Elsevier

Nuclear Physics

Volume 81, Issue 2, June 1966, Pages 1-58, IN1-IN3, 59-60
Nuclear Physics

Nuclear masses and deformations

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5582(66)80001-9Get rights and content

Abstract

A semi-empirical theory of nuclear masses and deformations is presented. The potential energy of a nucleus, considered as a function of N, Z and the nuclear shape, is assumed to be given by the liquid-drop model, modified by a shell correction. The shell correction is a simple function of N and Z and is supposed to disappear as the nucleus is distorted away from the spherical shape. The resulting semi-empirical expression for the nuclear deformation energy has seven adjustable parameters, four in the liquid-drop part and three in the shell correction. By making the deformation energy stationary with respect to distortions, the equilibrium deformations (i.e., the quadrupole moments) and the ground-state masses of nuclei are derived as functions of N and Z. In addition, from unstable shapes of equilibrium corresponding to saddle-point configurations, barrier energies for nuclear fission are deduced. The predictions of the theory are compared with some 1200 experimental nuclear masses, 240 quadrupole moments and 40 fission barriers. The results lead, on the one hand, to a re-assessment of the accuracy of the liquid-drop model and a firmer determination of its characteristic constants and, on the other, to a semi-quantitative understanding of the effects of shell structure on nuclear masses and deformations. A number of minor anomalies are isolated, one apparently related to the so-called Wigner term in the binding energy and one relevant for the understanding of fission barriers. Applications to the analysis of the centrifugal stretching of nuclei and to the possible existence of “islands of stability” in the region of super-heavy nuclei are mentioned.

References (42)

  • M. Baranger et al.

    Nuclear Physics

    (1965)
    S. Das Gupta et al.

    Nuclear Physics

    (1963)
  • B.R. Mottelson et al.

    Mat. Fys. Skr. Dan. Vid. Selsk.

    (1959)
    D.R. Bès

    Mat. Fys. Skr. Dan. Vid. Selsk.

    (1961)
    D.R. Bès et al.

    Nuclear Physics

    (1961)
  • H. Kümmel et al.
  • S.G. Nilsson

    Mat. Fys. Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk.

    (1955)
  • D.L. Hill et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1953)
  • W.J. Swiatecki
  • J.H.E. Mattauch et al.

    Nuclear Physics

    (1965)
  • W.D. Myers et al.

    Lawrence Radiation Laboratory Report UCRL-11980

    (May 27, 1965)
  • J.R. Huizenga et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1962)
  • A.E.S. Green
  • E. Marshalek et al.

    University of California Lawrence Radiation Laboratory Report UCRL-10364

    (July 1962)
  • F.S. Mozer

    Phys. Rev.

    (1959)
  • S. Cohen et al.

    Ann. of Phys.

    (1963)
  • H. Lamb

    Hydrodynamics

    (1945)
    P. AppellR.A. Lyttelton

    The stability of rotating liquid masses

    (1953)
    S. Cohen et al.

    Ann. of Phys.

    (1962)
  • W.J. Swiatecki

    Phys. Rev.

    (1956)
    W.J. Swiatecki
  • V.F. Weisskopf

    Revs. Mod. Phys.

    (1957)
  • A.H. Wapstra
  • V.G. Nossoff
  • B.C. Carlson

    J. Math. Phys.

    (1961)
  • W.J. Swiatecki
  • D.S. Burnett

    Phys. Rev.

    (1964)
  • Cited by (0)

    This work was done largely under the auspices of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission; one of the authors (W.D.M.) also wishes to acknowledge the National Science Foundation for support during part of this research.

    View full text