Chapter 22 Economics of general practice

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0064(00)80035-9Get rights and content

Abstract

General (or family) practice and its role within primary care is increasingly regarded as the key to achieving efficiency and equity in many health care systems. This is particularly relevant where general practitioners (GPs) act as gatekeepers to specialist care. This chapter outlines the main economic issues in general practice. Within the context of gatekeeping, the first half of the chapter examines literature on agency, patient choice and preferences for GP services, and the utilisation of GP services. Given that much demand is determined by supply, this is followed by an examination of the determinants of referral behaviour, the effects of payment systems, and GPs as firms (partnerships and vertical integration). Overall, there has been little research by economists in these areas. This needs to be rectified giving the growing importance of primary care in many health care systems.

References (135)

  • KristiansenI.S. et al.

    Remuneration of GP services: time for more explicit objectives? A review of the systems in five industrialised countries

    Health Policy

    (1993)
  • KristiansenI.S. et al.

    The general practitioner's use of time: Is it influenced by the remuneration system?

    Social Science and Medicine

    (1993)
  • OngL.M. et al.

    Doctor-patient communication: A review of the literature

    Social Science and Medicine

    (1995)
  • RochaixL.

    Information asymmetry and search in the market for physician services

    Journal of Health Economics

    (1989)
  • RosenB.

    Professional reimbursement and professional behaviour: Emerging issues and research challenges

    Social Science and Medicine

    (1989)
  • AlchianA.A. et al.

    Production, information costs and economic organisation

    American Economic Review

    (1972)
  • ArmstrongD. et al.

    Doctors' perceptions of pressure from patients for referral

    British Medical Journal

    (1991)
  • ArrighettiA. et al.

    Contract law, social norms and inter-firm co-operation

    Cambridge Journal of Economics

    (1997)
  • BaileyJ. et al.

    Analysing general practitioners' referral decisions II: Do high and low referrers differ in factors influencing their referral decisions?

    Family Practice

    (1994)
  • BakerR. et al.

    What type of general practice do patients prefer. Exploration of practice characteristics influencing patient satisfaction

    British Journal of General Practice

    (1995)
  • BradfordW.D.

    Solo versus group practice in the medical profession. The influence of malpractice risk

    Health Economics

    (1995)
  • BurchellB. et al.

    Trust, business relationships and the contractual environment

    Cambridge Journal of Economics

    (1997)
  • BurkeW.

    Training generalist physicians: Structural elements of the curriculum

    Journal of General Internal Medicine

    (1993)
  • CalnanM. et al.

    Major determinants of consumer satisfaction with primary care in different countries

    Family Practice

    (1994)
  • CalnanM. et al.

    Changing perceptions of general practitioner care

    European Journal of Public Health

    (1994)
  • CampbellJ.L.

    General practitioner appointment systems, patient satisfaction, and use of accident and emergency services. A study in one geographical area

    Family Practice

    (1994)
  • Carr-HillR.A. et al.

    Socioeconomic determinants of rates of consultation in general practice based on fourth national morbidity survey of general practices

    British Medical Journal

    (1996)
  • CassonM. et al.

    Communication costs and the boundaries of the firm

  • CoulterA.

    The interface between primary and secondary care

  • CoulterA. et al.

    Effect of NHS reforms on general practitioners' referral patterns

    British Medical Journal

    (1993)
  • CroxsonB. et al.

    Do doctors respond to financial incetives? UK family doctors and the GP fundholder scheme

  • DietrichA.J. et al.

    Does continuous care from a physician make a difference?

    Journal of Family Practice

    (1982)
  • DixonP. et al.

    Patient movements and patient choice

  • DolanP.

    The measurement of health-related quality of life for use in resource allocation decisions

  • DonaldsonC. et al.

    Paying general practitioners: Shedding light on the review of health services

    Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners

    (1989)
  • DowieR.

    General Practitioners and Consultants: A Study of Outpatient Referrals

    (1983)
  • DranoveD.

    Demand inducement and the physician-patient relationship

    Economic Inquiry

    (1988)
  • EncinosaW.E. et al.

    The sociology of groups and the economics of incentives: Theory and evidence on compensation systems

  • EnnewC. et al.

    Entrepreneurial activity in the public sector: Evidence form UK primary care

  • EvansR.G.

    Supplier-induced demand: some empirical evidence and implications

  • FeldsteinM.S.

    The rising price of physicians' services

    Review of Economics and Statistics

    (1970)
  • FlemingD.

    The interface between general practice and secondary care in Europe and North America

  • FranksP. et al.

    Gatekeeping revisited — protecting patients from overtreatment

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (1992)
  • FreemanG.K.

    Continuity of care in general practice: A review and critique

    Family Practice

    (1984)
  • FreemanG.K. et al.

    Is personal continuity of care compatible with free choice of doctor? Patients' views on seeing the same doctor

    British Journal of General Practice

    (1993)
  • FryJ. et al.

    Primary Health Care in an International Context

    (1994)
  • GaynorM.

    Competition within the firm: theory plus some evidence from medical group practice

    Rand Journal of Economics

    (1989)
  • GaynorM. et al.

    Moral hazard and risk spreading in partnerships

    Rand Journal of Economics

    (1995)
  • GaynorM. et al.

    Compensation and productive efficiency in partnerships: Evidence from medical group practice

    Journal of Political Economy

    (1990)
  • GervasJ. et al.

    Primary care, financing and gatekeeping in Western Europe

    Family Practice

    (1994)
  • Cited by (62)

    • Consensus among clinicians on referrals’ priority and use of digital decision-making support systems

      2022, Health Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      The value of peer review as a powerful tool to improve the quality of referrals, is also confirmed by Blank et al. [14], who identify, through a large review, four relevant strategies such as peer review and training/feedback, specialist consultation before referral, electronic referral, and community provision by specialists. While the potential role of GPs in reducing unnecessary referrals and therefore enhancing the efficiency of spending on specialty care is well established [18], evidence on their use of decision support tools and, specifically on electronic referral support systems (e-RSS) is still lacking [14,19]. Clinical priority setting for specialist visits and diagnostic tests, as a tool for gatekeeping, should ideally reduce the demand for referrals, eliminating those deemed inappropriate by attributing a low priority to potentially inappropriate referrals which are considered deferrable.

    • An experiment on referrals in health care

      2021, European Economic Review
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    * I am very grateful to Hugh Gravelle for his role in developing this chapter. Wynand van de Ven, Joe Newhouse and Tony Culyer also provided useful comments. The Health Economics Research Unit is funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Executive Health Department. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author.

    View full text