Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of wave fields caused by four proposed beach nourishment schemes in Beidaihe, China

  • Hydraulic Engineering and Water Conservancy
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The erosion of west beach in Beidaihe has become severe in the recent years. In order to nourish the beach, four different engineering nourishment schemes are proposed. As a near shore project, wave is the main force in the sea area of west beach. Based on the information above, wave fields in the sea area of west beach under both ordinary wave condition (S, Hs=0.7m, T=3.2s) and strong wave condition (NE, Hs=1.5m, T=4.7s) are analyzed. The result shows that beach nourishment with two jetties and three submerged breakwaters protects the west beach most effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bird E C F. Coastline Changes: a Global Review [M]. Wiley-Interscience, Chichester, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Van der Salm J, Unal O. Towards a common Mediterranean framework for beach nourishment projects [J]. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 2003, 9: 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Finkl C W. Beach nourishment, a practical method of erosion control [J]. Geo-Marine Letters, 1981, 1(2): 1432–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hanson H, Brampton A, Capobianco M. Beach nourishment projects, practices, and objectives—a European overview [J]. Coastal Engi, 2002, 47: 87–111.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Menn I, Junghans C, Reise K. Buried alive: Effects of beach nourishment on the infauna of an erosive shore in the North Sea [J]. Marine Biodiversity, 2003, 32(1/2): 125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dean R G. Beach Nourishment Benefits, Theory and Case Examples [M]. Environmentally Friendly Coastal Protection, 2005:25-40.

  7. Smith M D, Slott J M, McNamara D, et al. Beach nourishment as a dynamic capital accumulation problem [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2009, 58: 58–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Castelle B, Turner I L, Bertin X, Tomlinson R. Beach nourishments as Coolangatta Bay over the period 1987–2005: Impacts and lessons [J]. Coastal Engi, 2009, 56: 940–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dean R G, Chen R J, Browder A E. Full scale monitoring study of a submerged breakwater, Palm Beach, Florida, USA [J]. Coastal Engi., 1997, 29(3/4): 291–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ranasinghe R. Turner I.L.. Shoreline response to submerged structures: A review [J]. Coastal Engi, 2006: 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Booij N, Ris R C, Holthuijsen L H. A third-generation wave model for coastal regions [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1999, 104(C4): 7649–7666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cui-ping Kuang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuang, Cp., He, Ll., Zhang, Y. et al. Comparison of wave fields caused by four proposed beach nourishment schemes in Beidaihe, China. J Hydrodyn 22 (Suppl 1), 685–691 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(10)60021-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(10)60021-2

Key Words

Navigation