is the formation of brittle intermetallics that usually include FeAl2, Fe2Al5, and FeAl3 [70]. Fig. 18 illustrates the equilibrium phase diagram of Fe-Al. The presence of these intermetallics reduces ductility and affects fatigue properties. Table 3 presents the hardness of intermetallic components of the Fe-Al system. It can be seen that Fe-rich intermetallics have much lower hardness compared to Al-rich intermetallics. The

Aluminum-copper

The aluminum and copper welds are of particular interest due to their low weight, cost efficiency, and electrical conductivity similar to that of copper alloys [97]. These joints are commonly used in EV battery pack [10]. The phase diagram of Al-Cu is shown in Fig. 28 [99]. Similar to laser welding of aluminum/steel, brittle intermetallic compounds are formed at the weld interface during aluminum to copper welding, causing crack sensitivity and poor mechanical properties. It has been reported

Steel-nickel

Steel-nickel dissimilar joint is another potential combination in EV battery pack especially between tab and case of cylindrical cells. Hu et al. [110] developed a three-dimensional transient numerical model for heat and mass transfer to calculate weld geometry and elemental distribution in laser spot welding of 304 stainless steel and nickel. They observed that elements were uniformly distributed in the weld pool which agreed well with calculated results. Porosity formation in laser welding of

Summary and outlook

Laser welding is a robust and contact-free welding process with high control of energy deposition which provides a crucial way for joining temperature-sensitive and dissimilar material components such as battery cells in the EV battery system. Laser welding of dissimilar materials has continued to develop over the past two decades. However, despite several studies on different laser sources, optimization of process parameters, and various interlayers, metallurgical defects such as incomplete

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (112)

  • M.F.R. Zwicker et al.

    Automotive battery pack manufacturing–a review of battery to tab joining

    Journal of Advanced Joining Processes

    (2020)
  • P. Taheri et al.

    Investigating electrical contact resistance losses in lithium-ion battery assemblies for hybrid and electric vehicles

    J. Power Sources

    (2011)
  • T. Solchenbach et al.

    Electrical performance of laser braze-welded aluminum–copper interconnects

    J. Manuf. Processes

    (2014)
  • V. Dimatteo et al.

    Continuous laser welding with spatial beam oscillation of dissimilar thin sheet materials (Al-Cu and Cu-Al): Process optimization and characterization

    J. Manuf. Processes

    (2019)
  • M. Fleckenstein et al.

    Current density and state of charge inhomogeneities in Li-ion battery cells with LiFePO4 as cathode material due to temperature gradients

    J. Power Sources

    (2011)
  • M.J. Brand et al.

    Electrical resistances of soldered battery cell connections

    J. Storage Mater.

    (2017)
  • A. Das et al.

    Weldability and shear strength feasibility study for automotive electric vehicle battery tab interconnects

    J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng.

    (2019)
  • J.P.M. Pragana et al.

    Manufacturing hybrid busbars through joining by forming

    J. Mater. Process. Technol.

    (2020)
  • S. Dhara et al.

    Impact of ultrasonic welding on multi-layered Al–Cu joint for electric vehicle battery applications: A layer-wise microstructural analysis

    Mater. Sci. Eng., A

    (2020)
  • X. Wu et al.

    Microstructure, welding mechanism, and failure of Al/Cu ultrasonic welds

    J. Manuf. Processes

    (2015)
  • X. Chen et al.

    Effect of Cu content on microstructure transformation and mechanical properties of Fe-Al dissimilar laser welded joints

    Opt. Laser Technol.

    (2020)
  • M.J. Brand et al.

    Welding techniques for battery cells and resulting electrical contact resistances

    J. Storage Mater.

    (2015)
  • T.A. Mai et al.

    Characterisation of dissimilar joints in laser welding of steel–kovar, copper–steel and copper–aluminium

    Mater. Sci. Eng., A

    (2004)
  • A. Das et al.

    Blue laser welding of multi-layered AISI 316L stainless steel micro-foils

    Opt. Laser Technol.

    (2020)
  • M. Haubold et al.

    Laser welding of copper using a high power disc laser at green wavelength

    Procedia CIRP

    (2018)
  • R.P. Shi et al.

    Formation mechanisms of self-organized core/shell and core/shell/corona microstructures in liquid droplets of immiscible alloys

    Acta Mater.

    (2013)
  • M. Velu et al.

    Metallurgical and mechanical examinations of steel–copper joints arc welded using bronze and nickel-base superalloy filler materials

    Mater. Des.

    (2013)
  • C. Yao et al.

    Interface microstructure and mechanical properties of laser welding copper–steel dissimilar joint

    Opt. Lasers Eng.

    (2009)
  • S. Chen et al.

    Influence of processing parameters on the characteristics of stainless steel/copper laser welding

    J. Mater. Process. Technol.

    (2015)
  • J. Li et al.

    Porosity and liquation cracking of dissimilar Nd: YAG laser welding of SUS304 stainless steel to T2 copper

    Opt. Laser Technol.

    (2020)
  • S.V. Kuryntsev et al.

    Fiber laser welding of austenitic steel and commercially pure copper butt joint

    Opt. Lasers Eng.

    (2017)
  • B.R. Moharana et al.

    An experimental study on joining of AISI 304 SS to Cu by Nd-YAG laser welding process

    Mater. Today:. Proc.

    (2020)
  • B.R. Moharana et al.

    Experimental investigation on mechanical and microstructural properties of AISI 304 to Cu joints by CO2 laser

    Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal

    (2016)
  • Q. Nguyen et al.

    Experimental investigation of temperature field and fusion zone microstructure in dissimilar pulsed laser welding of austenitic stainless steel and copper

    J. Manuf. Processes

    (2020)
  • S. RAMACHANDRAN et al.

    An insight into microstructural heterogeneities formation between weld subregions of laser welded copper to stainless steel joints

    Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China

    (2020)
  • M. Weigl et al.

    Influence of the feed rate and the lateral beam displacement on the joining quality of laser-welded copper-stainless steel connections

    Physics Procedia

    (2010)
  • M.J. Torkamany et al.

    Dissimilar welding of carbon steel to 5754 aluminum alloy by Nd: YAG pulsed laser

    Mater. Des.

    (2010)
  • L. Tricarico et al.

    Effects of heat treatments on mechanical properties of Fe/Al explosion-welded structural transition joints

    Mater. Des.

    (2009)
  • A. Mathieu et al.

    Dissimilar material joining using laser (aluminum to steel using zinc-based filler wire)

    Opt. Laser Technol.

    (2007)
  • R. Indhu et al.

    Microstructure development in pulsed laser welding of dual phase steel to aluminium alloy

    Procedia Manuf.

    (2018)
  • Q. Guan et al.

    Effect of steel to aluminum laser welding parameters on mechanical properties of weld beads

    Opt. Laser Technol.

    (2019)
  • J. Ma et al.

    Dissimilar joining of galvanized high-strength steel to aluminum alloy in a zero-gap lap joint configuration by two-pass laser welding

    Mater. Des.

    (2014)
  • R. Borrisutthekul et al.

    Suppression of intermetallic reaction layer formation by controlling heat flow in dissimilar joining of steel and aluminum alloy

    Mater. Sci. Eng., A

    (2007)
  • S. Yan et al.

    CW/PW dual-beam YAG laser welding of steel/aluminum alloy sheets

    Opt. Lasers Eng.

    (2010)
  • F. Yan et al.

    Improvement of microstructure and performance for steel/Al welds produced by magnetic field assisted laser welding

    Opt. Laser Technol.

    (2019)
  • J. Wloka et al.

    Corrosion properties of laser beam joints of aluminium with zinc-coated steel

    Corros. Sci.

    (2007)
  • L. Jia et al.

    Effects of zinc on the laser welding of an aluminum alloy and galvanized steel

    J. Mater. Process. Technol.

    (2015)
  • S. Chen et al.

    Influence of a Ni-foil interlayer on Fe/Al dissimilar joint by laser penetration welding

    Mater. Lett.

    (2012)
  • J. Sun et al.

    Investigation of laser welding on butt joints of Al/steel dissimilar materials

    Mater. Des.

    (2015)
  • M.J. Zhang et al.

    Research on microstructure and mechanical properties of laser keyhole welding–brazing of automotive galvanized steel to aluminum alloy

    Mater. Des.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (116)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text