Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct
Section snippets
A first attempt at measurement: Rotter's locus of control
The search for ways to measure teacher efficacy has not suffered from a lack of effort. In the attempt to capture the meaning of this apparently powerful construct, researchers have tried both long, detailed measures and short, general ones. The first measures were grounded in Rotter's social learning theory.
A second conceptual strand: Bandura's social cognitive theory
While one strand of research grounded in Rotter's social learning theory developed, a second strand emerged, growing out of Bandura's social cognitive theory and his construct of self-efficacy, as initially described in his 1977 article, “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change”. Bandura (1997) defined perceived self-efficacy as “beliefs in one's capabilities to organize and execute the courses of action required to produce given attainments” (p. 3). Self-efficacy is a
Challenges in the measure of teacher efficacy
Studies of teacher efficacy have frequently found two separate dimensions or factors, although considerable confusion and debate have arisen over their meaning. While there is general agreement that the first factor, commonly called personal teaching efficacy, has to do with one's own feelings of competence as a teacher, the meaning of the second factor has been in question. Although it is often called general teaching efficacy, some have argued for other labels. Emmer and Hickman (1990) called
The development of a new measure of teacher efficacy
Deciding how to measure teacher efficacy presents thorny issues. Bandura (1997), Bandura (1997 (2001) recommended including various levels of task demands, allowing respondents to indicate the strength of their efficacy beliefs in light of a variety of impediments or obstacles and providing a broad range of response options. But perhaps the greatest challenge has to do with finding the optimal level of specificity for measurement. Although Bandura would applaud efforts to expand measures of
Testing the instrument
The new measure, named the Ohio State teacher efficacy scale (OSTES), was examined in three separate studies. In the first study, the original 52 items were reduced to 32 and in the second, the scale was further reduced to 18 items made up of three subscales. In the third study, 18 additional items were developed and tested. The resulting instrument had two forms, a long form with 24 items and a short form with 12 items. Finally, the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the new
Implications and directions for future research
The development of the OSTES is a step forward in capturing what has been an elusive construct. It is superior to previous measures of teacher efficacy in that it has a unified and stable factor structure and assesses a broad range of capabilities that teachers consider important to good teaching, without being so specific as to render it useless for comparisons of teachers across contexts, levels, and subjects. Clearly this new scale needs further testing and validation. Clarification of the
References (68)
Differences in teachers’ perceptions of personal control of positive versus negative student learning outcomes
Contemporary Educational Psychology
(1982)Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation
Teaching and Teacher Education
(1988)- et al.
Teacher development and school improvementThe process of teacher change
Teaching and Teacher Education
(1988) - et al.
Teachers’ sense of efficacy and their beliefs about managing students
Teaching and Teacher Education
(1990) The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants
Teacher Education and Special Education
(1994)- et al.
Relationships among teachers’ and students’ thinking skills, sense of efficacy, and student achievement
Alberta Journal of Educational Research
(1988) - Armor, D., Conroy-Oseguera, P., Cox, M., King, N., McDonnell, L., Pascal, A., Pauly, E., & Zellman, G. (1976). Analysis...
- et al.
Teachers’ sense of efficacyA self- or norm-referenced construct?
Florida Journal of Educational Research
(1984) - Ashton, P. T., Olejnik, S., Crocker, L., & McAuliffe, M. (1982). Measurement problems in the study of teachers’ sense...
- et al.
Making a differenceTeachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement
(1986)
Self-efficacyToward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Psychological Review
Social foundations of thought and actionA social cognitive theory
Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning
Educational Psychologist
Self-efficacyThe exercise of control
Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales (Monograph)
Elementary school social climate and student achievement
American Educational Research Journal
Teacher behavior and student achievement
Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching
Journal of Experimental Education
Teacher efficacy, supervision, and the special education resource-room teacher
Journal of Educational Research
Perceived teaching problems, self-efficacy and commitment to teaching among preservice teachers
Journal of Educational Research
Isolation and alienation in educational organizations
Educational Administration Quarterly
Teacher efficacyA construct validation
Journal of Educational Psychology
A comparison of first-year, fifth-year, and former teachers on efficacy, ego development, and problem solving
Psychology in Schools
Collective teacher efficacyIts meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement
American Educational Research Journal
Relationships between four teacher efficacy belief patterns and selected teacher characteristics
Journal of Research and Development in Education
Measurement of responsibility teachers assume for academic successes and failures in the classroom
Journal of Teacher Education
The influence of change in instructional effectiveness upon the affective characteristics of teachers
American Educational Research Journal
Cited by (3047)
The relation between self-efficacy and teaching behaviour: A video-based analysis of student teachers
2024, Learning and InstructionThe impact of disrupted in-person student teaching on preservice teachers’ perceptions of preparedness
2024, Teaching and Teacher EducationDeveloping the Teacher mentoring self-efficacy scale (TMSES) using the Delphi method and exploratory factor analysis
2024, Teaching and Teacher Education