Comment

Under-use of the Ross operation—a lost opportunity

Half a century after the first pulmonary autograft operation (Ross operation), performed in 1967 by Donald Ross in central London, there is a very strong conviction that the Ross operation is the best available valve substitute today, not only for children, but also for younger and older adults. The Ross operation has stimulated a lot of science to do with tissue-engineering and biology of heart valves, which is a promising avenue for the future. For one of us (M.Y.), it has certainly been a privilege to be associated with the comeback of the Ross operation.

In the sixties, Dr Donald Ross designed a surgical solution for young patients with aortic valve disease by using the patients’ own pulmonary valve. The Ross procedure is the only aortic valve replacement technique that can restore long-term survival and preserve quality of life. The main failure mode of the Ross procedure is wall dilatation, potentially leading to valve regurgitation and leakage. Dilatation occurs due to the inability of the pulmonary autograft to adapt to the sudden increase in loading when exposing to aortic pressures. Previous experimental data has shown that a permanent external support wrapped around the artery can prevent the acute dilatation of the arterial wall. However, the textile support leads to stress-shielding phenomena due to the loss of mechanical wall compliance. We present a pragmatic and modular computational framework of arterial growth and remodeling predicting the long-term outcomes of cardiovascular tissue adaptation, with and without textile wrapping. The model integrates mean, systolic and diastolic pressures and assumes the resulting wall stresses to drive the biological remodeling rules. Rather than a single mean pressure or stress deviation from the homeostatic state, we demonstrate that only pulsatile stresses can predict available experimental results. Therefore, we suggest that a biodegradable external support could induce benign remodeling in the Ross procedure. Indeed, a biodegradable textile wrapped around the autograft fulfills the trade-off between prevention of acute dilatation on the one hand and recovery of arterial wall compliance on the other hand. After further validation, the computational framework can set the basis for the development of an actual biodegradable external support for the Ross procedure with optimized polymer mechanical properties and degradation behavior.

The Ross procedure is an excellent option for children or young adults who need aortic valve replacement because it can restore survival to that of the normal aged-matched population. However, autograft remodeling can lead to aneurysmal formation and reoperation, and the biomechanics of this process is unknown. This study investigated postoperative autograft remodeling after the Ross procedure by examining patient-specific autograft wall stresses.

Patients who have undergone the Ross procedure who had intraoperative pulmonary root and aortic specimens collected were recruited. Patient-specific models (n = 16) were developed using patient-specific material property and their corresponding geometry from cine magnetic resonance imaging at 1-year follow-up. Autograft ± Dacron for aneurysm repair and ascending aortic geometries were reconstructed to develop patient-specific finite element models, which incorporated material properties and wall thickness experimentally measured from biaxial stretching. A multiplicative approach was used to account for prestress geometry from in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Pressure loading to systemic pressure (120/80) was performed using LS-DYNA software (LSTC Inc, Livermore, Calif).

At systole, first principal stresses were 809 kPa (25%-75% interquartile range, 691-1219 kPa), 567 kPa (485-675 kPa), 637 kPa (555-755 kPa), and 382 kPa (334-413 kPa) at the autograft sinotubular junction, sinuses, annulus, and ascending aorta, respectively. Second principal stresses were 360 kPa (310-426 kPa), 355 kPa (320-394 kPa), 272 kPa (252-319 kPa), and 184 kPa (147-222 kPa) at the autograft sinotubular junction, sinuses, annulus, and ascending aorta, respectively. Mean autograft diameters were 29.9 ± 2.7 mm, 38.3 ± 5.3 mm, and 26.6 ± 4.0 mm at the sinotubular junction, sinuses, and annulus, respectively.

Peak first principal stresses were mainly located at the sinotubular junction, particularly when Dacron reinforcement was used. Patient-specific simulations lay the foundation for predicting autograft dilatation in the future after understanding biomechanical behavior during long-term follow-up.