Review of 62 risk analysis methodologies of industrial plants

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-4230(02)00008-6Get rights and content

Abstract

For about 10 years, many methodologies have been developed to undertake a risk analysis on an industrial plant. In this paper, 62 methodologies have been identified, these are separated into three different phases (identification, evaluation and hierarchisation). In order to understand their running, it seems necessary to examine the input data, methods used, obtained output data and to rank them in several classes. First, all the input data are grouped together into seven classes (plan or diagram, process and reaction, products, probability and frequency, policy, environment, text, and historical knowledge). Then, the methods are ranked in six classes based on the combination of four usual criteria (qualitative, quantitative, deterministic and probabilistic). And finally, the output data are classified into four classes (management, list, probabilistic and hierarchisation). This classification permits the appraisal of risk analysis methodologies. With the intention of understanding the running of these methodologies, the connections between the three defined previously criteria (determinist, probabilistic and determinist and probabilistic) are brought to the fore. Then the paper deals with the application fields and the main limitations of these methodologies. So the hierarchisation phase is discussed and the type of scale used. This paper highlights the difficulties in taking into account all risks for an industrial plant and suggests that there is not only one general method to deal with the problems of industrial risks.

Introduction

The industrial risk problem and the diversification of risk types have increased concurrently with industrial development. In the same time, the risk acceptability threshold of the population has decreased. In response to this preoccupation, competent authorities and industrialists have developed methodologies and tools for risk prevention and protection, as well as crisis management.

To cope up with major accidents, a previous analyses should be done. The forward-looking risk analysis permits an exhaustive identification of potential hazardous sources to prevent accident scenarios and to assess potential impact on human, environmental and equipment targets in order to propose prevention or protection (Lagadec, 1980). The risk analysis methodologies focuses on the main hazard sources. Two principal sources of risk can be brought to the fore: industrial establishment and transport of dangerous goods. These two types of sources are quite different. At first sight, the quantities involved are not really comparable, and the environment is unsettled for an industrial site whilst the opposite is true for the case of transport of dangerous goods.

So to analyse and to manage safety aspects, various approaches are proposed, they focus on organisational and technical features. Sixty-two risk analysis methodologies are set out in the following.

Section snippets

Risk analysis methodologies

The management of major industrial risk should be one of the most important preoccupations for operators. To deal with this problem, many risk analysis methodologies were developed by industrialists and competent authorities.

The risk hierarchisation

The recent evolution in risk analysis methodologies shows that easily applicable methods are proposed with a risk level index as a result. The hierarchisation consists of the action to organise some elements, data, or events in increasing (or decreasing) order with the help of classification tabs, with the view to bringing out the main points for analysis. These methodologies are simple and rapid to use, the specific hierarchisation rules in the shape of data table are usually provided by the

Conclusion

The use of risk analysis methodologies contributes to the prevention of accidents and to the preparation for emergency response. This work based on the review of 62 methodologies underlines the difficulty in taking into account all risks for an industrial site. This paper highlights the different types of input data, methods, output data and their links. A risk analysis methodology can be simple and only focus on the identification of hazards or a combined risk analysis methodology. A combined

References (41)

  • I.A. Papazoglou et al.

    Probabilistic safety analysis in chemical installation

    Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

    (1992)
  • B. Rasmussen et al.

    Hazard identification on plant functional modelling

    Reliability Engineering and System Safety

    (1997)
  • W.P.G. Schlechter

    Facility risk review as a mean to addressing existing risks during the life cycle of a process unit, operation or facility

    International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping

    (1996)
  • A. Toola

    Plant level safety analysis

    Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

    (1992)
  • H.M. Tweeddale et al.

    Some experiences in hazard identification and risk shortlisting

    Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

    (1992)
  • S. Yang et al.

    Hazard analysis and support tool for computer controlled processes

    Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

    (1998)
  • C. Alonso et al.

    A method to determine environmental risk in chemical process industries

  • DOW’s Fire & Explosion Index Hazard Classification Guide. (1987). American Institute of Chemical...
  • DOW’s Chemical Exposure Index Guide. (1994). American Institute of Chemical Engineers (1st...
  • C. Delvosalle et al.

    Development of a methodology for the identification of potential domino effects in Seveso industries

  • Cited by (0)

    View full text