Elsevier

Science of The Total Environment

Volume 595, 1 October 2017, Pages 567-583
Science of The Total Environment

Review
A review of reverse osmosis membrane fouling and control strategies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.235Get rights and content

Highlights

  • RO membranes are prone to fouling in different forms.

  • Current control strategies can mitigate fouling but cannot prevent fouling completely.

  • Novel membrane materials have great potential to control fouling effectively.

  • Statistical analysis revealed strong research interest in RO fouling and mitigation.

Abstract

Reverse osmosis (RO) membrane technology is one of the most important technologies for water treatment. However, membrane fouling is an inevitable issue. Membrane fouling leads to higher operating pressure, flux decline, frequent chemical cleaning and shorter membrane life. This paper reviews membrane fouling types and fouling control strategies, with a focus on the latest developments. The fundamentals of fouling are discussed in detail, including biofouling, organic fouling, inorganic scaling and colloidal fouling. Furthermore, fouling mitigation technologies are also discussed comprehensively. Pretreatment is widely used in practice to reduce the burden for the following RO operation while real time monitoring of RO has the advantage and potential of providing support for effective and efficient cleaning. Surface modification could slow down membrane fouling by changing surface properties such as surface smoothness and hydrophilicity, while novel membrane materials and synthesis processes build a promising future for the next generation of RO membranes with big advancements in fouling resistance. Especially in this review paper, statistical analysis is conducted where appropriate to reveal the research interests in RO fouling and control.

Introduction

Water shortage is one of major challenges in many places around the world (Adeniji-Oloukoi et al., 2013, Avrin et al., 2015, Garcia-cuerva et al., 2016, Hibbs et al., 2016). It is exacerbated by water pollution from agricultural residues, sewage as well as industrial waste (Yao et al., 2016). In order to meet the rising demand for fresh water, strategies like water reuse and seawater desalination have already been applied (Bartman et al., 2011, Gu et al., 2013). Membrane technology is one of the most promising ways to produce high quality water (Lin et al., 2016, Ochando-Pulido et al., 2016, Tang et al., 2016b).

The common membrane technologies for water treatment include but are not limited to microfiltration (MF) (He et al., 2016), ultrafiltration (UF) (Sun et al., 2015), nanofiltration (NF) (Ribera et al., 2014), reverse osmosis (RO) (Yang et al., 2017), forward osmosis (FO) (Boo et al., 2012), membrane distillation (MD) (Bush et al., 2016), electrodialysis (ED) (Zhang et al., 2015c) and pervaporation (PV) (Subramani and Jacangelo, 2015). RO membrane technology is widely used in seawater desalination, drinking water production, brackish water treatment and wastewater treatment. RO is currently the most energy-efficient technology for desalination, with energy cost about 1.8 kWh/m3, which is much lower than that of other technologies (Xu et al., 2013b). Also, RO membrane has the advantages of high water permeability and salt rejection, fulfillment of the most rigorous rules for public health, environmental protection and separation process (López-Ramírez et al., 2006).

However, RO membrane fouling is a main challenge to reliable membrane performance. Fouling is a complicated phenomenon which involves different mechanisms under different circumstances (Khan et al., 2014). For example, a lot of RO projects reusing wastewater with high levels of phosphate are in operation worldwide (Chesters, 2009). In these plants, calcium phosphate scaling on membrane surfaces is a big problem, resulting in poor plant operation and high cleaning and maintenance cost (Chesters, 2009). Membrane fouling could significantly reduce productivity and permeate quality while increasing operation cost due to increased energy demand, additional pretreatment, foulants removal and membrane cleaning, maintenance, as well as reduction in membrane lifetime (Al-Amoudi, 2010, Eric et al., 2001, Kochkodan et al., 2014, Tang et al., 2011). In order to control membrane fouling, a variety of methods such as pretreatment, membrane monitoring, membrane cleaning, surface modification, as well as developing novel RO membranes have been studied (Al-Juboori and Yusaf, 2012, Brehant et al., 2002, Henthorne and Boysen, 2015, Nguyen et al., 2012, Robinson et al., 2016). The application of different methods could result in different control effects and therefore, in practice these techniques are usually applied together to reduce RO membrane fouling.

Statistical analysis revealed that in the last 25 years, over 3000 papers were published to address the issue of RO membrane fouling (shown in Fig. 1, see Supplementary Information for more details on statistical analysis method), indicating researchers' great interest in this area. Specifically, the number of SCI papers published in 2016 increased by around 20 times compared to papers published in 1992 and was around twice as the papers published 5 years ago (i.e., year 2011). A polynomial model was derived to describe the cumulative number of publications from 1992 to 2016, with the equation P = 0.3735  Y3  6.881  Y2 + 67.139  Y  83.109 (R2 > 0.999), where P is the cumulative number of publications and Y denotes the number of years since 1992. Based on this model, and assuming that no revolutionary breakthroughs in RO membrane technology and alternative technologies as well will be made in the next ten years, then it can be predicted that by the year 2022, the cumulative number of papers published will possibly be about twice that of 2016. Although the research trend may not be predicted precisely simply by this model, it can at least give us an indication that research interest in this field will continue to bloom.

Therefore, it is necessary to provide an up-to-date review of RO fouling and its control. This paper reviews membrane fouling and fouling control strategies, with a focus on the latest advances. The first objective of this paper is to elucidate the types of fouling. The second objective is to discuss state of the art strategies for fouling mitigation, including pretreatment, monitoring, cleaning, surface modification as well as novel membrane materials and synthesis process. Especially, statistical analysis (bibliometric method) is adopted where appropriate in this review paper to reveal researchers' interest in related sub-fields. This comprehensive review may provide an avenue for future research work related to RO membrane fouling.

Section snippets

Membrane fouling

Generally fouling is the accumulation of undesired deposits on the membrane surface or inside the membrane pores, causing decrease of permeation flux and salt rejection (Malaeb and Ayoub, 2011). Since water is the operating environment for most RO applications, it is important to understand the behaviors of water as well as ion transport through RO membrane, which could indicate how RO fouling occurs. Water permeation through membrane could take place in the form of Brownian diffusion, flush

Membrane fouling control strategies

A lot of efforts have been done to address the problem of fouling. For example, through improving hydrodynamics of the filtration process, membrane fouling could be reduced. A detailed discussion on hydrodynamics can be found in another review paper (She et al., 2016) and is not the focus of this paper. Generally, the difficulty to mitigate fouling is different depending on fouling types. Inorganic scaling could be easily reduced through chemical and physical methods. In contrast, organic

Concluding remarks

RO membrane technology is one of the best technologies for wastewater treatment and desalination. Membrane fouling seems to be an inborn and inevitable problem of membrane technology. Depending on feed water qualities, operation conditions and membrane characteristics, one or several types of fouling could occur, such as biofouling, organic fouling, inorganic scaling and colloidal fouling. Although different types of foulants may have different forming processes, sometimes there are no distinct

References (226)

  • A. Antony et al.

    In situ structural and functional characterization of reverse osmosis membranes using electrical impedance spectroscopy

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2013)
  • E. Arkhangelsky et al.

    Effects of scaling and cleaning on the performance of forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2012)
  • T. Asami et al.

    Evaluation of virus removal efficiency of coagulation-sedimentation and rapid sand filtration processes in a drinking water treatment plant in Bangkok, Thailand

    Water Res.

    (2016)
  • A.P. Avrin et al.

    Assessing the impacts of nuclear desalination and geoengineering to address China's water shortages

    Desalination

    (2015)
  • S. Azari et al.

    Fouling resistant zwitterionic surface modification of reverse osmosis membranes using amino acid l-cysteine

    Desalination

    (2013)
  • H. Bae et al.

    Changes in the relative abundance of biofilm-forming bacteria by conventional sand-filtration and microfiltration as pretreatments for seawater reverse osmosis desalination

    Desalination

    (2011)
  • A.R. Bartman et al.

    Mineral scale monitoring for reverse osmosis desalination via real-time membrane surface image analysis

    Desalination

    (2011)
  • A. Belila et al.

    Bacterial community structure and variation in a full-scale seawater desalination plant for drinking water production

    Water Res.

    (2016)
  • A.J. Blok et al.

    Surface initiated polydopamine grafted poly([2-(methacryoyloxy)ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride) coatings to produce reverse osmosis desalination membranes with anti-biofouling properties

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2014)
  • V. Bonnélye et al.

    UF/MF as RO pre-treatment: the real benefit

    Desalination

    (2008)
  • C. Boo et al.

    Colloidal fouling in forward osmosis: role of reverse salt diffusion

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2012)
  • A. Brehant et al.

    Comparison of MF/UF pretreatment with conventional filtration prior to RO membranes for surface seawater desalination

    Desalination

    (2002)
  • J.A. Bush et al.

    Membrane distillation for concentration of hypersaline brines from the Great Salt Lake: effects of scaling and fouling on performance, efficiency, and salt rejection

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2016)
  • M. Bystrianský et al.

    The presence of ferric iron promotes calcium sulphate scaling in reverse osmosis processes

    Desalination

    (2016)
  • J. Cen et al.

    Real time fouling monitoring with electrical impedance spectroscopy

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2015)
  • Q. Cheng et al.

    Surface modification of a commercial thin-film composite polyamide reverse osmosis membrane through graft polymerization of N-isopropylacrylamide followed by acrylic acid

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2013)
  • S.P. Chesters

    Innovations in the inhibition and cleaning of reverse osmosis membrane scaling and fouling

    Desalination

    (2009)
  • T.C. Chilcott et al.

    In situ characterization of compaction, ionic barrier and hydrodynamics of polyamide reverse osmosis membranes using electrical impedance spectroscopy

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2015)
  • J. Cho et al.

    Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: initial comparison of rejection and flux decline characteristics with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes

    Water Res.

    (1999)
  • H. Choi et al.

    Surface modification of SWRO membranes using hydroxyl poly(oxyethylene) methacrylate and zwitterionic carboxylated polyethyleneimine

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2015)
  • K.D. Cobry et al.

    Comprehensive experimental studies of early-stage membrane scaling during nanofiltration

    Desalination

    (2011)
  • D. Cohen-Tanugi et al.

    Nanoporous graphene as a reverse osmosis membrane: recent insights from theory and simulation

    Desalination

    (2015)
  • S.A. Creber et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging and 3D simulation studies of biofilm accumulation and cleaning on reverse osmosis membranes

    Food Bioprod. Process.

    (2010)
  • S.A. Creber et al.

    Chemical cleaning of biofouling in reverse osmosis membranes evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2010)
  • L.F. Delgado et al.

    The removal of endocrine disrupting compounds, pharmaceutically activated compounds and cyanobacterial toxins during drinking water preparation using activated carbon-a review

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2012)
  • W. Den et al.

    Removal of silica from brackish water by electrocoagulation pretreatment to prevent fouling of reverse osmosis membranes

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2008)
  • A. Derylo-Marczewska et al.

    Adsorption of chlorophenoxy pesticides on activated carbon with gradually removed external particle layers

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2017)
  • S. Ding et al.

    The effects of organic fouling on the removal of radionuclides by reverse osmosis membranes

    Water Res.

    (2016)
  • A. Drews

    Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors-characterisation, contradictions, cause and cures

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2010)
  • L.F. Dumée et al.

    Towards integrated anti-microbial capabilities: novel bio-fouling resistant membranes by high velocity embedment of silver particles

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2015)
  • L.F. Dumée et al.

    Hybrid thin film nano-composite membrane reactors for simultaneous separation and degradation of pesticides

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2017)
  • R. Fabris et al.

    Comparison of NOM character in selected Australian and Norwegian drinking waters

    Water Res.

    (2008)
  • W. Falath et al.

    Novel reverse osmosis membranes composed of modified PVA/Gum Arabic conjugates: biofouling mitigation and chlorine resistance enhancement

    Carbohydr. Polym.

    (2017)
  • F. Ferrero et al.

    Chitosan coated cotton gauze for antibacterial water filtration

    Carbohydr. Polym.

    (2014)
  • E. Filloux et al.

    Biofouling and scaling control of reverse osmosis membrane using one-step cleaning-potential of acidified nitrite solution as an agent

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2015)
  • H.-C. Flemming

    Reverse osmosis membrane biofouling

    Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci.

    (1997)
  • F. Galiano et al.

    A step forward to a more efficient wastewater treatment by membrane surface modification via polymerizable bicontinuous microemulsion

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2015)
  • Q. Gan et al.

    Synergetic cleaning procedure for a ceramic membrane fouled by beer microfiltration

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1999)
  • W. Gao et al.

    Understanding water and ion transport behaviour and permeability through poly(amide) thin film composite membrane

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2015)
  • L. Garcia-cuerva et al.

    Public perceptions of water shortages, conservation behaviors, and support for water reuse in the U.S

    Resour. Conserv. Recycl.

    (2016)
  • Cited by (658)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text