Systematic relationships of some members of the genera Oesophagostomum and Chabertia (Nematoda: Chabertiidae) based on ribosomal dna sequence datafn1

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(98)00144-1Get rights and content

Abstract

The present study characterised seven species of the Chabertiidae (Nematoda: Strongyloidea) belonging to either the subfamily Oesophagostominae (Oesophagostomum radiatum, Oesophagostomum venulosum, Oesophagostomum dentatum, Oesophagostomum quadrispinulatum, Oesophagostomum columbianum, Oesophagostomum bifurcum) or to the subfamily Chabertiinae (Chabertia ovina) by their second internal transcribed spacer rDNA sequence, assessed the extent of intraspecific variation and interspecific differences in the sequence, and inferred the phylogenetic relationship of C. ovina with respect to members of the Oesophagostominae. In both the phenetic and cladistic analyses of the sequence data, Chabertia was nested within Oesophagostomum, suggesting either that the species examined represent members of the same genus, or alternatively, that Oesophagostomum may represent more than one genus.

Introduction

Various studies have examined the evolutionary history of the parasitic strongylid nematodes based on morphological data and relationships with their hosts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. However, for many groups of parasitic nematodes, their relatively simple body plan and limited morphological differentiation between related taxa provide a poor basis upon which to construct phylogenies. Such is the case for strongylid nematodes (order Strongylida), where the proposed phylogenetic relationships of different superfamilies and families based on morphological characters are somewhat speculative [7]. At the subfamily level, for example, conflicting phylogenetic relationships have been proposed for different subfamilies of the Trichostrongylidae 4, 5, 8 and the Chabertiidae 2, 9.

The family Chabertiidae (Strongyloidea) is characterised by the possession of four branches to the dorsal ray and a J-shaped ovejector [2]. It includes two subfamilies, the Chabertiinae and the Oesophagostominae. The former occurs in rumi- nants and rodents and is characterised by a large subglobular buccal capsule but lacking a cervical groove, while the latter occurs in ruminants, pigs, rodents and primates and possesses a small cylindrical buccal capsule and a cervical groove in some genera [2]. Developmental studies have shown that fourth-stage larvae of Oesophagostomum venulosum have subglobular buccal capsules, a characteristic feature of the Chabertiinae, while the adult has a cylindrical buccal capsule [10], the presence of a globular buccal capsule being a plesiomorphic character in cladistic analyses of the Strongyloidea 2, 11. It has been suggested that more work is required to evaluate the importance of buccal capsule size and shape [4], while the cervical groove at the level of the excretory pore occurs only in the tribe Oesophagostominea 1, 2.

Phylogenetic studies of the Chabertiidae utilising host preference and morphological characters of the parasites have regarded the Chabertiinae and Oesophagostominae as separate but related subfamilies 1, 2, 4, 9, with the Oesophagostominae derived from the Chabertiinae. Studies examining the evolutionary relationships of subgenera within the genus Oesophagostomum 3, 12, including species that infect ruminants, African suids, rodents and primates, however, have suggested an origin in suids, but have not included genera of the Chabertiinae as potential outgroups 1, 7. Thus, the phylogenetic relationships of species within the Chabertiinae and Oesophagostominae are not yet fully resolved. Using DNA sequence data, Chilton and co-workers [11] established that the two subfamilies were sister taxa and were related to the Phascolostrongylinae and Cloacininae, both occurring in Australian marsupials.

Recent studies have demonstrated that the sequence of the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS-2) of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) allows the unequivocal identification of a range of strongyloid nematode species, irrespective of developmental stage (e.g. 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21), and that phylogenetic relationships can be inferred from ITS-2 sequence data sets [11]. The aims of the present study were to characterise some members of the Chabertiidae by their ITS-2 rDNA sequence, to assess the extent of intraspecific variation and interspecific differences in the sequence, and to infer the phylogenetic relationship of Chabertia ovina with respect to members of the Oesophagostominae using ITS-2 sequence data.

Section snippets

Parasite material

Seven species of parasitic nematode belonging to the Chabertiidae (comprising the Chabertiinae and Oesophagostominae) were used for this study (Table 1). The nematode samples represented different life-cycle stages and originated from a variety of hosts from different geographical locations (Table 1). Adult worms were removed from the large intestine at necropsy, washed repeatedly in physiological saline and frozen at −70°C until required for DNA isolation. For some species, monospecific

Intraspecific variation

No intraspecific variation was detected between the two Australian isolates of Oesophagostomum radiatum (Oer2 and Oer5), despite their different life-cycle stages. Three Danish isolates of Oesophagostomum dentatum, representing two pools of third-stage larvae (Oed11 and Oed13) and an adult worm (Oed17), all had the same ITS-2 sequence, with one polymorphic site (see Fig. 2

. Alignment of the second internal transcribed spacer rDNA sequences of seven species of the family Chabertiidae with that of

Discussion

The ITS-2 sequence data have defined accurate genetic markers for the identification of species within the Chabertiidae. Given that the level of intraspecific variation in the ITS-2 sequence is low and that there is currently no evidence for significant variation among different developmental stages (eggs, larvae and adults) of a species (e.g. 13, 14, 16), these markers are of significance for the development of PCR-based diagnostic systems for the identification of nematode eggs in faecal

Acknowledgements

Project support was provided by the Australian Research Council, the Department of Industry, Science and Tourism and the Collaborative Research Program of the University of Melbourne (R.G.). Neil Chilton is the recipient of an ARC Australian Research Fellowship. Lisa Newton was the recipient of postgraduate scholarship from the Department of Veterinary Science (The University of Melbourne) and a J.D. Smyth Travel Award from the Australian Society for Parasitology. The authors are very grateful

References (34)

  • M-C Durette-Desset

    Adv Parasitol

    (1985)
  • M-C Durette-Desset et al.

    Int J Parasitol

    (1994)
  • NB Chilton et al.

    Int J Parasitol

    (1997)
  • AJD Campbell et al.

    Int J Parasitol

    (1995)
  • NB Chilton et al.

    Int J Parasitol

    (1995)
  • LA Stevenson et al.

    Int J Parasitol

    (1995)
  • G-C Hung et al.

    Int J Parasitol

    (1996)
  • LA Stevenson et al.

    Int J Parasitol

    (1996)
  • G-C Hung et al.

    Int J Parasitol

    (1997)
  • LA Newton et al.

    Mol Cell Probes

    (1997)
  • A Romstad et al.

    Mol Cell Probes

    (1997)
  • H Hoste et al.

    Int J Parasitol

    (1995)
  • NB Chilton et al.

    Int J Parasitol

    (1998)
  • K Rohde et al.

    Int J Parasitol

    (1994)
  • J Bowles et al.

    Mol Phylogenet Evol

    (1995)
  • CL Goggin

    Mol Biochem Parasitol

    (1994)
  • JR Lichtenfels

    Nematode parasites of mammals. Am Zool

    (1979)
  • Cited by (42)

    • Ashworthius sidemi Schulz, 1933 and Haemonchus contortus (Rudolphi, 1803) in cervids in France: integrative approach for species identification

      2016, Infection, Genetics and Evolution
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since several years, the parasite identification is increasingly based on an integrative approach combining morphological and molecular confirmation. Nuclear domains such as internal transcribed spacer (ITS) are still very often used for taxonomic identification of many organisms (Arias et al., 1999; Campbell et al., 1995; Chilton et al., 1995, 1997; Gasser et al., 1993, 1998; Gottschling et al., 2005; Hoste et al., 1995; Hung et al., 1996; Newton et al., 1998; Patrelle et al., 2014), such as between H. contortus and H. placei (Stevenson et al., 1995). However, since mitochondrial sequences accumulate much more substitutions than ITS, evolve quickly in nematodes, and reach reciprocal monophyly, the difference between the most closely related species is easier (Blouin, 1998, 2002; Blouin et al., 1997; Denver et al., 2000; Hoberg et al., 1999).

    • Alimentary System

      2016, Jubb, Kennedy and Palmer's Pathology of Domestic Animals: Sixth Edition
    • Identification of Chabertiidae (Nematoda, Strongylida) by PCR-RFLP based method: A new diagnostic tool for cross transmission investigation between domestic and wild ruminants in France

      2014, Infection, Genetics and Evolution
      Citation Excerpt :

      Concerning O. venulosum and C. ovina specimens, identification was easier since all our samples corresponded to morphological descriptions and all sequences were homologous with sequence from GenBank. Diverse studies have demonstrated that the internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS1 and ITS2) of ribosomal DNA provide reliable genetic markers for a specific identification of a number of parasite groups as rDNA maintains sequence homogeneity within a species (Andree et al., 1999; Campbell et al., 1995; Elbadri et al., 2002; Ellis et al., 1986; Newton et al., 1998; Wu et al., 2005). Here, our study confirms the relevance for this region ITS2 for an accurate taxonomic classification.

    • Unexpected occurrence of Haemonchus placei in cattle in southern Western Australia

      2014, Infection, Genetics and Evolution
      Citation Excerpt :

      KF364623–KF364632). These ten sequence types were aligned over 243 positions with ITS-2 reference sequences for H. contortus (n = 13) and H. placei (n = 5) (Stevenson et al., 1995; Cerutti et al., 2010; Brasil et al., 2012; Gharamah et al., 2012) and for Bunostomum phlebotomum, Nematodirus rupicaprae, Oesophagostomum columbianum and Trichostrongylus axei (‘outgroups’) (n = 4) (Hoste et al., 1995; Newton et al., 1998; Gasser et al., 1999; Jex et al., 2009) and subjected to phylogenetic analyses. The analyses unequivocally identified H. placei and H. contortus with strong nodal support (posterior probability values: 0.8–1.00%; bootstrap values: 80–98%) (Fig. 2).

    • The complete mitochondrial genomes of Oesophagostomum asperum and Oesophagostomum columbianum in small ruminants

      2013, Infection, Genetics and Evolution
      Citation Excerpt :

      quadrispinulatum, and O. asperum were grouped with C. ovina in a sister clade. These results were similar to phylogenetic trees based on nuclear ITS-2 and 28S rDNA sequences (Newton et al., 1998; Dorris et al., 1999; Gouÿ de Bellocq et al., 2001). All these findings indicated complex phylogenetic relationships of Oesophagostomum spp. in sheep and goats.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    fn1

    Note: Nucleotide sequence data reported in this paper are available in the embl, GenBankTM and DDJB databases under the accession numbers Y10790, Y11735, Y11736, Y11733, Y10789, AJ006149 and AJ006150.

    fn2

    Present address: Macfarlane Burnet Centre for Medical Research, Po Box 254, Fairfield, Victoria 3078, Australia.

    View full text