Abstract
Natural fibres are very versatile materials, their properties vary with chemical composition and physical structure. The effects of alkali, silane and combined alkali and silane treatments on the mechanical (tensile), morphological, and structural properties of Pine Apple Leave Fibres (PALF) and Kenaf Fibres (KF) were investigated with the aim to improve their compatibility with polymer matrices. The effectiveness of the alkali and saline treatments in the removal of impurities from the fibre surfaces was confirmed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Fourier Transform Infrared spectrometry (FTIR) observation. The morphological study of treated PALF and KF by SEM indicates that silane treated fibres have less impurities and lignin and hemicelluloses removed than those by other chemical treatments. Silane treated PALF and KF display better tensile strength than those of untreated, alkaline and NaOH-silane treated. Droplet test indicates that the Interfacial Stress Strength (IFSS) of alkali and silane treated PALF and KF are enhanced whereas silane treated fibres display highest IFSS. It is assumed that fibre treatments will help to develop high performance KF and PALF reinforced polymer composites for industrial applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashori A. Nonwood fibers—A potential source of raw material in papermaking. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, 2006, 45, 1133–1136.
Saba N, Tahir P M, Jawaid M. A review on potentiality of nano filler/natural fiber filled polymer hybrid composites. Polymers, 2014, 6, 2247–2273.
Thakur V K, Singha A S, Mehta I K. Renewable resource-based green polymer composites: Analysis and characterization. International Journal of Polymer Analysis and Characterization, 2010, 15, 137–146.
Petchwattana N, Covavisaruch S. Mechanical and morphological properties of wood plastic biocomposites prepared from toughened poly (lactic acid) and rubber wood sawdust (Hevea brasiliensis). Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2014, 11, 630–637.
Sedan D, Pagnoux C, Smith A, Chotard T. Mechanical properties of hemp fibre reinforced cement: Influence of the fibre/matrix interaction. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2008, 28, 183–192.
Li X, Tabil L G, Panigrahi S. Chemical treatments of natural fiber for use in natural fiber-reinforced composites: A review. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 2007, 15, 25–33.
Rachini A, Le Troedec M, Peyratout C, Smith A. Chemical modification of hemp fibers by silane coupling agents. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2012, 123, 601–610.
Asim M, Abdan K, Jawaid M, Nasir M, Dashtizadeh Z, Ishak M R, Hoque M E. A review on pineapple leaves fibre and its composites. International Journal of Polymer Science, 2015, 2015, 950567.
Aji I, Sapuan S, Zainudin E, Abdan K. Kenaf fibres as reinforcement for polymeric composites: A review. International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, 2009, 4, 239–248.
Khalil H P S A, Yusra A F I, Bhat A H, Jawaid M. Cell wall ultrastructure, anatomy, lignin distribution, and chemical composition of Malaysian cultivated kenaf fiber. Industrial Crops and Products, 2010, 31, 113–121.
Asumani O M L, Reid R G, Paskaramoorthy R. The effects of alkali–silane treatment on the tensile and flexural properties of short fibre non-woven kenaf reinforced polypropylene composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2012, 43, 1431–1440.
Bernard M, Khalina A, Ali A, Janius R, Faizal M, Hasnah K, Sanuddin A. The effect of processing parameters on the mechanical properties of kenaf fibre plastic composite. Materials & Design, 2011, 32, 1039–1043.
Essabir H, Achaby M E, Hilali E M, Bouhfid R, Qaiss A. Morphological, structural, thermal and tensile properties of high density polyethylene composites reinforced with treated Argan nut shell particles. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2015, 12, 129–141.
Terpakova E, Kidalova L, Eštoková A, Čigášová J, Števulová N. Chemical modification of hemp shives and their characterization. Procedia Engineering, 2012, 42, 931–941.
Meon M S, Othman M F, Husain H, Remeli M F, Syawal M S M. Improving tensile properties of kenaf fibers treated with sodium hydroxide. Procedia Engineering, 2012, 41, 1587–1592.
Puglia D, Monti M, Santulli C, Sarasini F, De Rosa I M, Kenny J M. Effect of alkali and silane treatments on mechanical and thermal behavior of Phormium tenax fibers. Fibers and Polymers, 2013, 14, 423–427.
Sgriccia N, Hawley M C, Misra M. Characterization of natural fiber surfaces and natural fiber composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2008, 39, 1632–1637.
Huo S, Thapa A, Ulven C. Effect of surface treatments on interfacial properties of flax fiber-reinforced composites. Advanced Composite Materials, 2013, 22, 109–121.
Lopattananon N, Panawarangkul K, Sahakaro K, Ellis B. Performance of pineapple leaf fiber–natural rubber composites: The effect of fiber surface treatments. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2006, 102, 1974–1984.
Edeerozey A M, Akil H M, Azhar A, Ariffin M Z. Chemical modification of kenaf fibers. Materials Letters, 2007, 61, 2023–2025.
Threepopnatkul P, Kaerkitcha N, Athipongarporn N. Effect of surface treatment on performance of pineapple leaf fiber–polycarbonate composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2009, 40, 628–632.
Kabir M, Wang H, Lau K, Cardona F. Tensile properties of chemically treated hemp fibres as reinforcement for composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2013, 53, 362–368.
Mukhopadhyay S, Fangueiro R, Arpac Y, Şentürk Ü. Banana fibers–variability and fracture behaviour. Cellulose, 2008, 31, 39–45.
Ishak M R, Sapuan S M, Leman Z, Rahman M Z A, Anwar U M K. Characterization of sugar palm (Arenga pinnata) fibres. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2011, 109, 981–989.
Sawpan M A, Pickering K L, Fernyhough A. Effect of fibre treatments on interfacial shear strength of hemp fibre reinforced polylactide and unsaturated polyester composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2011, 42, 1189–1196.
Ray D, Sarkar B. Characterization of alkali-treated jute fibers for physical and mechanical properties. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2001, 80, 1013–1020.
Samal R, Ray M C. Effect of chemical modifications on FTIR spectra. II. Physicochemical behavior of pineapple leaf fiber (PALF). Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1997, 64, 2119–2125.
Stark N M, Matuana L M. Surface chemistry changes of weathered HDPE/wood-flour composites studied by XPS and FTIR spectroscopy. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 2004, 86, 1–9.
Mwaikambo L Y, Ansell M P. Chemical modification of hemp, sisal, jute, and kapok fibers by alkalization. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2002, 84, 2222–2234.
Huda M S, Drzal L T, Mohanty A K, Misra M. Effect of chemical modifications of the pineapple leaf fiber surfaces on the interfacial and mechanical properties of laminated biocomposites. Composite Interfaces, 2008, 15, 169–191.
Razak N I, Ibrahim N A, Zainuddin N, Rayung M, Saad W Z. The influence of chemical surface modification of kenaf fiber using hydrogen peroxide on the mechanical properties of biodegradable kenaf fiber/poly(lactic acid) composites. Molecules, 2014, 19, 2957–2968.
Joonobi M, Harun J, Tahir P M, Zaini L H, SaifulAzry S, Makinejad M D. Characteristic of nanofibers extracted from kenaf core. BioResources, 2010, 5, 2556–2566.
El Mechtali F Z, Essabir H, Nekhlaoui S, Ouadi Bensalah M, Jawaid M, Bouhfid R, Qaiss A. Mechanical and thermal properties of polypropylene reinforced with almond shells particle: Impact of chemical treatments. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2015, 12, 483–494.
Sun R, Sun X, Fowler P Tomkinson J. Structural and physico-chemical characterization of lignins solubilized during alkaline peroxide treatment of barley straw. European Polymer Journal, 2002, 38, 1399–1407.
Hamdan S, Talib Z A, Rahman M R. Dynamic Youngs modulus measurement of treated and post-treated tropical wood polymer composites (WPC)’. BioResources, 2009, 5, 324–342.
Aziz S H, Ansell M P. The effect of alkalization and fibre alignment on the mechanical and thermal properties of kenaf and hemp bast fibre composites: Part 1–polyester resin matrix. Composites Science and Technology, 2004, 64, 1219–1230.
Goud G, Rao R. Effect of fibre content and alkali treatment on mechanical properties of Roystonea regia-reinforced epoxy partially biodegradable composites. Bulletin of Materials Science, 2011, 34, 1575–1581.
Hossain M K, Dewan M W, Hosur M, Jeelani S. Mechanical performances of surface modified jute fiber reinforced biopol nanophased green composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2011, 42, 1701–1707.
Das M, Chakrabarty D. Thermogravimetric analysis and weathering study by water immersion of alkali treated bamboo fibres. BioResources, 2008, 3, 1051–1062.
Guimarães J L, Frollini E, Da Silva C G, Wypych F, Satyanarayana K. Characterization of banana, sugarcane bagasse and sponge gourd fibers of Brazil. Industrial Crops and Products, 2009, 30, 407–415.
Sreekala M, Kumaran M, Thomas S. Oil palm fibers: Morphology, chemical composition, surface modification, and mechanical properties. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 1997, 66, 821–835.
Ibrahim N A, Hadithon K A, Abdan K. Effect of fiber treatment on mechanical properties of kenaf fiber-ecoflex composites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 2010, 29, 2192–2198.
Mishra S, Mohanty A, Drzal L, Misra M, Parija S, Nayak S, Tripathy S. Studies on mechanical performance of biofibre/glass reinforced polyester hybrid composites. Composites Science and Technology, 2003, 63, 1377–1385.
Nirmal U, Singh N, Hashim J, Lau S T, Jamil N. On the effect of different polymer matrix and fibre treatment on single fibre pullout test using betelnut fibres. Materials & Design, 2011, 32, 2717–2726.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Asim, M., Jawaid, M., Abdan, K. et al. Effect of Alkali and Silane Treatments on Mechanical and Fibre-matrix Bond Strength of Kenaf and Pineapple Leaf Fibres. J Bionic Eng 13, 426–435 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60315-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60315-3