Biochemical aspects of egg hatch in endo- and ectoparasites: potential for rational drug design
Introduction
The sheep blowfly is responsible for significant economic loss to both wool and meat producers in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. Over the years a number of control measures have been put in place which rely primarily on the use of insecticides to kill larvae in combination with management practices designed to make sheep less attractive to the blowfly[1]. While in the immediate future the strategic use of insecticides will continue to play an important role in sheep blowfly control, alternative approaches must be investigated in order to discover new generation products. Control through vaccination against the early stage larvae is currently under investigation2, 3. However, intervention in the lifecycle prior to larval infestation would result in zero or minimal damage to the host.
Flystrike infections are initiated when eggs are laid on the skin or in the wool of sheep. The eggs then mature over several hours as the embryo develops until the first stage larvae emerge. During this period the eggs are accessible to agents which may be able to disrupt the normal physiological processes which lead to egg hatch. The biochemical events involved in egg hatch of ectoparasites have not been extensively studied. In contrast, biochemical processes have been shown to be important in the hatching of a number of endoparasites. This review will therefore focus on the physical and biochemical mechanisms involved in egg hatch of both endoparasites and ectoparasites with particular reference to the sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina.
Section snippets
Mechanisms of hatching in endoparasitic helminths
The hatching of parasite eggs represents a critical phase in a parasite's lifecycle. The process of egg hatching has therefore been studied in considerable detail particularly as it relates to endoparasites. In general, the hatching process is initiated by an appropriate signal which may be provided by the host or environment. These environmental signals may stimulate the embryo to secrete compounds, for example enzymes, which then degrade the egg shell or cyst and thus facilitate hatch. The
Mechanisms of egg hatching in arthropod ectoparasites
In contrast to the hatching of endoparasite eggs, as described by Sikes and Wigglesworth[18]the mechanism of ectoparasite egg hatch has not been intensively studied apart from visual descriptions of the hatching process. These descriptions focus almost exclusively on the physical aspects of egg hatch and have in general not addressed the possibility that ES products may be important in this process.
The hatching of ectoparasites is believed to result from a combination of physical and
Control of egg hatch through rational drug design
The involvement of proteases in the egg hatch of L. cuprina provides the opportunity to investigate novel means for controlling the egg hatch process. Further characterisation of these proteases in terms of their tertiary structure may enable the design of specific inhibitors in order to block the egg hatch process. The use of specific protease inhibitors which are non-toxic to the host, but which display specificity for the target protease represents a novel approach to chemo therapy. Such an
References (42)
- et al.
Control of blowfly strike in sheep: current strategies and future prospects
Int J Parasitol
(1997) - et al.
Lucilia cuprina: inhibition of larval growth induced by immunization of host sheep with extracts of larval peritrophic membrane
Int J Parasitol
(1993) - et al.
Vaccination of sheep against larvae of the sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina
Vaccine
(1996) - et al.
The nature and action of host signals
Adv Parasit
(1987) - et al.
The mechanism of hatching of eggs of Haemonchus contortus
Int J Parasitol
(1977) - et al.
Characterization of the eggshell of Haemonchus contortus. I. Structural components
Comp Biochem Physiol
(1992) Hatching of the eggs of Moniliformis dubius
Exp Parasitol
(1966)- et al.
Characterisation of ES products involved in wound initiation by Lucilia cuprina larvae
Int J Parasitol
(1996) - et al.
Proteases released by Lucilia cuprina during egg hatch
Insect Biochem Mol Biol
(1997) - et al.
Tryptic and chymotryptic proteases released by larvae of the blowfly Lucilia cuprina
Int J Parasitol
(1990)
Plasmodium falciparum, P. vivax, and P. malariea: a comparison of the active site properties of plasmepsins cloned and expressed from three different species of the malaria parasite
Exp Parasitol
Physiology of the hatching of eggs of Ascaris lumbricoides
Nature
Studies on the induction of permeability in Ascaris lumbricoides eggs
Parasitology
Proteinase activity in Ascaris suum eggs, hatching fluid, and excretions–secretions
J Parasitol
Chitinolytic activities in Heligmosomoides polygyrus and their role in egg hatching
Mol Biochem Parasitol
Hymenolepis diminuta: the mechanism of egg hatching
Parasitology
Leucine aminopeptidase and hatching of Schistosoma mansoni eggs
J Parasitol
Presence of proteolytic enzymes in Dicrocoelium dendriticum eggs
Int J Parasitol
Excystment of Paragonimus westermani metacercariae by endogenous cysteine protease
J Parasitol
The physiology of excystment of the metacercaria of Fasciola hepatica L
Parasitology
Cited by (15)
In vitro anthelmintic evaluation of three alkaloids against gastrointestinal nematodes of goats
2021, Veterinary ParasitologyCitation Excerpt :The hatching process of nematode eggs can occur as a result of enzymatic events (Mansfield et al., 1992). According to Young et al. (1999), the egg hatch is initiated by an environmental signal, which stimulates the embryo to secrete enzymes responsible for degrading the egg membrane. The ovicidal action observed for piperine is likely to be related to the inhibition of these enzymes, which would account for the occurrence of anthelmintic activity only in the egg phase and not in the infective larvae stage.
Cooperative inflammation: The recruitment of inflammatory signaling in marsupial and eutherian pregnancy
2020, Journal of Reproductive ImmunologyCitation Excerpt :This protease could have induced inflammation through endometrial tissue damage, or by triggering pattern recognition. The hatching of eukaryotic parasite eggs also involves serine protease secretion (Young et al., 1999), and as a consequence the mammalian innate immune system has evolved to recognize protease as a conserved pattern indicating helminth presence and induce an anti-helminthic Th2 immune response (Sokol et al., 2007). However, the anti-helminthic response is a type 2 immune response, whereas the inflammation induced after shell coat hatching in the opossum (Chavan et al., 2017) or during implantation in the human (Mor and Cardenas, 2010) is type 1.
The Battle Against Flystrike – Past Research and New Prospects Through Genomics
2017, Advances in ParasitologyCitation Excerpt :Therefore, insecticides have been, and continue to be, heavily relied on to prevent and control flystrike, but this reliance is becoming increasingly problematic due to insecticide resistance and residue problems in sheep fleece (Levot, 1995; Shaw, 1997; Sandeman et al., 2014b). A number of new insecticides have been proposed, including inhibitors of aminopeptidases (Reed et al., 1999), enzymes involved in egg hatching (Young et al., 1999) and histone deacetylase enzymes (Kotze et al., 2015). In addition to the development of new insecticides, a number of control methods that supplement and augment existing chemical treatments have been developed.
A blow to the fly — Lucilia cuprina draft genome and transcriptome to support advances in biology and biotechnology
2016, Biotechnology AdvancesCitation Excerpt :Therefore, insecticides have been heavily relied upon to treat or prevent flystrike, but this reliance is becoming increasingly problematic due to the extensive insecticide resistance and residue problems in sheep fleece (Levot, 1995; Shaw, 1997; Sandeman et al., 2014). A number of new insecticides have been proposed, including inhibitors of aminopeptidases (Reed et al., 1999), enzymes involved in egg hatching (Young et al., 1999) and of histone deacetylases (Kotze et al., 2015). Although extensive research has attempted to develop alternative approaches for the protection of sheep against myiasis and/or the control of L. cuprina populations, including biological, immunological and genetic control measures, as well as integrated pest management (reviewed by Sandeman et al., 2014), a sustainable method of control is not yet available.
Control of the sheep blowfly in Australia and New Zealand - are we there yet?
2014, International Journal for ParasitologyCitation Excerpt :Most drug discovery research remains confidential until late stage development but several potential targets for new flystrike chemicals have been suggested. For example, Reed et al. (1999) suggested that inhibitors of aminopeptidases could be used to interfere with larval digestion and Young et al. (1999) saw potential in developing inhibitors of key enzymes involved in blowfly egg hatching. Most recently, research into ligand binding at the ecdysone receptors of several insect pests, including the sheep blowfly, has led to the development of a new class of chemicals, the methylene lactams (Hill et al., 2012).
De novo whole transcriptome analysis of the fish louse, Argulus siamensis: First molecular insights into characterization of Toll downstream signalling molecules of crustaceans
2013, Experimental ParasitologyCitation Excerpt :Proteases components of secretory and excretory material like serine proteases and metalloproteases that have been characterized for antigenic properties in a number of ectoparasites were identified in the transcriptome. Few workers have analysed the role of secreted proteases like serine proteases in egg hatching process of arthropods (Young et al., 1999). Targeting such proteases, protease inhibitors have been used in parasite models like Schistosoma sp. and Plasmodium spp. (Ring et al., 1993).