Responses of Agricultural Crops to Free-Air CO2 Enrichment
Introduction
The increasing CO2 concentration of Earth's atmosphere and associated predictions of global warming (IPCC, 1996) have stimulated research programs to determine the likely effects of the future elevated CO2 levels on agricultural productivity and on the functioning of natural ecosystems (e.g., Dahlman et al., 1985). However, even predating the global change concerns, the effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment have been studied for more than a century in greenhouses, controlled-environment chambers, open-top chambers, and other enclosures to confine the CO2 gas around the experimental plants (e.g., Drake et al., 1985; Enoch and Kimball, 1986; Schulze and Mooney, 1993). The results of these many chamber-based experiments have been reviewed by Kimball (1983, 1986, 1993), Morison (1985), Cure (1985), Cure and Acock (1986), Kimball and Idso (1983), Poorter (1993), Idso and Idso (1994), Ceulemans and Mousseau (1994), Wullschleger et al. (1997), Cotrufo et al. (1998), Norby et al. (1999), Nakagawa and Horie (2000), Curtis and Wang (1998), and Wand et al. (1999) (although the latter two also included a few observations from recent nonchamber open-field experiments).
However, the environment inside enclosures is not generally like that outside (e.g., Kimball et al., 1997; McLeod and Long, 1999); thus, there have been many concerns that the results from such enclosure-based CO2-enrichment experiments might not be representative of future open fields and forests. Therefore, various attempts were made to develop techniques which could maintain the CO2 concentrations over open-field plots at elevated levels despite the challenges imposed by open-field winds causing rapid dispersal of the CO2 (Allen, 1992; Norby et al., 2001). Eventually, engineers from Brookhaven National Laboratory (Upton, New York) working cooperatively with scientists from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, and from Tuskegee University, as well as others, were able to adapt a “vertical vent pipe” technology that could adequately maintain the desired high levels of CO2 over open-field plots all growing-season long (Hendrey, 1993; Norby et al., 2001). The first such experiment with publishable biological data was conducted on cotton in 1989 at Maricopa, Arizona. After success with cotton, the Brookhaven group moved their engineering efforts to the forest, and they were able to increase the scale of the apparatus to accommodate 14-m-tall trees (e.g., Delucia et al., 1999). Once it was demonstrated that such free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments were feasible, several other research groups also initiated similar experiments in both managed and natural ecosystems. To date, there are about 30 active or planned FACE sites (http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/programs/FACE/face.html; http://www.face.bnl.gov/; http://gcte-focus1.org/co2.html).
The purposes of this paper are (i) to compile the available data from the FACE experiments on agricultural crops; (ii) to determine the relative responses of the several crops to elevated CO2 with regard to their physiology, growth, yield, water relations, and soil processes; (iii) to search for similarities and differences among species and plant functional types; and (iv) to compare these FACE results with those from prior chamber-based studies.
Section snippets
Methodology
We have extracted data from papers and manuscripts generated by our agricultural-crop-oriented free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) projects at Maricopa, Arizona; Shizukuishi, Iwate, Japan; and Rapolano, Terme, Italy, as well as from the grassland project at Eschikon, Switzerland. The experimental protocols and site characteristics for the several experiments are listed in Table I. From the absolute crop response values, we computed the relative increases (or decreases, which are listed as negative
Photosynthesis
It is well known that elevated CO2 stimulates photosynthesis. The main uncertainties regard the degrees of stimulation for each species and environmental condition. Also important is whether or not the plants acclimate to the higher CO2 by altering the biochemical makeup of the their photosynthetic apparatus so that the photosynthetic rate at high CO2 decreases to become closer to that at today's ambient CO2. The biochemical and molecular bases for such photosynthetic acclimation have been
Compendium and Conclusions
The quantitative relative changes due to elevated CO2 (550 or about 190 μmol mol−1 above ambient) in the several crop growth and other parameters as determined from the FACE experiments are summarized in Table III. Except as noted, the responses agree with prior chamber-based results. Obviously, the FACE experiments on agricultural crops during this past decade have produced a vast amount of information about the responses of several species to elevated CO2. The selected species were
Summary
Over the past decade, free-air CO2-enrichment (FACE) experiments have been conducted on several agricultural crops: wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne), and rice (Oryza sativa L.) which are C3 grasses; sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Möench), a C4 grass; white clover (Trifolium repens), a C3 legume; potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), a C3 forb with tuber storage; and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and grape (Vitis vinifera L.) which are C3 woody perennials. Using reports
Acknowledgments
The senior author greatly appreciates the Science and Technology Agency (STA) Fellowship (ID 300005), which enabled him to work on this paper at the National Institute of Agro-Environmental Science, Tsukuba, Japan, for 3 months. We also appreciate the cooperation of Drs. Josef Noesberger and Herbert Blum, Institute of Plant Sciences, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland, who furnished preprint copies of several papers with data from the Swiss FACE Project and provided helpful comments.
References (126)
- et al.
Maize root-derived soil organic carbon estimated by natural 13 C abundance
Soil Biol. Biochem.
(1992) - et al.
Leaf water relations of cotton in a free-air CO2-enriched environment
Agric. For. Meteorol.
(1994) - et al.
Free air CO2 enrichment (FACE) of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): I Development and testing of the system for CO2 enrichment
Eur. J. Agron.
(2001) - et al.
Free air CO2 enrichment (FACE) of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): II. Growth and grapes and wine quality in response to elevated CO2 concentration
Eur. J. Agron.
(2001) - et al.
Crop responses to carbon dioxide doubling: A literature survey
Agric. For. Meteorol.
(1986) - et al.
Sap flow measurements of transpiration from cotton grown under ambient and enriched CO2 concentrations
Agric. For. Meteorol.
(1994) - et al.
Influence of elevated CO2 and mild water stress on nonstructural carbohydrates in field-grown cotton tissues
Agric. For. Meteorol.
(1994) - et al.
Canopy photosynthesis and transpiration of field-grown cotton exposed to free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) and differential irrigation
Agric. For. Meteorol.
(1994) - et al.
Effects of elevated CO2 and water stress on mineral concentration of cotton
Agric. For. Meteorol.
(1994) - et al.
Cotton evapotranspiration under field conditions with CO2 enrichment and variable soil moisture regimes
Agric. For. Meteorol.
(1994)