Elsevier

Tribology International

Volume 71, March 2014, Pages 17-25
Tribology International

Force coefficients for a large clearance open ends squeeze film damper with a central feed groove: Experiments and predictions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2013.10.021Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Comprehensive measurements of dynamic pressures in groove and film lands of a squeeze film damper.

  • Identifies force coefficients from dynamic loads and bearing displacements for a large range of whirl frequencies.

  • Correlates identified SFD parameters against classical model predictions and points out to the formulas limited value.

  • Validates predictions from a flow model that incorporates flow interactions between a groove and film lands.

Abstract

The paper describes a large load squeeze film damper (SFD) test rig, details measurements of dynamic loads inducing circular orbits conducted on a large clearance (c=0.250 mm) open ends centrally grooved SFD, and presents the identified experimental SFD force coefficients for operation at three static eccentricities. The rig has a bearing cartridge supported atop four elastic rods and a stationary journal, 0.127 mm in diameter. The damper consists of two parallel film lands, 12.7 mm in length, separated by a central groove, 6.35 mm 9.5 mm in depth. In the journal, three equally spaced holes, 120° apart, supply a light lubricant into the central groove and squeeze film lands. The experimental SFD force coefficients are compared to test results obtained earlier for a damper with the same film land lengths but with a smaller clearance (c=0.140 mm) and against predictions obtained from an advanced physical model that accounts for the flow field in the central groove and the interaction with the adjacent film lands. Dynamic pressures in the film lands and in the central groove are (not) surprisingly of the same order of magnitude. The central groove affects the dynamic forced response of the test damper to generate large direct damping coefficients, ~3.5 times those derived from classical lubrication formulas. Experimental added mass coefficients are ~7.4 times the predictive classical values. Predictions from an advanced model correlate well with the test data when using a shallow groove depth. The measurements and analysis advance knowledge on the dynamic forced performance of SFDs, point out to the limited value of simplistic predictive formulas, and validate the accuracy of a modern predictive tool.

Introduction

Efficient multiple-stage turbomachinery implements tighter clearances in secondary flow passages, uses advanced materials; and implementing flexible rotors, demands of an increased tolerance to disk imbalances [1]. Operation at high shaft speeds induces severe dynamic loading with large amplitude journal motions at the bearing supports. In aircraft engines, squeeze film dampers (SFDs) are a proven mean to add viscous damping that aids to reduce rotor dynamic displacements and also serve to isolate the rotor(s) from the engine frame [2].

SFDs have been designed for industrial usage for well over half a century. Hence, the literature on SFDS is not scant. For example Refs. [1], [2] and the review papers [3], [4] detail the governing equations for generation of the hydrodynamic pressure field and fluid film reaction forces and the effect of SFDs on the rotordynamics of simple systems, rigid and flexible. These references also review relevant experimental data and establish there is modest agreement with predictions from classical lubrication theory, hence concluding the forced performance of SFDs is complicated, i.e., hard to predict, due to a number of effects (usually) not considered in the analysis and design processes. Some of these effects include fluid inertia—temporal and advective, in particular for configurations with circumferential oil supply grooves [5], [6], and the persistence of air ingestion and entrapment in dampers with open ends and not supplied copiously with enough flow to avoid the formation of bubbly mixtures [2]. More recently, Gehannin and Arghir [7] Delgado and San Andrés [8] extend the review of prior art to the present day, advance bulk-flow models to address realistically various issues of SFD performance, and provide extensive validations against measured squeeze film pressures and force coefficients.

In the author's opinion, disconnect between academic research and engineering practice persists due to the widespread belief that a squeeze film damper is just a plain journal bearing that does not spin. To date the vast amount of literature on the nonlinear dynamics of rotors supported on (short length journal) SFDs is suspicious due to the lack of supporting experimental evidence. That is, the implementation of SFDs in actual compressor and gas turbine applications shows them to be linear elements, as opposed to highly nonlinear elements that can induce jump phenomenon and multiple valued responses [2], [9], [10].

This paper presents measurements of true rotordynamic force coefficients1 for an open ends SFD comprised of two parallel film lands separated by a deep central groove. The radial clearance of the test element is c=0.250 mm. An aircraft main engine application dictates the damper dimensions, lubricant properties and operating conditions. The contents of this paper complement prior work reported in the theses of Seshagiri [11] and Mahecha [12], both works summed in the archival literature as Refs. [13], [14]. The earlier work was conducted with the same mechanical element but with a smaller film radial clearance, cs=0.140 mm. Details on the test rig, measurement procedure, and experimental results follow shortly.

As in a much earlier work [15], [16], the present experimental data shows the circumferential groove is not impervious to journal motions, hence generating significant dynamic film pressures that contribute greatly to the overall forced response of the test element. To this date it is customary to regard a deep and wide groove as an ideal source (or sink) of fluid flow, not affected by the journal kinetics, and hence decoupled to the dynamics of the adjacent squeeze film lands. The poor practice ignores a vast amount of experimental evidence, Refs. [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16] to name a few. Most importantly, as the reader will soon realize, predictions of the force coefficients for the test SFD using classical oversimplified formulas is futile. An advanced physical model offers a good correlation with the experimental force coefficients, albeit it uses an effective groove depth that remains as an empirical parameter.

Section snippets

Description of the SFD test rig

Fig. 1 shows the SFD test rig and its support structure, a hydraulic static loader and two electromagnetic shakers. The inset on the right labels the major components and their disposition. Fig. 2 depicts a schematic cross-section view of the SFD test section and the lubricant flow path. The SFD section is the gap between a stationary rigid journal and a bearing cartridge (BC) elastically supported. The journal with diameter D=127 mm is rigidly mounted to a base, which in turn is fastened to a

Identification of structural parameters for dry test system

Upon installation and centering of a journal or reconfiguration of the rods’ support system the process calls for the measurement of the support structure static stiffness (KS). To this end, static pull loads are imposed on the dry (unlubricated) structure displacing the BC radially to a maximum eccentricity eS ~0.35c. The estimated static structure stiffness KS ~17.5 MN/m from a linear curve-fit of the test data.

Still under dry (no lubricant) conditions and with a centered BC, single-frequency

Identification of force coefficients with lubricated test system

Lubricant ISO VG 2 is supplied at an inlet pressure of 12 kPa and temperature of 23 °C though the three feed orifices to fill the central groove and adjacent film lands. A test consists of statically displacing the journal to eccentricity (eS) using the hydraulic piston load system; and then, with the external shakers, exerting dynamic loads that produced circular orbits with amplitude r=12.5 μm. The static eccentricities are eS=0 μm, 25 μm, 50 μm and 75 μm (~0.3 c), 45° away from the X and Y axes. The

Comparison of force coefficients for two open ends SFDs, small and large clearances (c ~0140 mm and 0.251 mm)

Seshagiri [11] reports the SFD force coefficients for two open ends dampers with film land lengths equaling L=12.7 mm and 25.4 mm with film radial clearance cs=0.14 mm, i.e., ~56% of the current one, c=0.250 mm. For reference, Table 4 lists the distinct operation characteristics for the tests conducted with the two dampers, both with the same film land length (L) and differing film land clearances.

Fig. 3 shows the SFD direct damping and inertia force coefficients versus static eccentricity (eS) for

Dynamic film pressures recorded in the film lands and groove of test damper

Fig. 4 depicts the six piezoelectric pressure sensors installed in the bearing cartridge to measure lubricant pressures at mid-axial length of the squeeze film lands and in the central groove. In the top and bottom lands there are two pairs of sensors installed 120° apart. Two other sensors measure dynamic pressures in the central groove. The sensors are flush mounted to the inner diameter of the bearing cartridge and thus face directly a film land, a central groove, and an end groove.

This

Predictions of SFD force coefficients and comparisons to test data

Refs. [18], [19] advance a physical bulk-flow model for prediction of the pressure film in thin film land sections separated by grooves, as shown in Fig. 7. The model bridges the gap between extensive experimental data4

Conclusions

This paper describes the components and operation of a large load SFD test rig, details measurements of dynamic loads conducted on a large clearance (c=0.250 mm) open ends damper, and presents the experimental SFD force coefficients for operation at three static eccentric positions. The damper consists of two parallel film lands, 12.7 mm in length, separated by a deep central groove, 6.35 mm in width. Three equally spaced holes, 120° apart, supply an ISO VG 2 lubricant into the central groove at

Acknowledgments

The support of the Turbomachinery Research Consortium is gratefully acknowledged (technical report TRC-SFD-01-2012). Thanks to Ms. Paola Mahecha, graduate research assistant, for conducting the measurements.

References (21)

  • Zeidan, F, San Andrés, L, Vance, JM., 1996, Design and application of squeeze film dampers in rotating machinery. In:...
  • San Andrés, L., 2010, Squeeze film dampers: operation, models and technical issues, Modern Lubrication Theory, Notes...
  • L. Della Pietra et al.

    The squeeze film damper over four decades of investigations. Part I: Characteristics and operating features

    Shock Vib Dig

    (2002)
  • G. Adiletta et al.

    The squeeze film damper over four decades of investigations. Part II: Rotordynamic analyses with rigid and flexible rotors

    Shock Vib Dig

    (2002)
  • A Delgado et al.

    A model for improved prediction of force coefficients in grooved squeeze film dampers and oil seal rings

    ASME J Tribol

    (2010)
  • L. San Andrés et al.

    A novel bulk-flow model for improved predictions of force coefficients in grooved oil seals operating eccentrically

    ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power

    (2012)
  • J. Gehannin et al.

    Complete squeeze-film damper analysis based on the “bulk flow” equations

    Tribol Trans

    (2010)
  • A. Delgado et al.

    A model for improved prediction of force coefficients in grooved squeeze film dampers and oil seal rings

    ASME J Tribol

    (2010)
  • Kuzdal., MJ, Hustak, JF., 1996, Squeeze film damper bearing experimental vs analytical results for various damper...
  • Edney, S, Nicholas, J., 1999, Retrofitting a large steam turbine with a mechanically centered squeeze film damper. In:...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (39)

  • A double integral method for quantitative evaluation of influence on thin-walled casing response caused by bearing uncertainties

    2020, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, it is difficult to measure the response at the bearing position for gas turbine engines directly. In addition, bearing and SFD dynamic coefficients are easily affected by assembly process, load condition, lubrication state and temperature variation, which results in uncertainties.15–18 Whether through the numerical calculation or component test, it is challenging to obtain exact dynamic coefficients of the bearings and SFD in the working condition.

  • Experimental and numerical investigation on the performance of fluid pivot journal bearing in one-sided floating state

    2019, Tribology International
    Citation Excerpt :

    A comprehensive review of the relevant analytical and experimental work conducted on SFD was provided by Adilleta and Della Pietra [20,21]. San Andrés and co-workers discuss more recent SFD experimental research based on grooved SFD [22–24] and more realistic operating condition such as lubricant cavitation and air entrainment [25,26]. Fluid pivot journal bearing as the improved design of tilting pad journal bearing has been employed in industry for a while expecting to increase the vibration attenuation and reliability demands for advanced machinery such as high-speed compressors, gas/steam turbines and motor spindle etc.

  • Dynamical analysis of an elastic ring squeeze film damper-rotor system

    2019, Mechanism and Machine Theory
    Citation Excerpt :

    Motion bifurcation of a rigid SFD-rotor system considering the effect of fluid inertia was analyzed in [17], to provide a fundamental theory for designing an effective SFD. The work of San Andrés [18] and R. Tiwari [19] clearly demonstrated methods to identify the oil film coefficients of both SFDs and bearings. Various suggestions have been proposed to improve the performance of SFDs, as detailed in Ref. [20].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text