Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity
Section snippets
Costs versus limits of plasticity
The benefit of plasticity is the ability to produce a better phenotype-environment match across more environments than would be possible by producing a single phenotype in all environments[17]. If constraints did not exist, organisms should exhibit `perfect' or `infinite' plasticity, expressing the best trait value in every environment with no cost for having that ability. Generally, plastic organisms fail this ideal because of an inability to consistently produce the optimum (i.e. a
Maintenance costs
Maintenance costs could be incurred by plastic organisms if facultative development requires the maintenance of sensory and regulatory machinery that fixed development does not require5, 11, 13, 18. For example, the ethylene growth response in plants requires the response of an ethylene receptor protein on the cell membranes of plants[19]. If development were insensitive to ethylene, the energetic and material cost of producing the receptor protein (i.e. the sensory machinery) could be saved.
Production costs
Information reliability limits
As noted earlier, producing a plastic response may require information about the environment. In addition to the cost of information acquisition, however, there can be problems associated with poor reliability of cues used to assess the environment11, 13, 14, 17, 23, 24, 33. Plastic organisms with unreliable information express poor phenotype-environment matching.
Lag-time limits
Temporary problems with poor phenotype-environment matching can also be generated by a lag-time between sensing and responding to
What are the odds of detecting costs?
Here we question three expectations that underlie the search for costs of plasticity: (1) the expectation that plasticity is necessarily costly, (2) the expectation that costly but nonadaptive plasticity should persist in nature, and (3) the expectation that plasticity will remain costly over evolutionary time.
First, whether we expect plasticity or constancy to be more costly depends on whether the focal trait exhibits plasticity as an `active' or `passive' (sensu Ref. [10]) response to
Measuring plasticity costs
Although plasticity is easily documented without quantifying genetic relationships among organisms (e.g. Refs [38]and [39]), the parameters needed to detect costs of plasticity require controlled quantitative genetic experimental designs5, 12. Generally, related groups of individuals (full or half sibships, clones, etc.) are raised in two or more environments to estimate components of phenotypic variation due to genetic affiliation, environment and genotype-environment interactions. Each
Future directions
Models have already demonstrated several ecological and evolutionary consequences of various constraints on plasticity. Modeling these constraints may continue to be useful, but without good empirical data it is difficult to know which constraints are most likely or what magnitude each assumes. For example, as costs are documented empirically, we will have data to use in existing models, so that predictions about particular empirical systems can be made. The first researchers to document costs
Acknowledgements
We thank Sam Scheiner, Massimo Pigliucci, Chris Grill and Carl Schlichting for valuable input. Preparation of this paper was supported by the US National Science Foundation (grant DEB-9618702 to T.J.D. and A.S.).
References (40)
Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(1995)Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment when a correlation may exist between the conditions at the time a choice has to be made and the subsequent outcomes
J. Theor. Biol.
(1967)- et al.
Phenotypic similarity and the evolutionary significance of countergradient variation
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(1995) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.
(1986)Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.
(1989)Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.
(1993)- et al.
Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity
Evolution
(1985) Evolution of generalists and specialists in spatially heterogeneous environments
Evolution
(1991)Adaptive plasticity in amphibian metamorphosis
BioScience
(1992)Phenotypic plasticity and the Neo-Darwinian legacy
Evol. Trends Plants
(1992)
Gene regulation, quantitative genetics and the evolution of reaction norms
Evol. Ecol.
How organisms respond to environmental changes: from phenotypes to molecules (and vice versa)
Trends Ecol. Evol.
Plasticity in fluctuating environments
Lect. Notes Biomath.
Phenotypic plasticity in Chrysoperla: genetic variation in the sensory mechanism and in correlated reproductive traits
Evolution
The evolutionary maintenance of alternative phenotypes
Am. Nat.
Canalization versus developmental conversion in a spatially variable environment
Am. Nat.
On the coexistence of specialists and generalists
Am. Nat.
The evolution of ecological specialization
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.
Cited by (1731)
Evolution and molecular mechanisms of wing plasticity in aphids
2024, Current Opinion in Insect ScienceEcology, culture and leadership: Theoretical integration and review
2024, Leadership QuarterlyBeyond reaction norms: the temporal dynamics of phenotypic plasticity
2024, Trends in Ecology and Evolution