Controversies in CRRT
Who should manage CRRT in the ICU? The intensivist's viewpoint

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6386(97)90552-7Get rights and content

Abstract

The arrival of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has given the intensivist and the intensive care nurse the opportunity to treat acute renal failure (ARF) independently by giving them the necessary technology and taking CRRT away from absolute nephrological control. This structural shift has created a controversy between those countries where control of CRRT has completely shifted to the intensivist and those countries where nephrological input is still dominant. The argument in favor of intensivist-driven CRRT rests upon several observations, including the fact that therapy is continuous, as is the presence of the intensivist in the intensive care unit (ICU). Critically ill patients require rapid changes in treatment that are best directed by physicians who are at the bedside all the time. CRRT must be seen within the totality of patient care, and the intensivist can see the larger picture more accurately. Intensivists are successfully performing more and more procedures that were previously seen as part of other specialties and, last but not least, “closed” models of ICU care appear to work best. Australian intensivists have taken up CRRT from the start and now control it. Patient outcomes under such a system, as reported here, are above average, and confirm the effectiveness of such an approach.

References (9)

  • R Bellomo et al.

    The nutritional management of acute renal failure in the critically ill patient

    Am J Kidney Dis

    (1996)
  • E Paganini

    Continuous renal replacement therapy: A nephrological technique, managed by the nephrologist

    Semin Dial

    (1996)
  • DJ Bihari

    Acute renal failure in the intensive care unit: The role of the specialist in intensive care

    Semin Dial

    (1996)
  • MA Kelley

    Critical care medicine—A new specialty

    N Engl J Med

    (1983)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (22)

  • Impact of trained intensivist coverage on survival outcomes after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A nationwide cohort study in South Korea

    2022, Resuscitation
    Citation Excerpt :

    A recent retrospective cohort study from a single institution reported that an intensivist-led multidisciplinary team was associated with improved outcomes in patients who received venovenous ECMO support for respiratory failure. Moreover, the application of ECMO and CRRT was usually recommended in a closed ICU model with trained intensivist coverage.15 Therefore, our results suggested that intervention by intensivists during ICU stay for patients who undergo ECMO or CRRT might lead to better survival outcomes after ICPR.

  • Field 7. Safety practice for renal-replacement therapies

    2008, Annales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation
  • Role of the nephrologist in the intensive care unit

    2001, American Journal of Kidney Diseases
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text