δ→δ* Revisited: What the energies and intensities mean☆
References (34)
- et al.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(1983) - et al.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(1982)J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(1984) - et al.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(1976)et al.J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(1961)et al.J. Chem. Phys.
(1968) - et al.
Science
(1964) - et al.(1982)
- et al.
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
(1974)et al.J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
(1975)et al.J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(1975) - et al.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. Symp.
(1974)et al.Chem. Phys. Lett.
(1975) - et al.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(1973) - et al.
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
(1974)et al.J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(1975) - et al.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(1987)
Inorg. Chem.
(1979)
Philos. Mag.
(1949)
(1964)
Adv. Quantum Chem.
(1967)
Trans. Faraday Soc.
(1965)
Inorg. Chem.
(1979)
et al.J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(1983)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(1982)
J. Solid State Chem.
(1985)
et al.Inorg. Chem.
(1979)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(1985)
Cited by (107)
Topological analysis of the metal-metal bond: A tutorial review
2017, Coordination Chemistry ReviewsCharge distribution in metal to ligand charge transfer states of quadruply bonded metal complexes
2015, Coordination Chemistry ReviewsCitation Excerpt :There are now a number of excellent reviews that forms on the application of ultra-fast spectroscopic studies involving both transient absorption and infrared, as applied to metal to ligand charge transfer, MLCT, states [1–3]. Most of the early photophysical studies of quadruply bonded metal complexes focused on the δ to δ* electronic transition [4,5]. This typically is a rather weak transition and can be masked by more intense metal to ligand charge transfer absorptions in dimetal carboxylates.
- ☆
Contribution No. 7482 from the Arthur Amos Noyes Laboratory.
Copyright © 1987 Published by Elsevier Ltd.