Review article
On-road assessment of driving competence after brain impairment: Review of current practice and recommendations for a standardized examination,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90277-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: To examine the approaches to on-road assessment of driver competence in persons with brain impairment. Items examined were procedures, standardization, scoring methods, equipment requirements, and determination of fitness to drive.

Data Sources: All studies identified through citation or Medline search.

Study Selection: The studies reviewed were those published from 1971 to the present that examined driving competence after brain impairment, as measured by a driving test.

Data Extraction: A qualitative review of published studies reporting methodologies and authors' conclusions abstracted from sourced publications.

Data Synthesis: Off-road driving assessments examine proficiency in operating a motor vehicle, but not ability to drive in traffic or accurate prediction of safe driving. On-road driving assessments have been used to examine the predictive validity of other driving assessment methods or the driving performance of subjects with brain impairment. Determining a subject's competence to drive is frequently a subjective evaluation. With a standardized driving test, a significant correlation between the objective driving score and the rater's global evaluation of fitness has been reported.

Conclusion: Closed-course, off-road driving tests are recommended for examining vehicle operation skills and readiness for in-traffic evaluation only. This allows practice with any vehicle adaptations before on-road evaluation and identification of clients who are unsafe to proceed on-road. A practical driving test in traffic, with standardized route and driving maneuvers, is recommended for determining driver competence. Scoring of driving performance should be standardized, reliable, and specific, to identify deficient driving skills that may be amenable to training. Driving performance should be evaluated according to predefined criteria, and the judgment regarding competence should be closely related to this objective measure.

References (39)

  • TA Ranney

    Models of driving behavior: a review of their evolution

    Accid Anal Prev

    (1994)
  • JA Michon

    Explanatory pitfalls and rule-based driver models

    Accid Anal Prev

    (1989)
  • JE Korteling et al.

    Neuropsychological driving fitness tests for brain-damaged subjects

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1996)
  • ES Engum et al.

    Criterion-related validity of the cognitive behavioral driver's index

    Cogn Rehabil

    (1989)
  • T Galski et al.

    An assessment of measures to predict the outcome of driving evaluations in patients with cerebral damage

    Am J Occup Ther

    (1990)
  • FM Nouri et al.

    Validation of a cognitive assessment: predicting driving performance after stroke

    Clin Rehabil

    (1992)
  • L Evans

    Traffic safety and the driver

    (1991)
  • WL Mihal et al.

    Individual differences in perceptual information processing and their relation to automobile accident involvement

    J Appl Psychol

    (1976)
  • AH Van Zomeren et al.

    Acquired brain damage and driving: a review

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1987)
  • JL Bardach

    Psychological factors in the handicapped driver

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1971)
  • R Jones et al.

    Assessment and training of brain-damaged drivers

    Am J Occup Ther

    (1983)
  • FL Quigley et al.

    Assessing the driving potential of cerebral vascular accident patients

    Am J Occup Ther

    (1983)
  • CA Hopewell et al.

    Neuropsychological aspects of motor vehicle operation

  • PF Waller

    Renewal licensing of older drivers

  • K Ball et al.

    Identifying correlates of accident involvement for the older driver

    Hum Factors

    (1991)
  • T Galski et al.

    Driving after cerebral damage: a model with implications for evaluation

    Am J Occup Ther

    (1992)
  • J Fodor

    Modularity of mind

    (1986)
  • JA Michon

    Dealing with danger

  • W Brouwer et al.

    Compensatory potential in elderly drivers

  • Cited by (0)

    Supported by research grants awarded by the Australian Rotary Health Research Fund and the Northern Sydney Area Health Service.

    ☆☆

    No commercial party having a direct or indirect interest in the subject matter of this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

    View full text