Protein trafficking in malaria-infected erythrocytes

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(98)00132-5Get rights and content

Abstract

The malaria parasite invades the human erythrocyte and converts this simple sack of haemoglobin back into a functional eukaryotic cell. Parasite-encoded proteins are trafficked to the red blood cell membrane where they modify its properties to meet the needs of the intracellular parasite. Trafficking of proteins within the parasite probably occurs via a classical vesicle-mediated secretory pathway; however, the transit of proteins from the parasite plasma membrane to the erythrocyte membrane appears to involve both a novel vesicle-mediated pathway and a direct protein-translocation system. The polypeptide signals that direct parasite proteins into these novel export pathways may include an unusual internal hydrophobic sequence, as well as a series of basic motifs.

Introduction

The classical protein secretory pathway in eukaryotic cells involves the transport of proteins between intracellular organelles by the budding and fusion of small vesicles. Exported proteins transit through the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the Golgi apparatus, prior to release, by exocytosis, at the cell surface. The polypeptide signal which directs proteins to the secretory pathway is a hydrophobic segment near the N-terminus of the protein sequence [1]. Additional targeting signals are used to divert proteins to other compartments (e.g., to the lysosome or to a regulated secretory compartment; see [2], for review). Protein trafficking in malaria-infected erythrocytes has an added level of complexity in that the parasite exports proteins beyond the confines of its own plasma membrane, to achieve extensive modifications of both the cytoplasm and the plasma membrane of the host r.b.c. (Fig. 1) 3, 4.

In the mature stages of the intra-erythrocytic cycle, the membrane of the erythrocyte becomes distorted with knobby protrusions. These knobs are involved in cytoadherence of infected erythrocytes to the vascular endothelium [5]. The adhesive structures are formed by deposition of parasite proteins underneath the erythrocyte membrane and insertion of proteins into the erythrocyte membrane bilayer (Fig. 2). Two major components of these knobs are a peripheral membrane protein, the knob-associated histidine-rich protein (KAHRP), which forms the major structural element of the knob [6]and an integral membrane protein, the P. falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein-1 (PfEMP-1), which is inserted into the erythrocyte membrane and acts as the ligand for binding to endothelial cell receptors 7, 8, 9. To target proteins to the r.b.c. membrane, the parasite has to transport them past its own plasma membrane (PM) across the parasitophorous vacuolar membrane (PVM) and then out to the r.b.c. membrane (Fig. 1). Although the molecular machinery involved in the external part of this transport system is largely uncharacterised, it presumably involves unusual, parasite-specific components.

Section snippets

Trafficking of proteins within the malaria parasite

Elements of the classical vesicle-mediated secretory pathway for the export of proteins are present within the cytoplasm of the malaria parasite and appear to be involved in the transport of proteins to the parasite PM. Homologues of a number of trafficking components have been found (see Fig. 1), including the ER molecular chaperone, Pfgrp [10], the P. falciparum ER calcium-binding protein (PfERC) which is a reticulocalbin homologue [11], a homologue of the KDEL-binding protein, PfERD2 [12]and

Export of proteins to different destinations

A major unanswered question with regard to protein export in malaria-infected erythrocytes is how are proteins, that are destined for external compartments, trafficked across the two membranes that separate the parasite and erythrocyte cytoplasms. Some potential pathways for the export of proteins to the parasitophorous vacuole (PV), the erythrocyte cytoplasm and the erythrocyte membrane, respectively, are shown diagrammatically in Fig. 2. Proteins, such as S-antigen, the merozoite surface

Trafficking machinery in the erythrocyte cytoplasm

Ultrastructural studies reveal a variety of membranous structures in the r.b.c. cytoplasm (see [28], for review). Some of these may be involved in protein trafficking. The most prominent structure is the complex tubulovesicular network (TVN) which appears to be a series of blind appendices extending out from and wholly connected to the PVM 29, 30, 31. Interestingly, sphingomyelin synthase activity, which is found mainly in the Golgi of other eukaryotic cells [32], appears to be at least

Polypeptide signals that determine trafficking destinations

The other major unanswered question with regard to protein trafficking in malaria-infected erythrocytes is the nature of the polypeptide secretory signals. An analysis of the protein sequences of the parasite proteins that are exported to the r.b.c. cytosol reveals some rather unusual motifs. A hydropathy plot of the first 100 amino acids (aa) of some secreted parasite proteins is shown in Fig. 3. Proteins such as S-antigen, that are transported to the PV, have a classical hydrophobic

The future for protein trafficking studies in malaria

Much of our current knowledge of the nature of the polypeptide signals that control trafficking to different compartments in higher eukaryotes comes from very elegant studies involving the construction of chimeric proteins, in which a putative signal is appended to a reporter protein. The gene for the chimeric protein is transfected into the cell of interest and the fate of the reporter protein is monitored. Until recently, it has not been possible to perform similar experiments in

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Dr Alan Hibbs, Epworth Hospital, Richmond, Australia, for useful discussions and to Dr Denise Mattei, Pasteur Institute, France, for sharing unpublished data.

References (69)

  • KR Lingelbach

    Exp Parasitol

    (1993)
  • M Foley et al.

    A review. Parasitol Today

    (1995)
  • XZ Su et al.

    Cell

    (1995)
  • DI Baruch et al.

    Cell

    (1995)
  • JD Smith et al.

    Cell

    (1995)
  • N Kumar et al.

    Mol Biochem Parasitol

    (1991)
  • G Langsley et al.

    Exp Parasitol

    (1996)
  • HG Elmendorf et al.

    Mol Biochem Parasitol

    (1992)
  • K Hinterberg et al.

    Exp Parasitol

    (1994)
  • GE Ward et al.

    Parasitol Today

    (1997)
  • M Aikawa et al.

    Exp Parasitol

    (1990)
  • M Foley et al.

    Mol Biochem Parasitol

    (1991)
  • BS Crabb et al.

    Cell

    (1997)
  • M Aikawa

    Cell

    (1988)
  • R Behari et al.

    Exp Parasitol

    (1994)
  • D Jeckel et al.

    FEBS Lett

    (1990)
  • M Aikawa

    Exp Parasitol

    (1971)
  • AR Hibbs et al.

    Exp Parasitol

    (1994)
  • B Knapp et al.

    Mol Biochem Parasitol

    (1989)
  • JF Kun et al.

    Mol Biochem Parasitol

    (1997)
  • K Gunther et al.

    Mol Biochem Parasitol

    (1991)
  • U Kara et al.

    Mol Biochem Parasitol

    (1990)
  • L Tabe et al.

    Identification of an ovalbumin signal sequence. J Mol Biol

    (1984)
  • K Nakai et al.

    Genomics

    (1992)
  • J Robbins et al.

    Cell

    (1991)
  • SC Nicholls et al.

    Mol Biochem Parasitol

    (1988)
  • JL Weber et al.

    J Biol Chem

    (1988)
  • RG Ridley et al.

    Mol Biochem Parasitol

    (1990)
  • AW Thomas et al.

    Mol Biochem Parasitol

    (1990)
  • D Nolte et al.

    Mol Biochem Parasitol

    (1991)
  • B Knapp et al.

    Mol Biochem Parasitol

    (1989)
  • J Ellis et al.

    Mol Biochem Parasitol

    (1987)
  • RL Coppel

    Mol Biochem Parasitol

    (1992)
  • J Kyte et al.

    J Mol Biol

    (1982)
  • Cited by (37)

    • Plasmodium falciparum ARFGAP: Expression and crystallization of the catalytic domain

      2004, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Proteins and Proteomics
    • Plasmodium falciparum falcilysin: A metalloprotease with dual specificity

      2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      FLN staining was confined to the parasite body, because it is internal to the signal of LWL-1, a resident protein of the parasitophorous vacuolar membrane that delimits the parasite. It is possible that FLN, which lacks a signal peptide (11) and exhibits no change in localization after Brefeldin A treatment, is located in or traffics through the vesicles associated with the alternative secretory pathway characterized by Brefeldin A-independent secretion (26–28). Previous work analyzing the biosynthesis of falcilysin indicates that the enzyme does not require proteolytic processing to be active (11).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text