Wave pressures and uplift forces on and scour around submarine pipeline in clayey soil
Introduction
The search for oil under the deep-seabed has led into extensive theoretical and experimental investigations in the field of offshore oil exploration and exploitation. The discovery of large deposits of oil and gas in many deep-water offshore regions has resulted in the construction of large production and drilling platforms. Since the 1940s, the tendency to build the fixed offshore structures in deep waters has progressed steadily. Once the production platforms are erected in the sea, the next immediate task is to transport the oil and natural gas from the production site to onshore terminal facilities. Submarine pipeline offers an efficient mode of transportation of oil and gas continuously from offshore to onshore.
Though the pipeline appears as a simple structure, interaction of submarine pipeline with waves is a complex phenomenon. Many foundations of water front structures built on sandy soils have suffered extensive damage due to scour. Even the foundations built in clayey soil beds are not free from scour effects. There are many thick under-consolidated marine clayey deposits located in several coastal areas and the scouring of foundations in such soft cohesive sediments can be quite significant. Scour under the pipeline results in spanning and vibration and vortex induced loading. If the natural frequency of the pipe is closer to the frequency of waves, then the pipeline vibration magnifies, which results in failures of submarine pipelines. The review of existing literature reveals that studies on wave-induced pressure, uplift force on submarine pipeline especially in cohesive soils is in the developing stage as compared to the studies in sandy soils. Therefore, the present study has been carried out to investigate the magnitude of wave-induced pressure, uplift force on and scour around submarine pipeline in soft marine clayey soil. One of the important questions for selection of burial of a submarine pipeline is ‘WHAT IS THE OPTIMUM DEPTH OF BURIAL FOR ACHIEVING SUFFICIENT STABILITY AGAINST FLOATATION?’ This question can be solved, if the uplift force for different depths of burial in cohesive soil is known. Theoretical estimation of the uplift force in cohesive soil is cumbersome. For such situations, experimental investigation is the only option available. This is one of the main motivations for the present study. The effect of consistency index on uplift forces and wave pressures are also not known clearly and this aspect is also considered in the present investigation.
Section snippets
Literature review
In the last few decades, greater attention is being focused by many researchers in the field of hydrodynamics to understand the physics of the unsteady fluid flow phenomenon around the submerged pipelines. Knowledge about hydrodynamic aspects of submarine pipelines placed near the seabed boundary (both above and below the seabed) and subjected to the action of regular and random waves is increasing. Garrison et al. (1975) have conducted experiments to predict the wave forces on a horizontal
Test facility
The present experimental investigations are carried out in a 30 m long, 2.0 m wide and 1.7 m deep wave flume in the Department of Ocean Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India. The piston type wave maker is used for generation of regular and random waves. The wave height and period to be generated are controlled by a personal computer. The other end of the flume is provided with a rubble mound absorber to effectively absorb the incident waves. The details of the
General
Both for regular and random waves, the peak pressures and maximum uplift forces were obtained by using threshold crossing analysis. DHI wave synthesiser software package was used to perform the time domain analyses. The wave pressures and forces are normalised by using appropriate input parameters. The discussion is provided for both regular and random wave studies in the following sections.
Effect of relative water depth, d/L on the wave pressure
In the field, the pipeline has to cross-different water depths, wave height and periods. It is essential
Conclusions
A comprehensive investigation on the wave induced pressures and uplift forces by regular and random waves on a pipeline resting on the seabed as well as buried at different relative burial depths were carried out using physical model studies. The present experimental results are compared with the experimental and theoretical results from exiting literature. The important conclusions arrived from this study are:
- 1.
Normalised wave induced pressures on the submarine pipeline decreased by about
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to express their gratitude to the Head, Department of Ocean Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, for providing the necessary facilities for carrying out this work. Thanks to the appropriate authorities of IIT Madras for necessary infrastructure for carrying out this study.
References (17)
Wave-induced uplift force on a submarine pipeline buried in a compressible seabed
Ocean Engineering
(1997)- et al.
Erosion of mud/sand mixtures
Coastal Engineering
(1996) Wave-induced pore pressures around submarine pipeline
Coastal Engineering
(1986)- et al.
Seepage force on a pipeline buried in a poroelastic seabed under wave loading
Applied Ocean Research
(1986) - et al.
Effective stress response of a plane seabed under wave loading
Geotechnique
(1988) - et al.
Wave forces on bottom mounted large diameter cylinder
Journal of Waterways, Harbours and Coastal Engineering, ASCE
(1975) - et al.
Wave forces on large offshore pipelines
Ocean Engineering
(1985)
Cited by (32)
Experimental study of soil responses around a pipeline in a sandy seabed under wave-current load
2023, Applied Ocean ResearchEffect of pipeline-seabed gaps on the vertical forces of a pipeline induced by submarine slide impact
2021, Ocean EngineeringCitation Excerpt :Offshore pipelines often cross through undulating seabeds (e.g. submarine escarpments, canyons), causing suspension of some pipeline sections (Jeanjean et al., 2005; Xiu et al., 2016). Moreover, due to the complex pipeline-soil-water interactions, initially ‘on bottom’ seafloor pipelines may be suspended at different distances above the seabed (Vijaya kumar et al., 2003; Cathie et al., 2005) due to scour of the underlying soil. Despite this, the influence of the suspended distance between the pipeline and seabed (termed gap henceforth) on the slide-pipeline interaction forces is rarely considered.