Elsevier

Polymer Testing

Volume 31, Issue 3, May 2012, Pages 481-489
Polymer Testing

Test method
Translaminar fracture toughness testing of composites: A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.01.002Get rights and content

Abstract

A comprehensive review of techniques for the experimental characterisation of the fracture toughness associated with the translaminar (fibre-breaking) failure modes of continuously reinforced laminated composites is presented. The collection of work relating to tensile failure reveals a varied approach in terms of specimen configuration, size and data reduction, despite the existence of an ASTM standard. Best practices are identified and suggestions for extending the scope of the current standard are made. Works on compressive failure are found to be less comprehensive. Measurement of the toughness associated with initiation of the failure mode in isolation has been achieved, but this review finds that significant research steps need to be taken before a resistance curve can be fully characterised.

Introduction

The desire for efficient design, coupled with an ever-increasing understanding of composite failure, is moving industry towards a more damage tolerant approach to design with composites. Methods for predicting the onset and subsequent propagation of damage in composite components are, therefore, highly desirable.

There are several approaches to model damage propagation, such as using cohesive elements [1], smeared crack models [2] or X-FEM [3]. Each of these requires the fracture toughness for the failure mode they are simulating. Development of experimental techniques for accurate characterisation of the toughness is, therefore, critical.

The failure modes exhibited by laminated composites can be divided into delamination, intralaminar fracture and translaminar fracture. Delamination has been under extensive investigation for several years. Round-robin exercises [4], [5], [6], [7] have paved the way to the standardised procedures for measurement of mode I [8], [9], [10], mode II [10] and mixed mode I/II [11] fracture toughness. The state of the art of interlaminar fracture toughness testing methods has been comprehensively reviewed by several authors over the past years (e.g. [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]).

A significant number of published studies have been dedicated to translaminar fracture toughness measurement; however, these are often isolated pieces of work with some dating back to the late 70’s. Whilst the importance of translaminar fracture toughness measurement was recognised many years ago, it has received relatively little attention from the scientific community until now. This is at least partially due to (i) a lack of confidence in composites resulting in them not being used in primary structures where this type of characterisation is useful, and (ii) the lack of modelling capabilities which can use the parameters effectively.

This has now changed: large composite primary structures can be found on the latest aircraft, for example, and finite element analysis (FEA) is a common tool used for design. It is envisaged that the fracture toughnesses associated with the translaminar failure modes will play an increasingly important role over the coming years; therefore a review of the current literature is now opportune. This review draws together the conclusions of these studies, and presents a discussion to serve as a platform from which further work in the field can move forward. Work concerning characterisation of multidirectional laminates, as well as the individual translaminar ply failure modes, is presented in sections specific to specimen configuration. Methods of data reduction are noted and important experimental observations are highlighted.

Section snippets

Overview of composite failure modes

For a given loading condition, formation and propagation of damage within a laminate (and therefore its fracture toughness) will be lay-up dependent. Ultimately, failure will be governed by any one, or a combination of the ply-level failure mechanisms illustrated in Fig. 1. The failure modes which can arise through direct in-plane loading are:

Characterisation of multidirectional laminates

The majority of work in the field of translaminar fracture characterisation has been in measuring the toughness of multidirectional laminates manufactured from unidirectional or 2D woven material systems. In these cases, the measured toughness is dependent on lay-up and will be the result of the constituent plies failing in a combination of any of the aforementioned failure modes. Of the specimen configurations found in the literature, shown in Fig. 3, only the compact tension, three/four point

Characterisation of translaminar ply failure modes

The work reviewed thus far has been concerned with measurement of fracture toughness of laminates. The resulting critical strain energy release rates, or stress intensity factors, are essentially a homogenisation of the damage mechanisms being exhibited in each constituent ply. These lay-up dependent properties are of limited use as they are not representative of any property intrinsic to the material system.

Vaiyda and Sun [53] first demonstrated the concept of an in situ 0° ply fracture

Tension

A range of specimen configurations have been used for translaminar tensile testing, however, as already mentioned, only the CT, ECT, 3PB and 4PB exhibit stable crack growth which is necessary for R-curve characterisation. Of these, only the ECT has yet to exhibit any experimental problems; it was introduced as a result of crack propagation perpendicular to the desired growth direction in CT specimens, and loading point damage in 3PB specimens [24]. It is evident from the literature, however,

Conclusions

The work presented here illustrates the diversity of approaches which have been used to characterise translaminar fracture. A wide range of specimen configurations, sizes and data reduction strategies have been used. This diversity has arisen from the innovations of many researchers, all of whom are motivated by the difficulty in triggering the desired failure mode and obtaining accurate results. Having reviewed the work available in the literature, a platform for future testing has been built

Acknowledgements

The funding of this research from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and Rolls-Royce plc under a CASE award [CASE/CNA/06/41] is gratefully acknowledged.

References (59)

  • S.T. Pinho et al.

    Developing a four point bend specimen to measure the mode I intralaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional laminated composites

    Composites Science and Technology

    (2009)
  • S.T. Pinho et al.

    Fracture toughness of the tensile and compressive fibre failure modes in laminated composites

    Composites Science and Technology

    (2006)
  • M.J. Laffan et al.

    Measurement of the in situ ply fracture toughness associated with mode I fibre tensile failure in FRP. Part I: data reduction

    Composites Science and Technology

    (2010)
  • M.J. Laffan et al.

    Measurement of the in situ ply fracture toughness associated with mode I fibre tensile failure in FRP. Part II: size and lay-up effects

    Composites Science and Technology

    (2010)
  • M.J. Laffan et al.

    Translaminar fracture toughness: the critical notch tip radius of 0° plies in CFRP

    Composites Science and Technology

    (2011)
  • G. Catalanotti et al.

    Measurement of resistance curves in the longitudinal failure of composites using digital image correlation

    Composites Science and Technology

    (2010)
  • K.G. Dassios et al.

    Intrinsic parameters in the fracture of carbon/carbon composites

    Composites Science and Technology

    (2005)
  • R. Reber et al.

    Intralaminar fracture of weft-knitted carbon Fiber reinforced peek

    Fracture of Polymers, Composites and Adhesives

    (2000)
  • S. Jose et al.

    Intralaminar fracture toughness of a cross-ply laminate and its constituent sub-laminates

    Composites Science and Technology

    (2001)
  • I. Kongshavn et al.

    Experimental investigation of a strain-softening approach to predicting failure in notched fibre-reinforced composite laminates

    Composites Science and Technology

    (1999)
  • R. El-Hajjar et al.

    Mode-I fracture toughness testing of thick section FRP composites using the ESE(T) specimen

    Engineering Fracture Mechanics

    (2005)
  • D.C. Leach et al.

    Toughness of aromatic polymer composites reinforced with carbon fibres

    Fibre Science and Technology

    (1985)
  • M.P.F. Sutcliffe et al.

    Microbuckle propagation in carbon fibre-epoxy composites

    Acta Metallurgica et Materialia

    (1994)
  • T.K. O’Brien et al.

    Round robin testing for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of composite materials

    Journal of Composites Technology and Research

    (1993)
  • P. Davies

    Round Robin analysis of GIc interlaminar fracture test

    Applied Composite Materials

    (1996)
  • ASTM, D5528

    Standard Test Method for Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber-reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites

    (2007)
  • ISO, ISO 15024:2001

    Determination of Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness, GIC, for Unidirectionally Reinforced Materials

    (2001)
  • JIS, K 7086-1993

    Testing Methods for Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastics

    (1993)
  • ASTM, D 6671/D 6671M-06

    Mixed Mode I-Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites

    (2006)
  • Cited by (173)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text