Active vibration isolation of electronic components by piezocomposite clamped–clamped beam

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.12.015Get rights and content

Abstract

The sensitive electronic components used in military and aerospace applications endure some intense vibrations. These vibrations have some disturbing effects on the stability and on the service life of these devices. So, protecting these elements becomes a major economic and strategic stake. Vibration isolation can be applied to different levels of the on-board systems. Indeed, it is advisable to isolate electronic components either at the rack level or at the board level or at the component level. In this paper, the last solution is chosen because of low moving masses which imply low control energies.

An active suspension system is located between the host board and the sensitive element to be isolated. This designed control system uses a simple Integral Force Feedback strategy. This vibration isolation control is stable for its collocated version and does not need a numerical model of the system to be controlled. Robustness of the system is asymptotically guaranteed. The proposed isolation device, made of alumina for passive structure and made of PZT and PVDF for transducing layers, is experimentally tested. Experimental performances are compared with theoretical performances.

Introduction

Vibration isolation is necessary in two broad classes of problems:

  • A vibrating element is fixed on a structure. Mechanical waves propagate through this whole structure. Thus, they can damage the different sensitive elements of the structure or reduce their service life.

  • A sensitive element is fixed on a vibrating structure. So, vibrations can modify operating points of this element but also strongly damage it.

The passive solution is the simplest way to achieve vibration isolation. Several passive techniques are studied in the literature by using elastomer materials [1], by using shape memory alloys [2], [3] or by modifying mechanical impedances [4].

The passive suspension, sketched in Fig. 1, is considered.

The transmissibility of the system, i.e. the relationship between the acceleration of the mass (W¨s) and the acceleration imposed to the support (W¨u) is written in Laplace's variables:TW¨s,W¨u=(W¨)s(W¨)u=s·C+Ks2·M+s·C+Kwhere K is the stiffness of the suspension (N m−1), M the mass of the structure (Kg), C the damping coefficient induced by the suspension (Kg s−1) and s the Laplace's variable.

The objective of any suspension is obviously to limit the acceleration of the system to be isolated in the excitation frequency bandwidth. The behavior of the system is observed in Fig. 2, where different transfer functions are plotted for different damping ratio values ξ=(C/2)(1/MK).

As shown in Fig. 2, this system presents a modal resonance peak that is to say an increasing of the acceleration of the system to be isolated in a narrow frequency bandwidth. Obviously, the modal peaks decrease when the damping ratio of the system increases. Consequently, the resonance amplification decreases and the sensitive mass stability increases in the narrow frequency bandwidth around the considered eigenfrequencies. However, this effect also results in the reduction of a high frequency filtering decay rate. Indeed, this high frequency decay rate evolves from −40 dB/decade, when no structural damping is considered in the suspension, to −20 dB/decade limit for high structural damping ratios, ξ. Thus, it results a bad isolation in high frequency range. Then, it becomes necessary to lower the cut-off frequency to increase the high frequency isolation capability of the suspension. This modification is performed by limiting the stiffness of the connection what involves a loss of stability in low frequencies. Ultimately, the traditional mechanical compromise is in the ratio between the stiffness and the damping ratio of the connection [5].

A best mechanical compromise can be obtained by using an active control process [5]. Sky-hook control is the simplest and the most common control strategy [6]. This isolation method can be stable and robust in its collocated version. The idea is to actively introduce, in the mechanical connection, a viscous damper rigidly fixed to a Galilean coordinate system. The design of this controller is based on an absolute sensing signal such as the acceleration, the transmitted force, the absolute velocity or the absolute displacement. Studies of various sky-hook-type strategies are broadly proposed in the literature [7].

The constant miniaturization of electronic components essential with electronic boards such as the frequency generators, the vibrating gyroscopes and certain accelerometers generates two major difficulties. On the one hand, the size of the soldered connection points is strongly reduced and so the yield strength of these soldered connection points is reached. On the other hand, the dimension reduction of these elements fatally involves the reduction of their useful mass. Then, these electronic components become very sensitive to the external noise and become inefficient and inaccurate. Consequently, the measurement accuracy is lost in signal noise level.

There are various methods to avoid these limitations. Indeed, it is possible to stabilize the sensitive components at level of the racks containing carrying electronic cards. Generally, this solution is obtained by using passive isolation strategies. A second solution involves stabilizing at level of the boards. It is possible to apply some active isolation strategies by using piezoelectric patches [8], [9], [10]. The last solution is to control the electronic components themselves. This paper examines this method. The principal idea is to create “small isolation islands” to individually isolate each sensitive component [11]. The control electronics already presents onto the electronic boards is exploited. The isolation structure will be integrated into the design phase of the electronic circuits. The used control law is founded on a classical collocated “sky-hook” strategy with an internal sensor.

The objective of this study is to design, manufacture and test a isolation meso-structure, so as to prove an active vibration isolation feasibility for a vibration isolation device. The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the operation of the studied active suspension, the experimental device and the way to manufacture it. In Section 3, modeling of the active suspension is provided and an experimental characterization is achieved. This section is a base for the numerical development of the control architecture in Section 4. In the following section, experiments are achieved to clearly set the validity of the control strategy and, thus, of our designed active suspension. These experimental results are compared with the numerical ones. Finally, concluding remarks are discussed.

Section snippets

Operation principle

The basis of an active isolator is the addition of an “active” function to a traditional suspension. The objective is to decrease the resonance peak amplitude without degradation of the high frequency decay rate. The framework of the isolation device constitutes the passive isolator. Sensors and actuators are added to the suspension, as shown in Fig. 3. The sensor monitors the vibratory state of the suspended mass. This strategy is efficient for an absolute information: the acceleration, the

Modeling of the active suspension

An analytical method is used for the modeling. For simplicity, the piezoelectrically actuated beam and the “sensor and mass” unit are separately studied. Finally, the modeling of the whole suspension device is obtained by the assembly of these two parts.

For the modeling, Euler–Bernoulli assumptions are used. The electrodes are neglected. The polling axis is along the Z-axis in the coordinate system described in Fig. 4. Only the first natural bending mode is considered. This bending motion is

Control architecture and experimental setup

The control strategy is based on a piezoelectric layer directly forced by the acceleration of the sensitive system to be isolated. The control process is described in Fig. 13. The controller input is the acceleration measurement. The control signal is amplified and applied to the piezoelectric actuating layers, making it possible to apply a mechanical control force to the system. Moreover, a data acquisition process is used to visualize and save the experimental results. The control system

Concluding remarks

In this paper, a new structural device is proposed to achieve the active vibration isolation of electronic components for military and aerospace applications. This device is based on an alumina clamped–clamped beam with PZT and PVDF transducing layers. The control law is based on an Integral Force Feedback control strategy.

The experimental results show an important resonance peak attenuation of the first bending mode of the system. For a random excitation with a 10 grms amplitude and a 200 volts

References (23)

  • J.E. Lagneses et al.

    Modeling Analysis and Control of Thin Plates

    (1988)
  • Cited by (17)

    • Vibration isolation and damping using a piezoelectric flextensional suspension with a negative capacitance shunt

      2020, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
      Citation Excerpt :

      In our case, the piezoelectric suspension is a passive component, used as a suspension for vibration isolation which consists in reducing the transmission of vibration between 2 elements, sometimes called the noisy and the quiet side [32,8,26,19]. The isolator can be passive (spring and viscous damper in parallel) and, depending on the application, it can be more complex and active Meyer and Collet [24] as in the case of electromagnetism or be piezoelectrically linear or nonlinear. The performance of the suspension is evaluated in terms of displacement transmissibility between the source and the support [31,27].

    • Microstructures and mechanical properties of brazed Al<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf>/Cu joints with bismuth glass

      2019, Ceramics International
      Citation Excerpt :

      At present, integrated circuits are becoming smaller and denser, and the number of electronic components per unit area has doubled [5–7], which requires a stable external environment for the normal operation. There are two methods most commonly used to protect electronic components [8,9], one is coating polymer materials on its surface, or casting plastic parts around electronic components [10]. The other method is encapsulating electronic components with metal [11].

    • Fabrication and characterization of PZT string based MEMS devices

      2016, Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices
      Citation Excerpt :

      These vibrations have some disturbing effects on the stability and on the service life of the devices. In this case, the string like structure can isolate such vibrations either at the rack, board level or at the component level [5]. MEMS and NEMS have been developing rapidly for a wide variety of applications in the last decade.

    • Active vibration control of a full scale aircraft wing using a reconfigurable controller

      2016, Journal of Sound and Vibration
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus the advancements in the field of “Smart Structures” have ushered in change of approach to control system design. In the initial years, the piezoelectric (PZT: Lead Zirconate Titanate) based actuators and Poly Vinylidyne Flouride (PVDFs) have been used in the control of vibration using feedback control strategy in military and aerospace applications [3]. There have been studies leading to the design of active flutter suppression systems using classical control concepts such as root locus approach, as well as modern control technique [4–6].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text