Elsevier

Field Crops Research

Volume 54, Issue 1, August 1997, Pages 39-50
Field Crops Research

Stubble retention and tillage in a semi-arid environment: 3. Response of wheat

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00036-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Wheat crops were studied over 4 years at two sites in north-west Victoria, Australia in response to fallow treatments. The four combinations of stubble management (with and without) and tillage (with and without) in 18-month-long fallows of a fallow-wheat rotation were compared with a tilled summer fallow prior to field pea and wheat crops in rotation. Grain yield responded diversely to fallow method. At Dooen, wheat yield from the tilled fallow without stubble increased over that in the field pea-wheat system by an average of 0.9 Mg ha−1 (from 2.7 to 3.6 Mg ha−1). Stubble retention further increased yield over the no-stubble treatments in three of the four years, averaging an additional 0.6 Mg ha−1. At Walpeup the tilled fallow without stubble increased yield above the field pea-wheat system in two years, by 0.7 Mg ha−1 from 2.6 to 3.2 Mg ha−1 in 1990 and by 0.6 Mg ha−1 from 1.7 to 2.3 Mg ha−1 in 1991. Stubble retention increased yield in only one year, 1988, by 0.5 Mg ha−1 and that was with tillage. Zero tillage had no independent effect on yield. Crop water use varied from 173 to 317 mm at Walpeup and from 247 to 435 mm at Dooen. At Walpeup, total crop water use was largely determined by its pre-anthesis component whereas at Dooen it was strongly related to water use during grain filling, indicative of the importance of water reserves deep in the profile, particularly under stubble retention with zero tillage. Total N uptake was strongly related to yield and to a lesser extent to soil mineral nitrogen at sowing. At Walpeup, high wheat grain [N] was observed in the field pea-wheat rotation (2.3 to 2.7% N) and, over both sites and all treatments, high grain [N] was loosely associated with low yield (Walpeup: R2 = 0.51, Dooen: R2 = 0.26). The response of wheat to conservation tillage was strongly driven by water availability and to a lesser extent N availability.

References (26)

  • R.F. de Boer et al.

    Effects of cultivation on rhizoctonia root rot, cereal cyst nematode, common root rot and yield of wheat in the Victorian Mallee

    Aust. J. Exp. Agric.

    (1991)
  • R.A. Fischer

    Responses of soil and crop water relations to tillage

  • R.A. Fischer et al.

    Tillage practices and the growth and yield of wheat in southern New South Wales: Yanco, in a 425 mm rainfall area

    Aust. J. Exp. Agric.

    (1988)
  • Cited by (53)

    • An analysis of the socio-economic factors influencing the adoption of conservation agriculture as a climate change mitigation activity in Australian dryland grain production

      2015, Agricultural Systems
      Citation Excerpt :

      The main reason the farmers interviewed retained stubble was for its benefits in soil moisture retention (Fig. 3, R1). Improved soil moisture also provides more cropping opportunities (Anderson, 2009; Oleary and Connor, 1997; Scott et al., 2010). Mitigating soil erosion (Fig. 3, R2) has also been reported as a significant benefit (by retaining valuable topsoil).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    For papers 1 and 2 in this series please see Field Crops Res., 52: 209–219, 221–229.

    View full text