Chapter 12 In Situ Hybridization

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-679X(08)61453-3Get rights and content

Publisher Summary

In situ hybridization is a cytochemical technique for localizing specific DNA or RNA sequences within an organism. Applications of in situ hybridization technology are diverse. The most common usage in plant cell biology is localization of a messenger RNA (mRNA) at the light microscopic level. This chapter focuses on in situ hybridization and its applications, such as localization of DNA elements on isolated chromosomes, localization of genes or transcripts at the subcellular level by electron microscopy, and in situ polymerase chain reaction (PCR). There are two major categories of labels and detection systems for in situ hybridization: isotopic and nonisotopic. Both have relative merits, depending on the system used. Isotopic labeling is familiar to most molecular biologists, and standard probe production techniques can be used. However, microautoradiography is an exacting procedure and not always easily mastered. Nonisotopic systems are safer, have potentially higher resolution and sensitivity, and produce probes with longevity. Three types of probes can be used for in situ hybridization: synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotides, double-stranded DNA probes, and single-stranded RNA probes. Each of these probe types has advantages and disadvantages.

References (32)

  • F.M. Ausubel et al.

    “Current Protocols in Molecular Biology.”

    (1988)
  • Boehringer Mannehim (1992). “Nonradioactive In situ Hybridization: Application Manual.” Boehringer Mannheim,...
  • R.G. Bonfiglioli et al.

    In situ hybridization localizes avocado sunblotch viroid on chloroplast thylakoid membranes and coconut cadang cadang viroid in the nucleus

    Plant J.

    (1994)
  • S. Brunning et al.

    Direct peroxidase labeling of hybridization probes and chemiluminescence detection

    “In situ Hybridization: A Guide to Radioactive and Non Radioactive in situ Hybridization Systems.”

    (1993)
  • K.H. Cox et al.

    Analysis of plant gene expression

  • M.R. Evans et al.

    32P, 33P, and 35S—Selecting a label for nucleic acid analysis

    Nature (London)

    (1992)
  • Cited by (32)

    • Mechanical force induced DNA double-strand breaks: Ultrasound

      2022, Enzymes
      Citation Excerpt :

      Currently, several methodologies can be used to detect DSBs both in vivo and in vitro [14–21], such as polymerase chain reaction, immunological assays, in situ hybridization, etc. Despite the availability of these methods, it is difficult to evaluate the number of double-strand breaks in a quantitative manner, especially for long genome-sized DNA molecules [22–24]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that the direct visualization of single giant DNA molecules using fluorescence microscopy can provide useful information on the structure and function of genomic DNA molecules in solution [25–28], and can be used to analyze DSBs in a quantitative manner.

    • Global optimization using Gaussian processes to estimate biological parameters from image data

      2019, Journal of Theoretical Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      An example of such data is ISH data. ISH is a technique in which a complementary strand to the nucleic acid of interest, with a reporter molecule attached, is applied to the tissue of interest (Hargrave et al., 2006; McFadden, 1995). Upon addition of a substrate, a chemical reaction catalysed by the reporter molecule takes place which reveals the location of a specific segment of nucleic acid, for instance DNA or RNA.

    • Protective effect of ascorbic acid against double-strand breaks in giant DNA: Marked differences among the damage induced by photo-irradiation, gamma-rays and ultrasound

      2015, Chemical Physics Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      Immunological assays are also commonly used for the detection of oxidative DNA damage through the use of an antibody or immunoglobulin [7,9]. In situ hybridization provides information on specific changes in certain DNA sequences [7,10]. A comet assay can detect double-strand breaks in DNA, although a quantitative evaluation is almost impossible [7,11].

    • Presence of prolactin mRNA in extra-pituitary brain areas in the domestic turkey

      2012, Acta Histochemica
      Citation Excerpt :

      No labeling on brain sections was observed with the sense cRNA probes (data not shown). The criteria used in the present study have been accepted as sufficient verification of the specificity for probes utilized for in situ hybridization (Young, 1990; Wilkinson, 1992; McFadden, 1995; Chesselet et al., 1996). Data were organized by coronal brain sections, which were taken from approximately 1.0 mm rostral to the optic chiasma to approximately 1.0 mm caudal to the median eminence and pituitary.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text