Abstract
Different types of random binary topological trees (like neuronal processes and rivers) occur with relative frequencies that can be explained in terms of growth models. It will be shown how the model parameter determining the mode of growth can be estimated with the maximum likelihood procedure from observed data. Monte Carlo simulations were used to study the distributional properties of this estimator which appeared to have a negligible bias. It is shown that the minimum chi-square procedure yields an estimate that is very close to the maximum likelihood estimate. Moreover, the goodness-of-fit of the growth model can be inferred directly from the chi-square statistic. To illustrate the procedures we examined axonal trees from the goldfish tectum. A notion of complete partition randomness is presented as an alternative to our growth hypotheses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berkson, J. 1980. “Minimum Chi-Square, Not Maximum Likelihood!”Ann. Statist. 12, 457–487.
Berry, M., P. McConnell and J. Sievers. 1980. “Dendritic Growth and the Control of Neuronal Form.” InCurrent Topics in Developmental Biology, R. K. Hunt (Ed.), Vol. 15, pp. 67–101. New York: Academic Press.
Buckland, S. T. 1984. “Monte Carlo Confidence Intervals.”Biometrics 40, 811–817.
Cochran, W. G. 1977.Sampling Techniques 3rd Edn. New York: J. Wiley.
Conover, W. J. 1980.Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 2nd Edn. New York: J. Wiley.
Cox, D. R. and D. V. Hinkley. 1974.Theoretical Statistics. London: Chapman and Hall.
Cramér, H. 1946.Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Diggle, P. J. 1983.Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns. London: Academic Press.
Easter, S. S., Jr. and C. A. O. Stuermer. 1984. “An Evaluation of the Hypothesis of Shifting Terminals in Goldfish Optic Tectum.”J. Neurosci. 4, 1052–1063.
Harding, E. F. 1971. “The Probabilities of Rooted Tree-shapes Generated by Random Bifurcation.”Adv. appl. Prob. 3, 44–77.
Lehmann, E. L. 1983.Theory of Point Estimation. New York: J. Wiley.
Stuermer, C. A. O. 1984. “Rules for Retinotectal Terminal Arborizations in the Goldfish Optic Tectum.”J. comp. Neurol. 229, 214–232.
Van Pelt, J. and R. W. H. Verwer. 1983. “The Exact Probabilities of Branching Patterns Under Terminal and Segmental Growth Hypotheses.”Bull. math. Biol. 45, 269–285.
— and —. 1985. “Growth Models (Including Terminal and Segmental Branching) for Topological Binary Trees.”Bull. math. Biol. 47, 323–336.
— and — 1986. “Topological Properties of Binary Trees Growth with Order-dependent Branching Probabilities.”Bull. math. Biol 48, 197–211.
—— and H. B. M. Uylings. 1986. “Application of Growth Models to the Topology of Neuronal Branching Patterns.”J. Neurosci. Meth. 18, 153–165.
Verwer, R. W. H., J. Van Pelt and H. B. M. Uylings. 1985. “A Simple Statistical Test for the Vertex Ratio Using Monte Carlo Simulation.”J. Neurosci. Meth. 14, 137–142.
— and —. 1986. “Descriptive and Comparative Analysis of Geometrical Properties of Neuronal Tree Structures.”J Neurosci. Meth. 18, 179–206.
Verwer, R. W. H. J. Van Pelt, and C. A. O. Stuermer. 1987. “Topological Analysis of Goldfish Retinotectal Axon Terminals.” (submitted).
Wilks, S. S. 1962.Mathematical Statistics. New York: J. Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verwer, R.W.H., Van Pelt, J. & Noest, A.J. Parameter estimation in topological analysis of binary tree structures. Bltn Mathcal Biology 49, 363–378 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02460126
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02460126