Elsevier

Chemical Physics Letters

Volume 346, Issues 5–6, 12 October 2001, Pages 387-392
Chemical Physics Letters

Low-frequency large-amplitude vibrations of julolidine in the S0 and S1 states

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(01)00981-2Get rights and content

Abstract

The vibrational modes of julolidine in the ground- and the first-excited states have been investigated by laser-induced fluorescence (LIF), multiphoton ionization (MPI) and dispersed emission spectroscopy. In the observed LIF excitation spectrum the mode 140cm−1 appears and is assigned to the N-inversion mode of the S1 state which gets coupled with the ring puckering modes of the fused saturated six-membered ring. A progression of 148cm−1 intervals appears in the dispersed emission spectra, which on the basis of semi-empirical calculations has been identified as the N-inversion mode of the ground state.

Introduction

Spectroscopic investigations of low-frequency large-amplitude vibrations are of relevance to the determination of the labile structures of molecules. The classical well studied examples of the low-frequency modes are the umbrella inversion of sp3 N-atom as in ammonia, aniline and substituted N-methyl anilines (e.g., indoline) [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], the puckering of cyclic ring systems as in cyclopentanone, cyclopentene, indane, phthalan, tetralin, tetrahydroquinoline (THQ), tetrahydroisoquinoline (THIQ) [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], and the butterfly motion as in fluorobenzene, dihydroanthracene, xanthene and octafluoronaphthalene [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. The low-frequency torsional mode usually appears as a long progression of overtones in biphenyl and dihydrophenanthrene, from which the structures of the concerned molecules [20], [21], [22] have been predicted. Indeed, the analysis of high-resolution spectral data provides information on not only different structures of a molecule in S0 and S1 states, but also on the barrier energies for inter-conversion from one conformer to another.

The high-resolution spectroscopy of amino-derivatives of benzene is of interest to chemists. The planarity of the benzene molecule is perturbed by the introduction of non-planar substituents, such as –NH2, NMe2, and –CH3 groups; it may be expected that the spectra of such benzene derivatives might lead to a better understanding of the coupling of the out-of-plane torsional and inversion modes. A detailed vibrational analysis has been made by Brand et al. for the aniline vapour spectrum [2], [23]. They assigned several strong bands to the inversion of the –NH2 group, which was found to be strongly anharmonic in the ground-electronic state. Several studies of dimethylaniline (DMA) and dimethylaminobenzonitrile (DMABN) cooled in a supersonic jet expansion have been attempted. The observed spectra exhibit a weak origin and long Frank–Condon progression of a low-frequency vibrational modes. A jet-cooled REMPI study of DMABN and DMA assigned the observed low-frequency modes in the S0→S1 spectrum to the torsion of the whole dimethylamino-substituent about the Caryl–N bond [24]. Based on the Frank–Condon analysis, the authors concluded that the minimum energy configuration of the amino-group in DMA and DMABN is twisted by about 30° in the S1 state relative to the minimum energy configuration of the S0 state. Their fluorescence excitation (FE) and SVL spectra provide evidence of coupling between methyl torsion and inversion modes in the S0 state [25], [26].

In this Letter we investigate the vibrational modes of julolidine in the S0 and S1 states by FE, SVL and multiphoton ionization (MPI) measurements. The structure of the molecule julolidine has similarity with that of coumarin 153 (C-153) and coumarin 337 (C-337). Topp et al. [28] considered only two conformers in C-153, one syn and the other anti. However, additional conformers are possible in the anti-form depending on the out-of-plane alignment of the substituents on the benzene ring. The present case of julolidine is a simpler one where it is possible to focus only on the synanti conformers whose relative energies remain unmodified by substituents. Semi-empirical calculations have been performed for the two low-energy conformers in order to correlate the experimental results.

Section snippets

Experimental

The compound julolidine as obtained from Aldrich is of 97% purity. This was further purified by vacuum sublimation. The details of the supersonic jet set-up is described elsewhere [27]. In brief, the sample was heated to 120 °C to increase sample vapour pressure and then expanded with helium as carrier gas into a vacuum chamber through a 0.5 mm diameter orifice of a pulsed nozzle valve (General Valve) with a frequency of 10 Hz. The background pressure of the chamber during the experiment was

Theoretical calculation

A number of chair and boat combinations are possible for julolidine, as will be evident from a Dreiding model of the molecule.

The symmetrical double half-chair conformer (syn-conformer) is expected to be the lower energy conformer from following simple considerations. In the syn-form C2–H/C3–H or C2–H/C3–H pairs of bonds are not parallel to each other, though C2–H, C2–H bonds are. Since, the C2 and C2 are connected through the N-atom, but not directly, the C2–H, C2–H bond repulsive

Conclusion

The low-frequency vibrations of julolidine in the ground and excited states have been studied by LIF, SVL and MPI spectroscopy. The ground state shows a long progression of bands at 148cm−1 intervals in the SVL spectra; this frequency has been assigned to the N-inversion mode. However, the N-inversion is coupled with ring puckering. Due to the ring strain developed during the inversion process, the out-of-plane N-inversion oscillates between a near-planar conformation and a tetrahedral

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge financial support from DST over past years. One of the authors (S.B.) is grateful to the CSIR for providing him a JRF fellowship.

References (28)

  • N. Mikami et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (1980)
  • N. Guchhait et al.

    J. Mol. Struct.

    (1994)
  • K.H. Hassan et al.

    J. Mol. Spectrosc.

    (1991)
  • N. Guchhait et al.

    Chem. Phys.

    (1996)
  • T. Chakraborty et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (1990)
  • T. Chakraborty et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (1991)
  • J.C.D. Brand et al.

    J. Mol. Spectrosc.

    (1966)
  • B.A. Pryor et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (1999)
  • B.S. Coon et al.

    J. Mol. Spectrosc.

    (1966)
  • D.A. Chernoff et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (1979)
  • H.S. Im et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (1991)
  • E.M. Gibson et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (1988)
  • J. Zhang et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (1994)
  • J. Laane et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (1957)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text