Electrochemistry at liquid/liquid interfaces: methodology and potential applications

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00343-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Electrochemistry at the interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions (ITIES) gains more and more interest due to its wide range of applications. The present review encompasses the various domains of charge transfer reactions in biphasic systems, with some emphasis on certain studies that marked the advances of electrochemistry at ITIES and that, in a noticeable manner, have been presented in large majority at the ISE meetings during the last two decades. These studies, as well as some subjects in which our recent research interest is concerned, are used here to describe the fundamental aspects of charge transfer reactions at liquid/liquid interfaces and to outline their various applications. This overview presents the methodologies offered by the ITIES in the fields of amperometric sensors, solvent extraction, pharmacokinetics, thermo-electricity and solar energy conversion, and the accent is put on the perspectives of their potential development in the coming years.

Introduction

Electrochemistry at the interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions is a rather new topic of electrochemistry, which has been present at every meeting of the International Society of Electrochemistry (ISE) for the last decade.

The first experiments in the field were reported at the end of the last century, but it was only in the 1970s that the subject enjoyed a new era of growth. The pioneer of this renewed interest in the field was Claude Gavach in France who started to apply electrochemical methods to study ion transfer reactions [1], [2], [3], [4].

Then, the relay was taken by the Heyrovsky Institute in Prague under the influence of Professor Koryta [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11] former president of the ISE (1985–1986). It was around this time that the acronym ITIES (interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions) was coined and has remained ever since. When the ISE meeting was held in Prague in 1990, a plenary lecture entitled: ‘Electrochemical Processes at the Interface between Two Immiscible Solutions of Electrolytes’ was given by Professor Senda who has been the pioneer of the field in Japan. This plenary lecture was followed by the first ISE micro symposium on Immiscible Electrolytes with Professor T. Kakiuchi as Chairman.

In this review article, we shall first recall the fundamental aspects of charge transfer reactions at the ITIES and we shall present our views on some potential applications.

Section snippets

Interfacial structure

The interface between two solvents is by nature a molecular interface with its own dynamics. It is characterised by the fact that it is difficult to define an interfacial structure or thickness as the time scale becomes a parameter of the definition. Is the interface sharp or diffuse? The answer to this question is timescale dependent.

From an experimental viewpoint, capillary wave measurements by X-ray or neutron scattering [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17] did not provide yet a proper

Amperometric sensors and ionodes

Ion selective electrodes rely on ion or facilitated ion transfer reactions to establish a potential difference that depends on the concentration of the target ions. Potentiometric sensors depend on thermodynamic equilibria and can therefore be used to measure activities. Amperometric sensors on the other hand depend on diffusion controlled mass transfer and are therefore proportional to the concentrations. Considering that both ion transfer and assisted ion transfer reactions are reversible,

Conclusion

If the field of electrochemistry of liquid/liquid interfaces has progressed rapidly over the last couple of decades, many issues are still a matter of debate.

From a theoretical viewpoint, the key aspects of potential distribution remain the major challenge. Without a good modelling of the potential distribution, in the absence or in the presence of specific adsorption, it will be difficult to progress in the kinetics analysis of charge transfer reactions. However, considering that most transfer

Acknowledgements

The authors want to express their gratitude to Professor Z. Samec from the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic and to Professor T. Kakiuchi from the Kyoto University of Japan for fruitful discussions and helpful comments on this paper.

References (185)

  • C. Gavach et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1974)
  • C. Gavach et al.

    Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg.

    (1974)
  • C. Gavach et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1974)
  • Z. Samec et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1977)
  • J. Koryta

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1979)
  • J. Koryta et al.

    Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg.

    (1980)
  • J. Koryta

    Ion-Sel. Electrode Rev.

    (1983)
  • J. Koryta

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1986)
  • J. Koryta

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1988)
  • J. Als-Nielsen

    J. Phys. A

    (1986)
  • M. Gros et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1978)
  • Z. Samec et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1981)
  • W. Schmickler

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1999)
  • Z. Samec et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1985)
  • T. Wandlowski et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1995)
  • V. Marecek et al.

    Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (1988)
  • M. Senda et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1991)
  • T. Kakiuchi et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1992)
  • Y. Shao et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1991)
  • D. Homolka et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1982)
  • T. Kakiuchi et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1991)
  • F. Reymond et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1998)
  • F. Reymond et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1998)
  • H.H. Girault

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1995)
  • B.B. Smith et al.

    Chem. Phys.

    (1996)
  • Z. Samec

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1979)
  • W. Schmickler

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1997)
  • Z. Ding et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1998)
  • V. Marecek et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1987)
  • V. Marecek et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1988)
  • V. Marecek et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1989)
  • E. Wang et al.

    Trends Anal. Chem.

    (1988)
  • J. Koryta et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1976)
  • J. Koryta et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1977)
  • V. Marecek et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1983)
  • V. Marecek et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1986)
  • H.J. Lee et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1998)
  • H.J. Lee et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1997)
  • F. Silva et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1997)
  • H.J. Lee et al.

    Electrochem. Comm.

    (1999)
  • J. Koryta

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1987)
  • O. Shirai et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1995)
  • R.D. Armstrong et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1992)
  • V. Horvath et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1993)
  • C.J. Bender et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1987)
  • J. Kutnik et al.

    Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg.

    (1986)
  • T. Kakiuchi

    Electrochim. Acta

    (1998)
  • C. Gavach

    Experientia

    (1971)
  • D. Homolka et al.

    Anal. Chem.

    (1980)
  • D. Baeglehole

    Experimental studies of liquid interfaces

  • Cited by (269)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text