Remediation technologies for metal-contaminated soils and groundwater: an evaluation
Introduction
In the United States, 1200 sites are on the National Priority List (NPL) for the treatment of contaminated soils, indicating the extensiveness of this problem. Approximately 63% of the sites on the NPL include contamination from toxic heavy metals (Hazardous Waste Consultant, 1996). For example, lead was found at 15% of the sites, followed by chromium, cadmium and copper at 11, 8 and 7% of the sites, respectively. Therefore, metal contamination is a major problem.
Cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel and zinc are considered the most hazardous and are included on the US Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) list of priority pollutants (Cameron, 1992). Sources of metals include domestic and industrial effluents, the atmosphere, runoff and lithosphere. Once metals are allowed to pass through the municipal waste treatment facility, the heavy ones return to the environment where they are persistent, cannot be biodegraded and can thus follow a number of different pathways. The metals can adsorb onto the soil, runoff into rivers or lakes or leach in the groundwater, an important source of drinking water. Exposure to the heavy metals through ingestion or uptake of drinking water (particularly where water is reused) and foods can lead to accumulation in animals, plants and humans. This phenomenon can lead to extinction or alteration of plants and animals. Metals can accumulate in the following order, river sediments, bacteria, tubicids and then fish and man if one consumes these fish.
Over the past years, use of metals such as copper, cadmium and zinc have increased substantially (Table 1). Copper is produced more than any other metal, whereas more zinc reaches the soil than any other metal. Lead use has decreased due to toxicity concerns. In Canada, according to the National Pollutant Release Inventory, approximately 13,300 ton of copper, 9500 ton of zinc, 1300 ton of lead and 33 ton of cadmium were released to the air, water and soil (NPRI, 1995).
In view of the extensiveness of metals in the environment, this paper describes the fate and transport of selected metals and technologies for remediation that are full-scale and developing. This information will assist in the selection of the appropriate technology for treatment of metal-contaminated soils and sediments.
Section snippets
Mobility of metals
In its natural form, cadmium is relatively rare and concentrated in argillaceous and shale deposits as greenockite (CdS) or otavite (CdCO3) and is usually associated with zinc, lead or copper in sulfide form (Cameron, 1992). It is a bluish-white soft metal or grayish powder. It is more mobile, though, than zinc at low pH, particularly at pH values between 4.5 and 5.5. Above pH 7.5, cadmium is not very mobile. Its divalent form is soluble but it can also complex with organics and oxides. A
Metal speciation
The term speciation is related to the distribution of an element among chemical forms or species. Heavy metals can occur in several forms in water and soils. Interest has increased in sequential extraction techniques to relate the degree of mobility with risk assessment, (i.e. the more mobile the metal is, the more risk associated with it (Bourg, 1995)) and as a method of designing remediation techniques (Mulligan et al., 1999b). Not only is total metal concentration of interest, but is also
Isolation and containment
Contaminants can be isolated and contained, to prevent further movement, to reduce the permeability of the waste to less than 1×10−7 m/s (as required by the U.S. EPA) and to increase the strength or bearing capacity of the waste (USEPA, 1994). Physical barriers made of steel, cement, bentonite and grout walls can be used for capping, vertical and horizontal containment. Capping is a site-specific proven technology to reduce water infiltration. Synthetic membranes can be used for this purpose.
Conclusions
A summary of the various remediation techniques is shown in Table 3. Physical containment is the least expensive approach but this leaves the contaminants in place without treatment. Since metals are considered relatively immobile, methods for metal decontamination have focused on solid-phase processes such as solidification/stabilization and vitrification. These processes can be performed in situ which reduces handling costs. Costs depend on presence of debris, excess moisture, contaminant
References (55)
- et al.
Electrokinetic remediation: basics and technology status
J. Hazard. Mater.
(1995) - et al.
Treatments of water hyancinth tissue to obtain useful products
Biol. Wastes
(1990) Metal ion speciation — soils and sediments (a review)
Ore Geol. Rev.
(1986)- American Academy of Environmental Engineers (AAEE), 1993. Soil Washing/Soil Flushing, Innovative Site Remediation....
- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1995. Division of Toxicology,...
- Baker, A.J.M., Reeves, R.D., McGrath, S.P., 1991. In situ decontamination of heavy metal polluted soils using crops of...
- et al.
Bioleaching of metals from sewage sludge by sulfur-oxidizing bacteria
J. Environ. Engng
(1992) Speciation of Heavy Metals and Implications for their Mobility
(1995)The green clean: the emerging field of phytoremediation takes root
Bioscience
(1995)- Cameron, R.E., 1992. Guide to Site and Soil Description for Hazardous Waste Site Characterization. Volume 1: Metals....