Numerical solution of hydraulic models based on the axially-dispersed plug flow model by Laplace transforms
References (21)
- et al.
Anal. Chim. Acta
(1986) - et al.
Chem. Eng. Sci.
(1956) - et al.
Chem. Eng. Sci.
(1957) - et al.
Chem. Eng. Sci.
(1975) - et al.
Comput. Chem. Eng.
(1980) - et al.
Chem. Eng. J.
(1974) Chem. Eng. Sci.
(1969)- et al.
Adv. Chem. Eng.
(1963) - et al.
Chem. Eng. Commun.
(1980) Electron. Lett.
(1969)
Cited by (20)
Chapter 3 Theoretical Basis of Flow Injection Analysis
2008, Comprehensive Analytical ChemistryCitation Excerpt :Such a solution is usually a cumbersome expression and its inverse transformation into the time domain is possible only by numerical methods. Kolev and Pungor [98] have compared existing methods for numerical inverse Laplace transformation. They have established that best results, with respect to precision and consumption of computation time, are offered by the methods employing expansion of the Laplace domain function into Chebyshov polynomials of the first kind or into Fourier sine series.
Mass distribution in a dynamic sample zone inside a flow injection manifold: Modelling integrated conductimetric profiles
2003, Analytica Chimica ActaCitation Excerpt :Several models have been proposed in order to describe and/or predict dispersion in FI systems. These models range from the more theoretical partial differential equations [7,13–21] to the more pragmatic neural networks (i.e. see [22]). Most of them are able to describe dispersion in a wide variety of FI systems.
Mathematical modelling of potentiometric stripping analysis in mechanically mixed solutions
1996, Analytica Chimica ActaMathematical modelling of flow-injection systems
1995, Analytica Chimica ActaApplication of Laplace transforms for the solution of transient mass- and heat-transfer problems in flow systems
1993, International Journal of Heat and Mass TransferMathematical modelling of a flow-injection system with a membrane separation module
1992, Analytica Chimica Acta