Techno-economic review of rooftop photovoltaic systems: Case studies of industrial, residential and off-grid rooftops in Bangalore, Karnataka
Introduction
Although India has witnessed most of its growth in solar power in the utility scale power plant sector [1], most states are now focusing on policies which promote Rooftop Photovoltaic (RTPV) systems. RTPV systems have the following advantages in terms of distributed and decentralized electricity generation and consumption:
- •
No ground level land required
- •
Reduced gestation period
- •
Reduced transmission and distribution (T&D) losses because of the decentralized nature of power generation and usage
- •
Environmental benefits from displacing small-scale diesel generator (DG) sets
- •
Reduction in system congestion due to higher self-consumption
- •
Capacity building of local electricians
This article reviews the techno-economics involved in setting up a RTPV system in Bengaluru, Karnataka, taking the existing policy framework into account. Households, industries and commercial establishments with roofs made of concrete, machine-made tiles and corrugated galvanized iron/metal/asbestos sheets have been taken into consideration for this study. According to the recent census data [2], the total number of such households in urban Bengaluru is 1,999,994. Taking a conservative approach, it is assumed that an average urban household in Bengaluru (with a demand of 2.4 kW in 2012-13) has a demand for 3.5 kW in 2021-22 which rises to 4 kW in 2031-32 (this assumption is based on the historical trends of per capita consumption statistics provided by BESCOM and it also takes into account the inclusion of domestic air-conditioning loads in households with a rated load of more than 2.5 kW today [3], [4]. If 5% of such households set up RTPV systems with the designated rated load by 2021-22, the total installed capacity would be around 350 MW and if 8% set up RTPV systems by 2031-32, the total installed capacity would increase to 560 MW. Today, BESCOM reports a shortage of around 200 MW in the city with respect to the peak demand. The projected installed RTPV capacity in 2021-22 and 2031-32 will effectively contribute in reducing this shortage (which is likely to increase) by a great extent. Owing to lack of data regarding industrial and commercial rooftops in Bengaluru, projections of capacity of RTPV have not been made.
The Karnataka Renewable Energy Development Limited (KREDL) and the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC) are aware of this tremendous potential and have recently come up with draft policy measures to encourage consumers to adopt RTPV systems. At a central level, the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) offers a capital subsidy of 30% on the initial investment required to set up a RTPV system. However, there are barriers in receiving this subsidy and recent reports suggest that it will be a while before capital subsidies for RTPV systems are disbursed through reliable channels in the country [5]. The next section of this article presents an overview of policies pertinent to RTPV systems in Karnataka.
Section snippets
RTPV policy regime in Karnataka
According to the Renewable Energy Policy of Karnataka [6], 250 MW of RTPV systems have been targeted to be set up by 2014. The recently released draft solar policy [7] targets a total of 2000 MW of solar PV installations (including RTPV and off-grid systems) by 2020. To reach these targets KREDL and KERC formulated certain policy incentives for prospective proponents of RTPV systems. These are described briefly in the following sub-sections.
Methodology
The objective of this research is to assess the techno-economic feasibility of installing RTPV systems in an urban context taking Bangalore to be a case study. Since RTPV is a decentralized distributed power generation system, specific case studies have been undertaken in the industrial, commercial and residential spaces to represent the entirety of the city. For the sake of confidentiality the names of the sites are not revealed. Five units have been identified for analysis in the Peenya
Calculations
This section will enable the reader to grasp the results of the research which are presented in the next section. The approach taken to arrive at the calculated techno-economics using the methodology mentioned above is described here. The specific case studies that have been considered for this analysis are:
- 1.
An urban villa with a rated load of 7 kW and a RTPV system of 5 kWp capacity with and without storage; revenue model of net metering
- 2.
A sub-urban villa (weekend or holiday home) with a rated
Results and discussion
Each of the case studies has been analyzed in terms of financial feasibility for the consumer as well as the financial implications for the utility or the state/central government institution which enables the consumer to invest in RTPV systems. The significant results pertinent to each case study are highlighted in Table 6. The Net Cumulative Cash Flow of each system throughout its lifetime is shown in Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4.
Some important inferences can be made from the findings in Table 6:
- •
A
Conclusions
This article explores the profitability of various kinds of RTPV systems in Bangalore taking the different policy incentives existing today into account. Compared to other countries both the net metering and FiT schemes fare well in terms of financial performance in semi-urban spaces in the city. The reason why semi-urban domestic households have better financial performance with RTPV systems when compared to urban households is because the consumption from the grid is lesser along with higher
Acknowledgments
This article is based upon work supported in part under the US-India partnership to Advance Clean Energy Research (PACE-R) for the Solar Energy Research Institute for India and the United States (SERIIUS), funded jointly by the U.S Department of Energy (Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, and Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Solar Energy Technology Program, under subcontract DE-AC36-08GO283O8 to the National Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado) and the Government of India
References (44)
- et al.
End-uses of electricity in households of Karnataka state, India
Energ Sustain Dev
(2001) - et al.
An assessment of Thailand׳s feed-in tariff program
Renew Energ
(2013) - et al.
Compulsive policy-making—the evolution of the German feed-intariff system for solar photovoltaic power
Res Policy
(2014) - et al.
Economic analysis of investment in the rooftop photovoltaic systems: a long-term research in the two main markets
Renew Sustain Energ Rev
(2013) - et al.
The doping effect of Italian feed-in tariffs on the PV market
Energ Policy
(2014) Using a system dynamics model to assess the effects of capital subsidies and feed-in tariffs on solar PV installations
Appl Energ
(2012)Revised feed-in tariff for solar photovoltaic in the United Kingdom: a cloudy future ahead?
Energ Policy
(2013)- et al.
The erratic path of the low-carbon transition in China: evolution of solar PV policy
Energ Policy
(2014) - et al.
Feed-in tariffs and other support mechanisms for solar PV promotion.
Compr Renew Energ
(2012) Energy policy to promote photovoltaic generation
Renew Sustain Energ Rev
(2013)
Pricing electricity from residential photovoltaic systems: a comparison of feed-in tariffs, net metering, and net purchase and sale
Sol Energ
Photovoltaic modules and their applications: a review on thermal modelling
Appl Energ
Progress in solar PV technology: research and achievement
Renew Sustain Energ Rev
A comparative assessment of net metering and feed in tariff schemes for residential PV systems
Sustain Energ Technol Assessments
Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission Phase II – Policy Document
Avoiding 100 new power plants by increasing efficiency of room air conditioners in India: opportunities and challenges
Renewable Energy Policy of Karnataka
Draft solar policy.
Bangalore.
The impact of rate design and net metering on the bill savings from distributed PV for residential customers in California
Energ Policy
Thai power: net metering comes to Thailand
Refocus
Cited by (37)
An evaluation of the economic benefits of rooftop distributed photovoltaic projects in the whole county in China
2023, Journal of Cleaner ProductionModelling of an off-grid roof-top residential photovoltaic nano grid system for an urban locality in India
2023, Energy for Sustainable DevelopmentResearch landscape and hot topics of rooftop PV: A bibliometric and network analysis
2021, Energy and BuildingsDesign and economic analysis of off-grid solar PV system in Jos-Nigeria
2021, Journal of Cleaner ProductionThe economics of solar PV self-consumption in Thailand
2019, Renewable EnergyEconomic analysis of residential solar photovoltaic electricity production in Canada
2019, Sustainable Energy Technologies and AssessmentsCitation Excerpt :Large size PV plants were found to give best profit margins in Italy whereas medium size PV plants were more beneficial in Germany. Techno-economic studies were also performed in Karnataka (India) by Saptak-Gosh et al. [15]. Their conclusion was that due to the cap of 75% on the capacity of any installed roof-top PV system (RTPV), the net metering scheme will never gain momentum in Karnataka.
- 1
Senior Research Engineer.
- 2
Intern, Tel.: +91(80) 42490048; Mobile: +91 9445603493.
- 3
Principal Research Scientist,Tel.: +91(80) 42490028, Mobile: +91 9844080350.