OWC wave energy devices with air flow control
Introduction
The oscillating-water-column (OWC) wave energy device is probably the most extensively studied type of wave power plant and one of the few to have reached the stage of full-sized prototype. The device consists essentially of a floating or (more usually) bottom-fixed structure, whose upper part forms an air chamber and whose immersed part is open to the action of the sea. The reciprocating flow of air displaced by the inside free surface motion drives an air turbine mounted on the top of the structure. A system of non-return valves may be used to rectify the flow in order to allow a conventional turbine to be used, as proposed by Moody and Elliot (1982). Alternatively the plant may be equipped with a self-rectifying turbine, which eliminates the need for the rectifying valve system. Several versions of self-rectifying air turbines for wave energy conversion have been proposed and studied, namely McCormick's counter-rotating turbine (Richards and Weiskopf, 1986; McCormick and Surko, 1989), the impulse turbine with self-pitch-controlled guide vanes (Setoguchi et al., 1991) and the Wells turbine (Raghunathan et al., 1985; Gato and Falcão, 1988; Raghunathan, 1995). The latter was adopted in most OWC wave pilot plants built so far, namely in Norway (Falnes, 1992), Japan (Ohno et al., 1993), India (Koola et al., 1993), UK (Whittaker et al., 1993) and Portugal (Falcão, 1998).
A general feature of turbomachines lies in their efficiency being strongly dependant on flow rate. Large drops in efficiency at far-from-design conditions are known to arise from flow separation when the angle of incidence of the flow approaching the rotating and/or stationary blades or vanes becomes excessive. One way of reducing the sensitivity of the efficiency to flow changes (at the expense of higher mechanical complexity and cost) is to employ variable geometry machines, as is the case of Kaplan water turbines and variable pitch propellers and wind turbines. Wind turbines, as well as turbomachines equipping wave energy devices, are especially subject to large variations in flow conditions. Variations associated with changes in wind or wave average conditions with time scales much larger than the response time of the machine itself can be matched by adjusting adequately the rotational speed as far as this is allowed for by the coupling to the electric generator. The inertia of the turbo-generator rotating elements makes it unfeasible to adjust the machine speed to faster oscillations of flow (those whose time scales are less than, say, 1 min); especially for turbomachines of fixed geometry, such flow oscillations may severely reduce their efficiency.
The efficiency of oscillating water column (OWC) wave energy devices equipped with Wells turbines is particularly affected by flow oscillations basically for two reasons. First, because of the intrinsically unsteady (reciprocating) flow of air displaced by the oscillating water free surface. Second, because increasing the air flow rate, above a limit depending on, and approximately proportional to, the rotational speed of the turbine, is known to give rise to a rapid drop in the aerodynamic efficiency and in the power output of the turbine. A method which has been proposed to partially circumvent this problem consists in controlling the pitch of the turbine rotor blades in order to prevent the instantaneous angle of incidence of the relative flow from exceeding the critical value above which severe stalling occurs at the rotor blades (see Gato and Falcão, 1991). Although considered technically feasible (Salter, 1993) this has never been implemented at full scale owing to mechanical difficulties.
Alternately, the flow rate through the turbine can be prevented from becoming excessive by equipping the device with air valves. Two different schemes can be envisaged. In the first one the valves are mounted between the chamber and the atmosphere in parallel with the turbine (by-pass or relief valves, on or near the roof of the air chamber structure) and are made to open (by active or passive control) in order to prevent the overpressure (or the underpressure) in the chamber to exceed a limit which is defined by the aerodynamic characteristics of the turbine at its instantaneous speed. In the second scheme a valve is mounted in series with the turbine in the duct connecting the chamber and the atmosphere. Excessive flow rate is prevented by partially closing the valve. In both schemes, the air flow through the turbine is controlled at the expense of energy dissipation at the valves. Theoretically the two methods, if properly implemented, are equivalent from the point of view of limiting the flow rate through the turbine. However, the resulting pressure changes in the chamber are different (reduction and increase in pressure oscillations in the first and second cases, respectively). Consequently the hydrodynamic process of energy extraction from the waves is differently modified by valve operation in the two control methods.
The main purpose of this work is to analyze theoretically the performance of an OWC wave energy device when valves are used to limit the flow through the turbine. Both schemes are considered and compared: a valve (or a set of valves) mounted in parallel with the turbine (by-pass or relief valve) or a valve mounted in the turbine duct. The hydrodynamic analysis is done in the time domain for regular as well as for irregular waves. The spring-like effect due to the compressibility of the air is taken into account and is discussed in some detail. Realistic characteristics are assumed for the turbine. Numerical results are presented for a simple two-dimensional chamber geometry for whose hydrodynamic coefficients analytical expressions are known as functions of wave frequency.
Section snippets
Governing equations
We consider an OWC wave energy device, fixed with respect to the sea bottom (Fig. 1). The geometry of the device and of the surrounding submerged solid boundaries is arbitrary, and the waves incident upon the device are supposed in general to be irregular.
Let pa+p(t) (pa=atmospheric pressure) be the pressure (assumed uniform) of the air inside the chamber, q(t) the volume flow rate displaced by the motion of the inside free-surface of water, and m(t) the mass of air contained inside the
Theoretical simulation
The benefits from using by-pass or throttle valves to limit the air flow rate through the turbine in an OWC wave power device will be illustrated by numerically simulating the performance of a power plant. A simple, two-dimensional geometry will be adopted for the submerged solid boundaries of the system, in order to be able to use known analytical results for the hydrodynamic coefficient of radiation B(ω). We assume unidirectional waves to propagate in water of constant depth h towards the OWC
Numerical results
We chose the geometry of the chamber to be approximately that of the chamber of the European pilot plant built on the island of Pico, Azores (Falcão, 1998), which has a square planform of dimensions 12×12 m2. The volume of the chamber above the still water surface is V0=1050 m3, and the water depth is h=8 m.
Atmospheric conditions are taken to be pa=1.013×105 Pa, ρa=1.2 kg m−3, and the density of water is ρw=1.025×103 kg m−3. The thermodynamic properties of air are γ=1.4, cp=1004.5 J kg K−1.
Turbine
Conclusions
A theoretical model was developed to simulate the energy conversion, from wave to turbine shaft, of an OWC plant equipped with a Wells turbine. The model realistically allows for changes in entropy of air in the chamber, due to viscous losses, to be accounted for. The use of a valve or a set of valves to control the flow through the turbine (and in this way prevent or reduce the aerodynamic stall losses at the turbine rotor blades) was found to provide a way of substantially increasing the
Acknowledgements
The work reported here was partly supported by the European Commission under contract nos JOU2-CT93-0314 and JOR3-CT95-0012, and by IDMEC, Lisbon. The second author is indebted to Program PRAXIS XXI for a research grant.
References (25)
- et al.
Aerodynamics of the Wells turbine
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
(1988) The Wells air turbine for wave energy conversion
Progress in Aerospace Sciences
(1995)- Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I.A., 1965. Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover, New...
- Brito-Melo, A., Sarmento, A.J.N.A., Gato, L.M.C., 1995. Mathematical extrapolation of tank testing results: application...
- Dixon, S.L., 1978. Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery, 3rd ed. Pergamon,...
Wave power absorption by systems of oscillating surface pressure distributions
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
(1982)- Falcão, A.F. de O., 1998. Design and construction of the Pico OWC wave power plant. In: Dursthoff, W., Diamantaras, K....
- Falnes, J., 1992. Review of wave energy research in Norway. In: Caratti, G., Lewis, A.T., Howett, D. (Eds.),...
- et al.
Performance of the Wells turbine with variable pitch rotor blades
ASME Journal of Energy Resources Technology
(1991) - et al.
Performance of a high-solidity Wells turbine for an OWC wave power plant
Transactions of ASME Journal of Energy Resources Technology
(1996)
Cited by (292)
Assessment of heat and entropy balance of an OWC wave energy converter
2024, Journal of Cleaner ProductionTheoretical approach to the scale effects of an OWC device
2023, Renewable EnergyA large-scale review of wave and tidal energy research over the last 20 years
2023, Ocean Engineering