STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF STREPTOCOCCAL AND STAPHYLOCOCCAL SUPERANTIGENS IN SEPTIC SHOCK

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5520(05)70081-7Get rights and content

The pyrogenic exotoxins of group A streptococci (SPEs) and the enterotoxins of Staphylococcus aureus (SEs) constitute a family of structurally related toxins that also share similar biologic activities.26, 30 They stimulate CD4, CD8, and γδ+ T cells by a unique mechanism. These toxins share the ability to bind the β chain variable region (Vβ) elements on the lateral face of the T cell receptor (TCR) and simultaneously bind to the lateral face of the class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC) of antigen-presenting cells (Fig. 1), causing an aberrant proliferation of specific T cell subsets.13, 15, 28 These toxins have been labeled as superantigens,68 because they do not interact with the MHC and TCR molecules in the manner of conventional antigens.31, 39 Superantigens have evolved independently over time from different genetic backgrounds, yet share common structural and functional elements.

These bacterial toxins cause a variety of syndromes in humans. The SEs have been implicated in staphylococcal food poisoning57 and toxic shock–like syndromes.5 The gene sequences and deduced amino acid sequences of at least seven staphylococcal enterotoxins are known: SEA, SEB, SEC, SED, SEE, and SEH.40, 49

The SPEs have been implicated in causing the symptoms of scarlet fever and toxic shock–like syndrome.23, 44, 60 The sequences of three members of this family are known: SPEA, SPEC, and streptococcal superantigen (SSA).17, 48, 66

Toxic shock syndrome toxin (TSST-1) from S. aureus shares similar biologic activity with the SEs and SPEs; however, amino acid sequences of this toxin are significantly different from the latter two classes of toxins.9 Structural analysis suggests that, despite the differences in amino acid composition, the overall topology of TSST-1 and the SE/SPE family of toxins is similar.1

Section snippets

STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION

The molecular structure of SEs and SPEs has been determined by various methods. Reviews concerning the molecular structures are available.40, 52 Molecular evolution studies of the SE/SPE family of toxins suggest that the toxins can be grouped into two main classes.63 All these toxins are highly resistant to denaturation by heat and to proteases. With the exception of TSST-1, they are soluble proteins of approximately 230 amino acids and have a central disulfide loop (TSST-1 has only 194 amino

MITOGENIC ACTIVITY

The cross-linking of TCR with MHC-II molecules by superantigens causes a profound blastogenesis of lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells. The resulting stimulation of leukocytes leads to a significant increase in cytokine production.

Monocytes stimulated with bacterial superantigens produce the Th1 cytokines IL-2 and IFN-γ and the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and IL-1 receptor antagonist.43 T cells activated by superantigen stimulation produce IL-12.37 Whole preparations of peripheral

CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS

The SEs are named for their ability to induce gastrointestinal illnesses upon oral intake of a few micrograms of the toxin. The clinical effect appears in 2 to 4 hours and is manifested by nausea and diarrhea. These symptoms appear to be caused by leukotrienes and histamine released from mast cells. Additionally, both the staphylococcal and streptococcal exotoxins are implicated in gram-positive shock. Although superantigen-related septic shock appears to be primarily mediated by tumor necrosis

TWO-HIT HYPOTHESIS OF SEPTIC SHOCK

There is increasing evidence that gram-positive infections frequently accompany gram-negative infections in patients with septic shock (see article by Rangel-Frausto, pages 299–312). Exposure to gram-negative endotoxin produces a state of macrophage hyporesponsiveness on subsequent stimulation.3 A similar state is seen with monocytes in septic shock. Our group and others have shown that LPS and superantigens can act synergistically to produce lethal septic shock in animal models.52 It is our

THERAPEUTIC MEASURES

The clinical manifestations of shock are complicated and require a variety of supportive measures. These include fluid therapy (assuming adequate renal function), vasoactive agents aimed at maintaining blood pressure, and other supportive measures to maintain homeostasis. Fluid replacement is a simple treatment shown to be quite effective in a rabbit model of toxic shock.35 Additionally, appropriate antibiotics given intravenously are part of current standard therapy.

Therapies directed at the

References (69)

  • StelmaG.N. et al.

    Inactivation of staphylococcal enterotoxin A by chemical modification

    Biochem Biophys Res Commun

    (1982)
  • Van den BusscheR.A. et al.

    Molecular evolution of the staphylococcal and streptococcal pyrogenic toxin gene family

    Mol Phylogenet Evol

    (1993)
  • J.R. Warren et al.

    Stabilization of native structure by the closed disulfide loop of staphylococcal enterotoxin B

    Biochim Biophys Acta

    (1974)
  • J. White et al.

    The V beta-specific superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin B: Stimulation of mature T cells and clonal deletion in neonatal mice

    Cell

    (1989)
  • K.R. Acharya et al.

    Structural basis of superantigen action inferred from crystal structure of toxic-shock syndrome toxin-1

    Nature

    (1994)
  • J. Andersson et al.

    Lymphokine production induced by streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin-A is selectively down-regulated by pooled human IgG

    Eur J Immunol

    (1994)
  • J.D. Bannan et al.

    Neutralization of streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxins and staphylococcal enterotoxins by antisera to synthetic peptides representing conserved amino acid motifs

    Adv Exp Med Biol

    (1997)
  • M.S. Bergdoll

    The staphylococcal enterotoxins—An update

  • C. Blank et al.

    Superantigens and endotoxin synergize in the induction of lethal shock

    Eur J Immunol

    (1997)
  • D.A. Blomster-Hautama et al.

    The nucleotide and partial amino acid sequence of toxic shock syndrome toxin-1

    J Biol Chem

    (1986)
  • G.A. Bohach et al.

    Cross-neutralization of staphylococcal and streptococcal pyrogenic toxins by monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies

    Infect Immun

    (1988)
  • S. Brocke et al.

    Induction of relapsing paralysis in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by bacterial superantigen

    Nature

    (1993)
  • S.K. Chapes et al.

    Differential RNA regulation by staphylococcal enterotoxins A and B in murine macrophages

    J Leukoc Biol

    (1994)
  • Y. Choi et al.

    Interaction of Staphylococcus aureus toxin superantigens with human T cells

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (1989)
  • C. Edwin et al.

    Specificity and cross-reactivity of staphylococcal enterotoxin A monoclonal antibodies with enterotoxins B, C1, D, and E

    Appl Environ Microbiol

    (1986)
  • B. Fleischer et al.

    T cell stimulation by staphylococcal enterotoxins. Clonally variable response and requirement for major histocompatibility complex class II molecules on accessory or target cells

    J Exp Med

    (1988)
  • R. Goldbach-Mansky et al.

    A co-stimulatory role for CD28 in the activation of CD4+ T lymphocytes by staphylococcal enterotoxin B

    Int Immunol

    (1992)
  • S.C. Goshorn et al.

    Nucleotide sequence of streptococcal exotoxin type C

    Infect Immun

    (1988)
  • N.D. Griggs et al.

    Mapping of multiple binding domains of the superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin A for HLA

    J Immunol

    (1992)
  • D. Grossman et al.

    Dissociation of the stimulatory activities of staphylococcal enterotoxins for T cells and monocytes

    J Exp Med

    (1990)
  • D. Grossman et al.

    Mutation of the disulfide loop in staphylococcal enterotoxin A. Consequences for T cell recognition

    J Immunol

    (1991)
  • S.P. Hackett et al.

    Superantigens associated with staphylococcal and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome are potent inducers of tumor necrosis factor beta synthesis

    J Infect Dis

    (1993)
  • U.F. Hartwig et al.

    Mutations affecting MHC class II binding of the superantigen streptococcal erythrogenic toxin A

    Int Immunol

    (1993)
  • A.R. Hauser et al.

    Molecular analysis of pyrogenic exotoxins from Streptococcus pyogenes isolates associated with toxic shock–like syndrome

    J Clin Microbiol

    (1991)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Disseminated Infections: A Clinical Overview

      2014, Molecular Medical Microbiology
    • Staphylococcus aureus toxins - Their functions and genetics

      2014, Infection, Genetics and Evolution
      Citation Excerpt :

      In animal models, SAgs and LPS, a major component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria and highly potent stimulator of the innate immune system, most effectively synergize in the induction of lethal shock (Blank et al., 1997; Schlievert, 1982). This observation prompted the development of the two-hit model of septic shock (Bannan et al., 1999), which was later generalized by Holtfreter and Bröker: A first hit by SAgs or other potent T cell stimuli is potentiated by a second hit by pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), which activate the innate immune system. This sequence of events culminates in a dramatic, often lethal activation of the whole immune system (Holtfreter and Bröker, 2005).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Address reprint requests to John B. Zabriskie, MD, Rockefeller University, 1230 York Ave, New York, New York 10021

    View full text