Review of 62 risk analysis methodologies of industrial plants
Introduction
The industrial risk problem and the diversification of risk types have increased concurrently with industrial development. In the same time, the risk acceptability threshold of the population has decreased. In response to this preoccupation, competent authorities and industrialists have developed methodologies and tools for risk prevention and protection, as well as crisis management.
To cope up with major accidents, a previous analyses should be done. The forward-looking risk analysis permits an exhaustive identification of potential hazardous sources to prevent accident scenarios and to assess potential impact on human, environmental and equipment targets in order to propose prevention or protection (Lagadec, 1980). The risk analysis methodologies focuses on the main hazard sources. Two principal sources of risk can be brought to the fore: industrial establishment and transport of dangerous goods. These two types of sources are quite different. At first sight, the quantities involved are not really comparable, and the environment is unsettled for an industrial site whilst the opposite is true for the case of transport of dangerous goods.
So to analyse and to manage safety aspects, various approaches are proposed, they focus on organisational and technical features. Sixty-two risk analysis methodologies are set out in the following.
Section snippets
Risk analysis methodologies
The management of major industrial risk should be one of the most important preoccupations for operators. To deal with this problem, many risk analysis methodologies were developed by industrialists and competent authorities.
The risk hierarchisation
The recent evolution in risk analysis methodologies shows that easily applicable methods are proposed with a risk level index as a result. The hierarchisation consists of the action to organise some elements, data, or events in increasing (or decreasing) order with the help of classification tabs, with the view to bringing out the main points for analysis. These methodologies are simple and rapid to use, the specific hierarchisation rules in the shape of data table are usually provided by the
Conclusion
The use of risk analysis methodologies contributes to the prevention of accidents and to the preparation for emergency response. This work based on the review of 62 methodologies underlines the difficulty in taking into account all risks for an industrial site. This paper highlights the different types of input data, methods, output data and their links. A risk analysis methodology can be simple and only focus on the identification of hazards or a combined risk analysis methodology. A combined
References (41)
- et al.
Safety related questions for computer-controlled plants: Derivation, organisation and application
Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
(1998) - et al.
The work process analysis model (WPAM)
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
(1994) Risk follow up by probabilistic safety assessment-experience from a finish pilot study
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
(1996)- et al.
Measures of safety management performance and attitudes to safety at major hazard sites
Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
(1996) - et al.
Development of a hazard and operability-based method for identifying safety management vulnerabilities in high risk systems
Safety Sciences
(1998) - et al.
OptHazop—an effective and optimum approach for Hazop study
Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
(1997) - et al.
Accident hazard index: A multi-attribute method for process industry hazard rating
Process safety and environmental protection
(1997) - et al.
Inherently safer design based on rapid risk analysis
Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
(1998) - et al.
Techniques and methodologies for risk analysis in chemical process industries
Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
(1998) - et al.
Risk assessment of process models
Computers & Industrial Engineering
(1996)