Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6Get rights and content

Abstract

The built environment is thought to influence travel demand along three principal dimensions —density, diversity, and design. This paper tests this proposition by examining how the ‘3Ds’ affect trip rates and mode choice of residents in the San Francisco Bay Area. Using 1990 travel diary data and land-use records obtained from the U.S. census, regional inventories, and field surveys, models are estimated that relate features of the built environment to variations in vehicle miles traveled per household and mode choice, mainly for non-work trips. Factor analysis is used to linearly combine variables into the density and design dimensions of the built environment. The research finds that density, land-use diversity, and pedestrian-oriented designs generally reduce trip rates and encourage non-auto travel in statistically significant ways, though their influences appear to be fairly marginal. Elasticities between variables and factors that capture the 3Ds and various measures of travel demand are generally in the 0.06 to 0.18 range, expressed in absolute terms. Compact development was found to exert the strongest influence on personal business trips. Within-neighborhood retail shops, on the other hand, were most strongly associated with mode choice for work trips. And while a factor capturing ‘walking quality’ was only moderately related to mode choice for non-work trips, those living in neighborhoods with grid-iron street designs and restricted commercial parking were nonetheless found to average significantly less vehicle miles of travel and rely less on single-occupant vehicles for non-work trips. Overall, this research shows that the elasticities between each dimension of the built environment and travel demand are modest to moderate, though certainly not inconsequential. Thus it supports the contention of new urbanists and others that creating more compact, diverse, and pedestrian-orientated neighborhoods, in combination, can meaningfully influence how Americans travel.

References (34)

  • R. Cervero

    Mixed land uses and commuting: evidence from the American housing survey

    Transportation Research

    (1996)
  • R. Cervero et al.

    Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighborhoods

    Transport Policy

    (1996)
  • D. Banister et al.

    The key issues in transport and urban development

  • P. Calthorpe

    The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream

    (1994)
  • Cambridge Systematics

    The Effects of Land Use and Travel Demand Strategies on Commuting Behavior

    (1994)
  • R. Cervero

    America's Suburban Centers: The Land Use-transportation Link

    (1989)
  • R. Cervero

    Land uses and travel at suburban activity centers

    Transportation Quarterly

    (1991)
  • R. Cervero

    Transit-supportive Development in the United States: Experiences and Prospects

    (1993)
  • R. Cervero et al.

    An Evaluation of the Relationships Between Transit and Urban Form

    National Research Council, Transportation Cooperative Research Program, Research Results Digest

    (1995)
  • S. Chatterjee et al.

    Regression Analysis by Example

    (1991)
  • R. Crane

    Cars and drivers in the new suburbs: linking access to travel in neotraditional planning

    Journal of the American Planning Association

    (1996)
  • H. Dittmar

    A broader context for transportation planning: not just an end in itself

    Journal of the American Planning Association

    (1995)
  • A. Downs

    New Visions for Metropolitan America

    (1994)
  • R. Dunphy et al.

    Transportation, congestion, and density: new insights

    Transportation Research Record

    (1996)
  • G.H. Dunteman

    Introduction to Multivariate Analysis

    (1984)
  • R. Ewing

    Characteristics, causes, and effects of sprawl: a literature review

    Environmental and Urban Issues

    (1994)
  • R. Ewing et al.

    Getting around a traditional city, a suburban PUD, and everything in-between

    Transportation Research Record

    (1994)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text