Relationship Between Patterns of Bleeding and Hemoccult Sensitivity in Patients with Colorectal Cancers or Adenomas

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(82)80252-7Get rights and content

Although Hemoccult (Smith Kline Diagnostics, Inc., Sunnyvale, Calif.) screening for colorectal cancer is based on detection of the peroxidase activity of blood, little is known about the relationship between patterns of bleeding from cancers or adenomas and sensitivity of the test slides. 51Cr-labeled blood loss was measured for a mean of 9.1 days in 46 patients with colorectal cancer and 28 with adenomas. Duplicate sets of Hemoccult II slides were prepared by the patients and mailed for testing with and without preliminary rehydration. Mean blood loss was significantly related to the site of the cancers, but was unrelated to Dukes' staging. Geometric mean levels of blood loss from the cancers were 9.3 ml/day for cecum and ascending colon, 1.5 ml/day for trans-verse and descending colon, 1.9 ml/day for sigmoid colon, and 1.8 ml/day for rectum. Rehydration increased Hemoccult sensitivity for blood independently of storage delay, almost doubling sensitivity at the levels of bleeding commonly encountered with cancers of the left side of the colon. Relating results to testing over 3 days, the Hemoccult falsenegative rate for cancer was 31% without rehydration, falling to 9% with rehydration. With adenomas, blood loss and Hemoccult positivity were closely related to lesion size. The findings support the validity of 3-day occult blood testing as a method of screening for colorectal cancers and large adenomas, provided the test employed has a high sensitivity for blood. Further information is needed about the specificity of rehydrated Hemoccult slides in subjects following diets of differing peroxidase content. The degree to which rehydration of slides lowers the false-negative rate for cancer indicates that this modification of slide development should be evaluated in large population screening programs.

References (39)

  • JD Ostrow et al.

    Limiting factors in screening for gastrointestinal tumors with Hemoccult

    Digestion

    (1977)
  • DJB St John et al.

    Evaluation of radio chromium blood loss studies in unexplained iron-deficiency anaemia

    Aust NZ J Med

    (1978)
  • ML Bassett et al.

    False positive and negative Hemoccult reactions on a normal diet and effect of diet restriction

    Aust NZ J Med

    (1980)
  • M Roche et al.

    Study of urinary and fecal excretion of radioactive chromium Cr51 in man: its use in the measurement of intestinal blood loss associated with hookworm infection

    J Clin Invest

    (1957)
  • The International Committee for Standardization in Hematology

    Recommended methods for radioisotope red cell survival studies

    Blood

    (1971)
  • CE Dukes

    The classification of cancer of the rectum

    J Pathol Bacteriol

    (1932)
  • EG Muir

    The diagnosis of carcinoma of the colon and rectum: a review of 714 cases

    Br J Surg

    (1956)
  • MT Pheils et al.

    Colorectal carcinoma: a prospective clinicopathological study

    Med J Aust

    (1976)
  • ML Bassett et al.

    Colorectal cancer: a study of 230 patients

    Med J Aust

    (1979)
  • Cited by (257)

    • Cancer screening and prevention: Sex and gender evidence in lung, breast, and colorectal cancer

      2020, How Sex and Gender Impact Clinical Practice: an Evidence-Based Guide to Patient Care
    • Colorectal Cancer

      2021, Cancer Screening: Theory and Practice
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This project was supported by the Anti-Cancer Council of Victoria. The results were presented in part to the Gastroenterological Society of Australia in Melbourne in May 1980, and to the American Gastroenterological Association in New York in May 1981.

    The authors thank the surgeons—particularly Professor Sir Edward Hughes and Mr. J.C.B. Penfold—who referred patients for study, Miss R. McGennisken, Mr. P. Caligiore, Mr. J. Lee, and Mrs. M. Clarke for their technical and secretarial assistance, and Dr. J.D. Mathews and Dr. K. Sharpe for statistical advice.

    **

    Dr. F.A. Macrae was a Medical Postgraduate Research Scholar of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

    View full text